Comparing top players and Niemann

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson

Ferdy
Posts: 4833
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Philippines

Re: Comparing top players and Niemann

Post by Ferdy »

Ferdy wrote: Wed Oct 12, 2022 4:29 am
In the case between magnus and hans (highlighted in yellow), there is a high number of pos which is 30. pos is the number of positions that are not yet winning/losing. That means there is a long battle in this game when the position is not yet winning for one side, hans got 83.3% match from the top 1 move of Stockfish 15. Opening moves from 1 to 11 are not included. When the position is already winning according to the engine [300, 32000], hans got 66.7% top 1 move match from the engine. In 6.7% or 1 of 15 wpos as in indicated by wfail%, hans failed to maintain a winning position. I will show later how magnus performs on this game.
Magnus - hans comparison.

Image

Magnus blundered from a bad position b6 and b7, and played bad moves from dubious position with m5.
Ferdy
Posts: 4833
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Philippines

Re: Comparing top players and Niemann

Post by Ferdy »

Top players so far who played like an engine. No blunder, no mistakes, no dubious moves, no equal moves from good position and a high top 1 engine move choice match. The players under the name column won the game.

The table is sorted by t1% and wt1%.

Image
chessica
Posts: 572
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2022 11:30 pm
Full name: Esmeralda Pinto

Re: Comparing top players and Niemann

Post by chessica »

from here: https://www.uschesschamps.com/2022-us-c ... gs-results

nothing new under the sun. :)

Ranking after round 11

Rank Name Score M/F Rating TPR W-We 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1 GM Caruana, Fabiano 7.5 M 2763 2785 +0.40 ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 1 1 ½ ½ ½ ½
2 GM Robson, Ray 7.0 M 2690 2780 +1.34 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 ½ ½ ½
3 GM Dominguez Perez, Leinier 6.5 M 2747 2725 -0.27 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 1
4 GM Sevian, Samuel 6.5 M 2684 2724 +0.66 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1
5 GM Shankland, Sam 6.0 M 2712 2689 -0.35 ½ ½ ½ 0 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½
6 GM Xiong, Jeffery 6.0 M 2690 2698 +0.09 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½
7 GM Liang, Awonder 6.0 M 2608 2713 +1.52 ½ 0 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½
8 GM So, Wesley 5.5 M 2774 2674 -1.48 ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 1
9 GM Niemann, Hans Moke 5.5 M 2699 2674 -0.35 1 ½ ½ 0 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ 1 1
10 GM Swiercz, Dariusz 5.5 M 2652 2689 +0.56 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ ½ 0
11 GM Aronian, Levon 4.5 M 2755 2604 -2.27 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½
12 GM Lenderman, Aleksandr 4.5 M 2535 2623 +1.21 ½ ½ 0 1 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 0
13 GM Yoo, Christopher Woojin 4.0 M 2563 2580 +0.21 0 1 1 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 0 ½ 0
14 GM Moradiabadi, Elshan 2.0 M 2534 2427 -1.27 0 1 0 ½ 0 0 0 0 ½ 0 0