Let us , programers, express ourselves

[wgarvin]

I think maybe what you meant to say was "I returned from my 24 hour ban, the second ban I had received in two days for being disruptive. I posted stackOVERFLOW thread which I had already posted several times and which the moderators had already deleted several times. This time, the moderators didn't notice it for 10 hours."

To me that would be the more honest narrative, anyway. I don't want to be part of your little drama here, so please just forget that I ever asked you any questions.

Also, if you are on any medications, please check and make sure you took them on schedule, because your version of recent events seems nearly delusional.

[Daniel Shawul]

I think maybe what you meant to say was "I returned from my 24 hour ban, the second ban I had received in two days for being disruptive. I posted stackOVERFLOW thread which I had already posted several times and which the moderators had already deleted several times. This time, the moderators didn't notice it for 10 hours."

To me that would be the more honest narrative, anyway. I don't want to be part of your little drama here, so please just forget that I ever asked you any questions.

Also, if you are on any medications, please check and make sure you took them on schedule, because your version of recent events seems nearly delusional.

You lied outright. I notified you to not post in that thread but you are denying it.

[michiguel]

Again you locked my stackOVERFLOW thread?? Wylie came in running to get it banned and I told him don't post your answers to me in that thread, because I asked you in a different thread. Then I deleted my post that I stated that. You can ask him if you want, he simply wanted to infest my stackOVERFLOW thread and you are eagerly waiting for an EXCUSE.

It was locked temporarily to move contents to the "poll" thread, where WE ASKED to keep the discussion so it won't spread throughout the forum. Now the thread was removed.

Miguel

Where are you? Playing hide and seek until I post stackOVERFLOW thread ? Trust me I will eventually, but you should have the decency to let me know of your change of decision after 10 hours just because some crazy guy comes in and pollutes a perfectly fine thread.

I have shit to do in my work. Do you think I am guarding your posts 24/7? You S.O. thread was going to be deleted regardless. After we saw it, it took time to write a longer response (that you are completely ignoring), mail to the other mods, make sure they agree, and post it. After that, I proceeded to sanitize the thread, move some content an delete it. Basically, that last explanation was trying to see if you finally understood why we made the decision. We tried before, and failed, repeatedly. Wylie's posts has nothing to do with the decision of deleting it.

Miguel

[Daniel Shawul]

I don't care about your shit . What part of the charter does the stackOVERFLOW thread violate? You only said everyone one KNOWS about it. So does everyone know about STRCPY. So why didn't you delte the strcpy thread or anyother thread that every programer already knows about?

[michiguel]

I don't care about your shit . What part of the charter does the stackOVERFLOW thread violate? You only said everyone one KNOWS about it. So does everyone know about STRCPY. So why didn't you delte the strcpy thread or anyother thread that every programer already knows about?

We already answered you.
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 6&start=44
That is enough time wasted.

Miguel

[Daniel Shawul]

I don't care about your shit . What part of the charter does the stackOVERFLOW thread violate? You only said everyone one KNOWS about it. So does everyone know about STRCPY. So why didn't you delte the strcpy thread or anyother thread that every programer already knows about?

We already answered you.
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 6&start=44
That is enough time wasted.

Miguel

And I already replied to you there that the reason you gave that everybody KNOWS about it is plain stupid. Everybody knows about STRCPY and yet you don't delete it , why?
You are looking for an EXCUSE to delete my post.

[michiguel]

I don't care about your shit . What part of the charter does the stackOVERFLOW thread violate? You only said everyone one KNOWS about it. So does everyone know about STRCPY. So why didn't you delte the strcpy thread or anyother thread that every programer already knows about?

We already answered you.
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 6&start=44
That is enough time wasted.

Miguel

And I already replied to you there that the reason you gave that everybody KNOWS about it is plain stupid. Everybody knows about STRCPY and yet you don't delete it , why?
You are looking for an EXCUSE to delete my post.

Unbelievably, you chose again to post a new thread, and was deleted again. Our patience has a limit.

Miguel

[Ryan Benitez]

I don't care about your shit . What part of the charter does the stackOVERFLOW thread violate? You only said everyone one KNOWS about it. So does everyone know about STRCPY. So why didn't you delte the strcpy thread or anyother thread that every programer already knows about?

We already answered you.
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 6&start=44
That is enough time wasted.

Miguel

And I already replied to you there that the reason you gave that everybody KNOWS about it is plain stupid. Everybody knows about STRCPY and yet you don't delete it , why?
You are looking for an EXCUSE to delete my post.

Unbelievably, you chose again to post a new thread, and was deleted again. Our patience has a limit.

Miguel

You let some guy launch personal insults at Daniel but think it just to delete the stackOVERFLOW thread that is as far as I can tell harmless?

[mar]

You let some guy launch personal insults at Daniel but think it just to delete the stackOVERFLOW thread that is as far as I can tell harmless?

It's funny how some guys pop up just to pour some oil into a "discussion" just to fuel a flamewar
There's a term for these

[wgarvin]

You let some guy launch personal insults at Daniel but think it just to delete the stackOVERFLOW thread that is as far as I can tell harmless?

It's funny how some guys pop up just to pour some oil into a "discussion" just to fuel a flamewar
There's a term for these

If by "some guy" he means me, then he appears not to have noticed that it was Daniel launching the insults, calling other people liars, asking them questions and then claiming he said not to answer them, and generally causing a ruckus.

At least initially, his beef seemed to be something about the strcpy discussion, but now it seems more like Daniel wants to pick a fight with the moderators for reasons I can't understand. The stackOVERFLOW message is just the excuse he has chosen, as soon as they asked him not to create a new thread he just started trying to create that one over and over because he knew the mods would eventually have no choice but to ban him.