FGRL, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 9. Nemorino 6.00, 43. Weiss 1.2, 50. Koivisto 3.0, 76. Halogen 7

[fastgm]

FGRL rating list - 60 sec + 0.6 sec

Nemorino 6.00 (+244 to Nemorino 5.28)
Weiss 1.2 (+98 to Weiss 1.1)
Koivisto 3.0 (New: 2780)
Halogen 7 (New: 2445)

http://www.fastgm.de

[Terje]

Thanks for testing Weiss! Biggest improvement of any list for 1.2

A win against SF this time

[fastgm]

Here the game:
[pgn][Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2020.10.28"] [Round "1"] [White "Stockfish 12"] [Black "Weiss 1.2"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E14"] [PlyCount "98"] [EventDate "2020.??.??"] [TimeControl "60"] 1. d4 {book} Nf6 {book} 2. c4 {book} e6 {book} 3. Nf3 {book} b6 {book} 4. e3 { book} Bb7 {book} 5. Bd3 {book} Bb4+ {book} 6. Nbd2 {book} Ne4 {book} 7. O-O { book} f5 {book} 8. Qc2 {book} Nxd2 {book} 9. Nxd2 {1.06/19 2.4s} O-O {-0.72/18 2.8s} 10. a3 {1.41/20 1.8s} Bd6 {-0.57/20 3.7s} 11. b4 {1.36/18 1.3s} Bxh2+ { 4.73/19 1.9s} 12. Kxh2 {-6.99/26 3.3s} Qh4+ {6.06/22 2.8s} 13. Kg1 {-6.99/4 0} Bxg2 {6.25/22 2.6s} 14. f3 {-7.17/25 1.4s} Bh3 {7.47/20 1.6s} 15. Ne4 {-7.21/ 25 1.4s} fxe4 {9.63/21 2.1s} 16. Bxe4 {-7.21/26 0.97s} Qg3+ {9.76/21 2.2s} 17. Kh1 {-7.25/27 1.5s} Bxf1 {9.88/22 2.5s} 18. Qh2 {-7.44/26 1.9s} Qxh2+ {9.74/23 2.3s} 19. Kxh2 {-7.44/9 0.001s} c6 {9.92/22 1.6s} 20. c5 {-7.25/27 1.0s} Bc4 { 10.02/23 2.5s} 21. f4 {-7.81/28 13} bxc5 {10.31/22 1.7s} 22. dxc5 {-7.66/22 0. 71s} a5 {10.04/24 2.6s} 23. Rb1 {-7.59/23 0.90s} axb4 {11.10/19 1.3s} 24. Rxb4 {-7.48/21 1.4s} Bd5 {11.78/21 1.5s} 25. Bd3 {-6.71/20 1.1s} Na6 {11.65/21 2.0s} 26. Bxa6 {-7.32/24 4.5s} Rxa6 {11.85/21 2.1s} 27. e4 {-7.43/25 6.2s} Ba2 { 11.95/19 1.4s} 28. Kg3 {-6.78/22 3.9s} Ra5 {11.98/21 3.6s} 29. Rb7 {-7.06/21 2. 2s} Rd8 {12.38/20 2.5s} 30. Kg4 {-6.98/21 4.6s} Bc4 {12.67/20 3.2s} 31. Kf3 { -7.13/22 4.0s} Rxc5 {13.30/18 1.0s} 32. Be3 {-6.86/21 0.68s} Ra5 {13.85/19 1.8s } 33. Bc1 {-7.32/22 2.1s} Rb5 {14.32/20 2.0s} 34. Rxb5 {-7.21/20 1.1s} Bxb5 { 15.08/20 1.9s} 35. Ke3 {-7.63/23 7.2s} Ra8 {15.84/20 0.96s} 36. Kd4 {-7.97/25 2.3s} h5 {16.98/20 0.96s} 37. Bb2 {-8.56/22 3.5s} h4 {20.00/21 0.95s} 38. Ke3 { -8.77/18 0.23s} Ra4 {20.98/21 1.2s} 39. Kf3 {-9.57/19 0.52s} h3 {22.46/20 1.2s} 40. Kg3 {-15.43/17 1.1s} Bf1 {23.91/22 1.2s} 41. e5 {-10.79/16 0.33s} Rc4 { 37.23/20 1.6s} 42. Bc1 {-#16/21 1.1s} Rxc1 {#15/25 1.2s} 43. f5 {-#14/22 0.068s } Rc2 {#13/26 1.3s} 44. a4 {-#12/27 0.17s} h2 {#11/26 0.95s} 45. f6 {-#10/33 0. 18s} h1=Q {#9/36 0.89s} 46. f7+ {-#8/170 0.20s} Kxf7 {#7/127 0.22s} 47. a5 { -#6/245 0.14s} Rc3+ {#5/127 0.012s} 48. Kf2 {-#4/245 0.018s} Qf3+ {#3/127 0. 008s} 49. Ke1 {-#2/245 0.012s} Qe2# {#1/127 0.006s, Black mates} 0-1[/pgn]

[Terje]

Cool game, SF misses the greek gift and the game is practically over after move 11

[carldaman]

Hmm..., an issue with NNUE and fast TCs, I wonder. I seriously doubt classical SF would have missed the opponent's Greek gift sac in that same position.

[Alayan]

Stockfish losses to much weaker engines at bullet are always very similar to this. Some sacrificial tactic missed. This also happened to SF classical.