Super Tournament 8CPU (live broadcasts)

lech · Post by **lech** » Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:22 pm

Graham Banks wrote: Still expensive, but at least my hobby keeps me at home!

I was out of home.

I return and I see Bouquet - Stockfish, should be draw in the endgame. I was very happy, the next game of Sting. But my next look.. and I see Critter - ....

Graham you are a wizard.

It was too much fresh good beer!

bupalo · Post by **bupalo** » Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:37 pm

who is the winner between houdini and Rybka?

lech · Post by **lech** » Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:39 pm

draw houdini was lucky

Graham Banks · Post by **Graham Banks** » Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:09 pm

Round 6

Deep Rybka 4.1S 64-bit 8CPU v Houdini 2.0c 64-bit 8CPU (draw)
Deep Hiarcs 14 8CPU v Spark 1.0 64-bit 8CPU (1-0)
IvanHoe 9.46h 64-bit 8CPU v DeepSaros 3.0 64-bit 8CPU (draw)
Protector 1.4.0 64-bit 8CPU v Vitruvius 1.11C 64-bit 8CPU (0-1)
Bouquet 1.5 64-bit 8CPU v Stockfish 2.3.1 64-bit 8CPU (draw)
Sting SF PV 120629 64-bit 8CPU v Deep Shredder 12 64-bit 8CPU (draw)
Critter 1.6a 64-bit 8CPU v Deep Sjeng WC2008 64-bit 8CPU (draw)
Naum 4.2 64-bit 8CPU v Zappa Mexico II 64-bit 8CPU (draw)
Deep Onno 1.2.70 64-bit 8CPU v Chiron 1.1a 64-bit 8CPU (draw)
Deep Junior 13.3 64-bit 8CPU v Tornado 4.88 64-bit 8CPU (1-0)
Arminius 2012-08-14 8CPU v Jonny 4.00 8CPU (0-1)
BugChess2 1.9 64-bit 8CPU v Crafty 23.5 64-bit 8CPU (draw)
MinkoChess 1.3 64-bit 8CPU v Arasan 15.0 64-bit 8CPU (1-0)
Gaviota 0.85.1 64-bit 8CPU v Bright 0.5c 8CPU (0-1)

Standings after Round 6

5.0 - Houdini 2.0c 64-bit 8CPU
4.5 - Deep Rybka 4.1S 64-bit 8CPU
4.0 - IvanHoe 9.46h 64-bit 8CPU
4.0 - Vitruvius 1.11C 64-bit 8CPU
4.0 - Deep Hiarcs 14 8CPU
3.5 - Stockfish 2.3.1 64-bit 8CPU
3.5 - Critter 1.6a 64-bit 8CPU
3.5 - DeepSaros 3.0 64-bit 8CPU
3.5 - Bouquet 1.5 64-bit 8CPU
3.5 - Sting SF PV 120629 64-bit 8CPU
3.5 - Deep Shredder 12 64-bit 8CPU
3.5 - Spark 1.0 64-bit 8CPU
3.0 - Naum 4.2 64-bit 8CPU
3.0 - Chiron 1.1a 64-bit 8CPU
3.0 - Deep Junior 13.3 64-bit 8CPU
3.0 - Zappa Mexico II 64-bit 8CPU
3.0 - Deep Sjeng WC2008 64-bit 8CPU
3.0 - Jonny 4.00 8CPU
2.5 - Protector 1.4.0 64-bit 8CPU
2.5 - Deep Onno 1.2.70 64-bit 8CPU
2.5 - MinkoChess 1.3 64-bit 8CPU
2.5 - Crafty 23.5 64-bit 8CPU
2.0 - Tornado 4.88 64-bit 8CPU
2.0 - BugChess2 1.9 64-bit 8CPU
2.0 - Arminius 2012-08-14 8CPU
1.5 - Bright 0.5c 8CPU
1.5 - Gaviota 0.85.1 64-bit 8CPU
1.0 - Arasan 15.0 64-bit 8CPU

Round 6 PGN - http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... p?id=27630

Graham Banks · Post by **Graham Banks** » Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:19 pm

Round 7 Pairings

Houdini 2.0c v Ivanhoe 9.46h
Vitruvius 1.11C v Deep Rybka 4.1s
Sting SF PV 120629 v Deep Hiarcs 14
Spark 1.0 v Critter 1.6a
Deep Shredder 12 v Bouquet 1.5
Deep Sjeng WC2008 v DeepSaros 3.0
Stockfish 2.3.1 v Naum 4.2
Jonny 4.00 v Chiron 1.1a
Zappa Mexico II v Deep Junior 13.3
MinkoChess 1.3 v Protector 1.4.0
BugChess2 1.9 v Deep Onno 1.2.70
Crafty 23.5 v Arminius 2012-08-14
Bright 0.5c v Tornado 4.88
Arasan 15.0 v Gaviota 0.85.1

The tournament can be followed live move by move in Playchess or in TLCV (GrahamCCRL.dyndns.org Port 16083).

