But this was fixed long ago in PG, not? At least Fonzy told me so.ernest wrote:Remember the discussion with Greg Simpson in
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... =&start=20
You said:
...I have no idea. If this is standard behavior for UCI engines, it should be considered an error of Polyglot translating UCI to WB protocol. If Polyglot would only forward those lines to WB it is not receiving for a second or later time, things would work smoothly
Arena 2.0 beauty contest! :-)
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 28391
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Arena 2.0 beauty contest! :-)
-
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:30 pm
Re: Arena 2.0 beauty contest! :-)
Do you have more details?hgm wrote:But this was fixed long ago in PG, not? At least Fonzy told me so.
Which PG version?
Thanks,
Ernest
-
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:21 pm
- Location: Nederland
Re: Arena 2.0 beauty contest! :-)
This discussion is from october 2008.ernest wrote:Remember the discussion with Greg Simpson in
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... =&start=20
You said:
...I have no idea. If this is standard behavior for UCI engines, it should be considered an error of Polyglot translating UCI to WB protocol. If Polyglot would only forward those lines to WB it is not receiving for a second or later time, things would work smoothly
The pv problems were solved after that.
Please see http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 52&t=22008
Best
Fonzy
-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:34 am