Ah, I didn't search for CCCP logos so they didn't influence mePK wrote:Thank You for the logo! So it was possible to come up with something different than a red flag, a red tank etc.
CCCP - bad joke strikes back
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 4556
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: CCCP - bad joke strikes back
Re: CCCP - bad joke strikes back
Though a little late, here are the results...Though statistically insignificant, my results indicate that both of your engines are around the same strength. They played against almost the same opponents with hopeless playing against 2 additional opponents (2 against 1, and 1 againt 2nd).
371 CCCP ver 10105 2092 88 88 59 54% 2042 10%
385 Hopeless047 2052 88 88 61 51% 2039 10%
426 Brainless 041908 1942 86 90 60 36% 2047 18%
371 CCCP ver 10105 2092 88 88 59 54% 2042 10%
385 Hopeless047 2052 88 88 61 51% 2039 10%
426 Brainless 041908 1942 86 90 60 36% 2047 18%
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:23 am
- Location: Warsza
Re: CCCP - bad joke strikes back
thanks Tony
this is in tune with what I said - only I compare CCCP with Hopeless 0.49, which is a little stronger than 0.47. hopeless 0.49 did make it to ChessWar E, whereas 0.47 failed to do so twice.
this is in tune with what I said - only I compare CCCP with Hopeless 0.49, which is a little stronger than 0.47. hopeless 0.49 did make it to ChessWar E, whereas 0.47 failed to do so twice.
Pawel Koziol
http://www.pkoziol.cal24.pl/rodent/rodent.htm
http://www.pkoziol.cal24.pl/rodent/rodent.htm