S.Taylor · Post by **S.Taylor** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:12 am

Is deep Hiarcs already in the league (playing strength-wise) of some of the clone suspected engines? And without using any of their code?

Graham Banks · Post by **Graham Banks** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:27 am

S.Taylor wrote:Is deep Hiarcs already in the league (playing strength-wise) of some of the clone suspected engines? And without using any of their code?

Early days in Deep Hiarcs 14 4CPU testing, but here are the CCRL 40/40 4CPU ratings to date.

Code: Select all

CCRL 40/40 Rating List - 4-CPU engines
416346 games played by 1239 programs, run by 18 testers
Ponder off, General books (up to 12 moves), 3-4-5 piece EGTB
Time control: Equivalent to 40 moves in 40 minutes on Athlon 64 X2 4600+ (2.4 GHz)
Computed on October 1, 2012 with Bayeselo based on 416'346 games
Tested by CCRL team, 2005-2012, http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/

Rank                Engine                 Elo   +    -   Score  AvOp  Games
 1 Houdini 2.0c 64-bit 4CPU             3249  +15  -15  66.1% -112.2  1221
   Houdini 1.5a 64-bit 4CPU             3242  +20  -20  67.2% -121.2   695
 2 Critter 1.6a 64-bit 4CPU             3205  +21  -21  59.7%  -64.9   566
 3 Stockfish 2.2.2 64-bit 4CPU          3200  +16  -16  60.6%  -70.7  1041
   Critter 1.2 64-bit 4CPU              3198  +18  -18  58.9%  -60.0   762
 4 Rybka 4 64-bit 4CPU                  3198  +14  -14  61.3%  -79.4  1439
   Rybka 4.1 64-bit 4CPU                3196  +14  -14  59.4%  -61.6  1365
   Critter 1.4 64-bit 4CPU              3194  +18  -18  61.2%  -74.3   791
   Stockfish 2.0.1 64-bit 4CPU          3178  +23  -23  56.4%  -43.7   514
   Stockfish 2.3 64-bit 4CPU            3173  +40  -39  55.8%  -38.4   163
   Rybka 3 64-bit 4CPU                  3165  +13  -13  72.8% -167.7  1795
   Rybka 3 Human 64-bit 4CPU            3164  +36  -35  63.8%  -99.6   213
   Stockfish 2.1.1 64-bit 4CPU          3162  +25  -25  54.7%  -31.4   406
   Stockfish 1.9.1 64-bit 4CPU          3157  +22  -22  62.2%  -87.0   570
 5 IvanHoe 9.46h 64-bit 4CPU            3155  +17  -17  55.6%  -36.7   894
   Vitruvius 1.11C 64-bit 4CPU          3153  +19  -19  53.5%  -22.3   692
   Stockfish 1.8 64-bit 4CPU            3149  +19  -19  63.9%  -99.5   750
   Stockfish 1.7.1 64-bit 4CPU          3148  +18  -18  60.9%  -76.3   844
   Critter 1.01 64-bit 4CPU             3133  +33  -33  49.8%   +0.1   229
   Critter 0.90 64-bit 4CPU             3128  +30  -30  47.7%  +14.1   286
 6 Hiarcs 14 4CPU                       3112  +32  -32  46.9%  +21.9   243
 7 Naum 4.2 64-bit 4CPU                 3110  +12  -12  50.7%   -5.8  1885
 8 Chiron 1.1a 64-bit 4CPU              3101  +24  -24  45.3%  +29.6   440
   Naum 4.1 64-bit 4CPU                 3096  +27  -27  61.0%  -77.5   376
   Naum 4 64-bit 4CPU                   3083  +16  -16  62.5%  -86.9  1056
 9 Deep Fritz 13 4CPU                   3080  +22  -22  41.1%  +56.5   521
   Critter 0.80 64-bit 4CPU             3078  +34  -34  52.2%  -16.0   226
   Stockfish 1.6.3 64-bit 4CPU          3074  +23  -22  60.9%  -76.2   542
   Bouquet 1.4 64-bit 4CPU              3068  +45  -45  49.2%   +4.4   122
10 Deep Junior 13 64-bit 4CPU           3066  +16  -16  43.8%  +41.9   976
