Milos wrote: ↑Fri Feb 12, 2021 1:44 am
You are a fanboy coz you are totally delusional about the performance of your favorite brand. Basically iSheep only look at Geekbench that is the least relevant and crappy benchmark that exists and the one where Apple pumps its performance.
Ryzen 5000 mobile top range CPUs (like 5700G or 5980HS) are better single core than M1 and in multicore are 50-80% stronger. M1 graphics/AI performance is a joke. In chess (SF-NNUE) gap is 30% single core and 120% multicore in favor of mobile AMD.
Some software just available on Windows you say? You don't even seem to be aware of how large laptop gaming community is. Good luck running any game on M1.
And all this M1 performance comes from advanced technology node, not superior architecture and other marketing BS Apple is selling to its iSheep.
When AMD moves in next gen to 5nm high-end performance gap is only gonna increase.
Ah let the hate flow thru you.
If you just choose to ignore bunch of other standard benchmarks like SPEC, then you do you. In SPEC It's almost on par with 5950X in single thread ffs! And attacking Geekbench is probably one of Apple haters' favorite pasttime, even though most of the arguments are completely unfounded. The node advantage is also not that great of an argument, given that a better process doesn't really give that much in terms of single thread. The reason I care mostly about single thread is that adding more cores is easy, but having good core design is much harder.
Are you seriously attacking the graphics/AI capability of a chip found in an ultrabook? Once Apple chip gets scaled up, I'd be very surprised if it doesn't beat out anything else in the market, yes, even in SF-NNUE.
To be fair, yes, if you play heavy PC games, you'd be better served not getting a mac, but if I played games, I'd rather just get a desktop at that point.