SmallBrain vs Stockfish 3 50 at T/C 15/10

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson

User avatar
Guenther
Posts: 4584
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
Location: Regensburg, Germany
Full name: Guenther Simon

Re: SmallBrain vs Stockfish 3 50 at T/C 15/10

Post by Guenther »

Chessqueen wrote: Fri Jul 01, 2022 9:21 am
Guenther wrote: Fri Jul 01, 2022 9:00 am

You really grasped nothing from my post lol.

Read it again... SF 3 is superior to Smallbrain 4.0 and everything we already know tells us this
But to know if SF 3 is 150 or 200 or even slightly more above Smallbrain 4.0, this needs a lot of games. (also against different opponents)

It's totally useless to talk to you.
No Stockfish is only about 130 Elo stronger I already tested it against these group of engines Smallbrain was the last engine that I tested against :roll:

SmallBrain 4.0 64-bit
Nu-Chess 1.0 64-bit
Deep Junior Yokohama 64-bit
tomitankChess 5.1 64-bit
Atlas 3.91 64-bit
EXchess 7.97b 64-bit
Nalwald 15 64-bit
The Baron 3.44 64-bit
Gaviota 1.0 64-bit
OliThink 5.10.1 64-bit
Well, we all know you would have made at least 100 posts out of those tests, if you had done them.
So no, you just trolled and lied again. Why are you here?
https://rwbc-chess.de

trollwatch:
Chessqueen + chessica
Chessqueen
Posts: 5479
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: SmallBrain vs Stockfish 3 50 at T/C 15/10

Post by Chessqueen »

Guenther wrote: Fri Jul 01, 2022 9:40 am
Chessqueen wrote: Fri Jul 01, 2022 9:21 am
Guenther wrote: Fri Jul 01, 2022 9:00 am

You really grasped nothing from my post lol.

Read it again... SF 3 is superior to Smallbrain 4.0 and everything we already know tells us this
But to know if SF 3 is 150 or 200 or even slightly more above Smallbrain 4.0, this needs a lot of games. (also against different opponents)

It's totally useless to talk to you.
No Stockfish is only about 130 Elo stronger I already tested it against these group of engines Smallbrain was the last engine that I tested against :roll:

SmallBrain 4.0 64-bit
Nu-Chess 1.0 64-bit
Deep Junior Yokohama 64-bit
tomitankChess 5.1 64-bit
Atlas 3.91 64-bit
EXchess 7.97b 64-bit
Nalwald 15 64-bit
The Baron 3.44 64-bit
Gaviota 1.0 64-bit
OliThink 5.10.1 64-bit
Well, we all know you would have made at least 100 posts out of those tests, if you had done them.
So no, you just trolled and lied again. Why are you here?
Lets make a bet of $500.00 and I will send it to anybody here, I simply did not posted it here because against the other engines Stockfish 3 only played 10 games against each, and since I thought that Smallbrain was the stronger out of the group I decided to tested it with 60 games vs Stockfish 3, until you came with the remark that I needed at least 1000 games, which is NOT really necessary when a small sample clearly show which engine is superior out of the two since statistically you can always take a small sample, in which the standard error is dependent on sample size, most of the times larger sample sizes produce smaller standard errors, which most of the times give you an estimate with higher precision. but if you take a small sample you can proportionally predict the outcome. You are not the only one who took statistic in this forum. Let me refresh your mind https://byjus.com/maths/standard-error
Forget about memorization of Opening Theories https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DN3381sdcdY