   Deep Junior 13.3 64-bit 4CPU         3061  +22  -22  38.8%  +78.1   542
11 Spike 1.4 Leiden 4CPU                3058  +13  -13  42.7%  +49.3  1520
12 Deep Shredder 12 64-bit OA On 4CPU   3057  +11  -11  49.4%   +3.6  2297
   Rybka 2.3.2a 64-bit 4CPU             3054  +14  -14  68.6% -133.2  1561
   Deep Junior 12.5 64-bit 4CPU         3052  +21  -21  47.1%  +20.8   594
   Deep Shredder 12 64-bit OA Off 4CPU  3044  +31  -31  59.1%  -61.7   268
   Deep Fritz 11 4CPU                   3025  +27  -27  54.2%  -29.9   335
   Hiarcs 13.2 4CPU                     3021  +17  -17  40.2%  +69.0   939
13 Protector 1.4.0 64-bit 4CPU          3021  +21  -21  38.3%  +80.6   609
   Deep Fritz 12 4CPU                   3020  +32  -32  46.7%  +23.5   255
14 Zappa Mexico II 64-bit 4CPU          3008  +10  -10  49.2%   +3.7  2947
   Rybka 2.1 64-bit 4CPU                3007  +35  -34  73.1% -172.1   258
   Rybka 2.2n2 64-bit 4CPU              3006  +19  -19  66.1% -116.0   815
   Stockfish 1.5.1 64-bit 4CPU          3003  +23  -23  53.7%  -25.1   495
   Naum 3.1 64-bit 4CPU                 3001  +17  -17  57.7%  -56.6   986
15 Spark 1.0 64-bit 4CPU                2999  +17  -17  38.0%  +83.4   919
   Zappa Mexico 64-bit 4CPU             2990  +15  -15  63.0%  -91.5  1242
   Naum 3 64-bit 4CPU                   2989  +18  -18  62.0%  -87.0   830
   Protector 1.3.6 64-bit 4CPU          2982  +35  -35  45.5%  +28.1   223
   Stockfish 1.4 64-bit 4CPU            2980  +16  -16  56.0%  -44.3  1133
   Zap!Chess Zanzibar 64-bit 4CPU       2973  +20  -20  64.6%  -98.7   678
   Spark 0.4 64-bit 4CPU                2965  +24  -24  36.1%  +99.5   493
16 Onno 1.2.70 64-bit 4CPU              2962  +27  -27  50.4%   -1.3   348
   Spark 0.3 64-bit 4CPU                2956  +21  -21  46.5%  +22.9   572
17 Deep Sjeng WC2008 64-bit 4CPU        2955  +12  -12  45.4%  +32.8  2046
18 Thinker 5.4C Inert 64-bit 4CPU       2952  +14  -14  49.1%   +6.6  1552
   Thinker 5.4D Inert 64-bit 4CPU       2952  +29  -29  47.6%  +15.9   296
   Deep Shredder 11 64-bit 4CPU         2944  +11  -11  52.7%  -20.9  2391
   Deep Sjeng 3.0 64-bit 4CPU           2936  +21  -21  47.5%  +19.2   632
   Thinker 5.4a Inert 64-bit 4CPU       2933  +22  -22  47.3%  +20.9   560
   Hiarcs 12.1 4CPU                     2931  +14  -14  42.0%  +54.8  1467
19 Toga II 1.4.1SE 4CPU                 2931  +12  -12  49.0%   +7.3  2092
   Naum 2.2 64-bit 4CPU                 2927  +17  -17  55.9%  -40.8   998
20 Bright 0.4a 4CPU                     2924  +14  -14  49.9%   +1.3  1415
   Glaurung 2.2 64-bit 4CPU             2923  +17  -17  50.0%   -0.8  1013
   Bright 0.5c 4CPU                     2919  +38  -38  45.9%  +30.6   194
   Hiarcs 12 4CPU                       2919  +14  -14  49.9%   +2.4  1494
   Hiarcs Paderborn 2007 4CPU           2917  +17  -18  43.9%  +41.8   892
   Hiarcs 12 Sharpen PV On 4CPU         2916  +20  -19  54.0%  -29.4   722
   Tornado 4.88 64-bit 4CPU             2913  +40  -40  55.1%  -34.7   166
   Deep Fritz 10.1 4CPU                 2912  +16  -17  51.9%  -14.1  1048
   Toga II 1.4 beta5c 4CPU              2910  +16  -16  51.8%  -13.6   999
   MinkoChess 1.3 64-bit 4CPU           2900  +44  -43  53.6%  -26.6   139
   Hiarcs 11.1 4CPU                     2899  +16  -16  52.5%  -18.7  1120
   Glaurung 2.1 64-bit 4CPU             2895  +19  -19  40.9%  +67.2   803
   Naum 2.1 64-bit 4CPU                 2885  +20  -20  53.8%  -25.6   699
   Hiarcs 11 4CPU                       2884  +31  -31  53.4%  -25.3   281
   Hiarcs 11.2 4CPU                     2884  +25  -25  46.4%  +25.8   455
   Crafty 23.4 64-bit 4CPU              2879  +41  -41  49.1%   +4.2   164
21 Loop M1-T 64-bit 4CPU                2871  +11  -11  43.2%  +46.3  2447
   Zap!Chess Paderborn 64-bit 4CPU      2869  +23  -22  65.2% -109.0   558
22 Crafty 23.3 64-bit 4CPU              2865  +28  -28  45.0%  +35.3   360
   Bright 0.3a 4CPU                     2855  +17  -17  43.2%  +48.9  1005
   Loop 13.6 (Loop 2007) 64-bit 4CPU    2855  +21  -21  50.3%   -1.5   642
   Glaurung 2.0.1 64-bit 4CPU           2850  +16  -16  44.1%  +40.4  1144
   Deep Shredder 10 64-bit 4CPU         2849  +16  -16  50.4%   -2.6  1134
   BugChess2 1.9 64-bit 4CPU            2848  +46  -46  45.8%  +27.1   132
   Scorpio 2.7.5 64-bit 4CPU            2848  +60  -61  45.0%  +31.3    70
   Deep Fritz 10 4CPU                   2847  +18  -18  49.0%   +6.8   826
23 Jonny 4.00 4CPU                      2841  +36  -36  42.5%  +53.1   219
   Deep Junior 10 4CPU                  2823  +13  -13  43.9%  +46.3  1875
   Crafty 23.1 64-bit 4CPU              2822  +31  -31  48.6%  +12.1   291
   Bright 0.2c 4CPU                     2821  +19  -19  42.0%  +56.1   764
   Thinker 5.2I Passive 64-bit 4CPU     2810  +33  -33  51.6%  -12.7   243
   Deep Sjeng 2.7 4CPU                  2795  +17  -17  41.1%  +63.8  1020
   Glaurung 1.2.1 64-bit 4CPU           2774  +17  -18  39.0%  +78.7   948
   Crafty 23.0 64-bit 4CPU              2770  +17  -17  39.2%  +80.5  1072
   Gaviota 0.85.1 64-bit 4CPU           2748  +69  -72  32.3% +132.1    62
24 Scorpio 2.0 4CPU                     2741  +20  -21  34.0% +117.7   711
   Scorpio 2.1 64-bit 4CPU              2729  +24  -25  35.4% +109.3   516
25 Gaviota 0.83 64-bit 4CPU             2659  +24  -24  51.8%  -13.4   500
26 Pharaon 3.5.1 4CPU                   2627  +35  -36  31.0% +139.0   229

S.Taylor · Post by **S.Taylor** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:47 am

I can't remember, where does it stand in comparrison with earliest "clones", of Robbo/ippo and the like etc?

(wow! i see it is still a little below Rybka 3. [however, if it is only one that is considered clean, then that might be a special achievement])

Graham Banks · Post by **Graham Banks** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:35 am

S.Taylor wrote:.........where does it stand in comparrison with earliest "clones", of Robbo/ippo and the like etc?

No idea, but it's generally accepted that Mark Uniacke is an honest author, in that his engine is "original".

Matthias Gemuh · Post by **Matthias Gemuh** » Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:00 am

S.Taylor wrote:Is deep Hiarcs already in the league (playing strength-wise) of some of the clone suspected engines? And without using any of their code?

Any proof of "without using any of their code" ?

Super Tournament 8CPU (live broadcasts)

Re: Round 5 Pairings

Re: Round 5 Pairings

Re: Round 5 Pairings

Round 6 Results and Standings

Round 7 Pairings

Re: Round 7 Pairings

Re: Round 7 Pairings

Re: Round 7 Pairings

Re: Round 7 Pairings

Re: Round 7 Pairings