I would simply love to see what happens if a reputable GM had 6 games vs the strongest machine (or the best Rybka), with the machine giving even QUEEN odds to te GM.
Maybe that would seem bad manners as it is like not resigning, in the mere hope that the opponent will make a stupid blunder. And I would feel it unlikely something would not go wrong in 6 games.
However, to make it more closer to reality, how about just rook odds? EVERYONE is no doubt very sure that the GM would win 6-0.
But _I_ would estimate around 4.5-1.5 to the GM.
Atleast, THIS could be the goal to defeat this.
I would consider 5.5 to be a total victory, however we might be surprised how hard he has to fight for the "expected minimum" of 4.5.
(I'm not saying that the GM SHOULD not win 6-0. Maybe with practice in this setting, it would be easier. I'm also not talking about blitz nor long times, necesarily, But atleast 45 min per game).
Queen odds? No Rook odds! vs GM, why not?
Moderator: Ras
-
S.Taylor
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
-
pedrox
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:07 am
- Location: Basque Country (Spain)
Re: Queen odds? No Rook odds! vs GM, why not?
With a rook advantage I can easily win 4.5 of 6 and I am not GM.
-
Terry McCracken
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: Queen odds? No Rook odds! vs GM, why not?
Are you serious?S.Taylor wrote:I would simply love to see what happens if a reputable GM had 6 games vs the strongest machine (or the best Rybka), with the machine giving even QUEEN odds to te GM.
Maybe that would seem bad manners as it is like not resigning, in the mere hope that the opponent will make a stupid blunder. And I would feel it unlikely something would not go wrong in 6 games.
However, to make it more closer to reality, how about just rook odds? EVERYONE is no doubt very sure that the GM would win 6-0.
But _I_ would estimate around 4.5-1.5 to the GM.
Atleast, THIS could be the goal to defeat this.
I would consider 5.5 to be a total victory, however we might be surprised how hard he has to fight for the "expected minimum" of 4.5.
(I'm not saying that the GM SHOULD not win 6-0. Maybe with practice in this setting, it would be easier. I'm also not talking about blitz nor long times, necesarily, But atleast 45 min per game).
-
S.Taylor
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: Queen odds? No Rook odds! vs GM, why not?
So you think it can not possibly be serious?!Terry McCracken wrote:Are you serious?
A GM cannot easily overreach himself, thinking it is all too easy?
It's as easy as riding a car for 10 hours without an accident, is it?
-
Terry McCracken
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: Queen odds? No Rook odds! vs GM, why not?
Yes it is easy driving a car for 10 hours without an accident...we had to make such trips up in Northern Ontario all the time.S.Taylor wrote:So you think it can not possibly be serious?!Terry McCracken wrote:Are you serious?
A GM cannot easily overreach himself, thinking it is all too easy?
It's as easy as riding a car for 10 hours without an accident, is it?
It is also easy for a GM to crush any program with Night odds let alone a Rook or a Queen.
I can crush any program with Night odds, let alone Rook or preposterous Queen odds.
-
Golem
Re: Queen odds? No Rook odds! vs GM, why not?
A GM will never loose a Queen odd match... A 1400 Elo player can win this easily...
A pawn odd is the most a computer can give to a grand master (for 45 minutes games).
A pawn odd is the most a computer can give to a grand master (for 45 minutes games).
-
S.Taylor
- Posts: 8514
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Jerusalem Israel
Re: Queen odds? No Rook odds! vs GM, why not?
Ah! OK then. So you probably look where you're going then.Terry McCracken wrote:Yes it is easy driving a car for 10 hours without an accident...we had to make such trips up in Northern Ontario all the time.S.Taylor wrote:So you think it can not possibly be serious?!Terry McCracken wrote:Are you serious?
A GM cannot easily overreach himself, thinking it is all too easy?
It's as easy as riding a car for 10 hours without an accident, is it?
It is also easy for a GM to crush any program with Night odds let alone a Rook or a Queen.
I can crush any program with Night odds, let alone Rook or preposterous Queen odds.
-
Terry McCracken
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: Queen odds? No Rook odds! vs GM, why not?
Of courseS.Taylor wrote:Ah! OK then. So you probably look where you're going then.Terry McCracken wrote:Yes it is easy driving a car for 10 hours without an accident...we had to make such trips up in Northern Ontario all the time.S.Taylor wrote:So you think it can not possibly be serious?!Terry McCracken wrote:Are you serious?
A GM cannot easily overreach himself, thinking it is all too easy?
It's as easy as riding a car for 10 hours without an accident, is it?
It is also easy for a GM to crush any program with Night odds let alone a Rook or a Queen.
I can crush any program with Night odds, let alone Rook or preposterous Queen odds.
I wasn't kidding about the 10 hr., drive or anything for that matter.
-
bob
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: Queen odds? No Rook odds! vs GM, why not?
I believe that with queen odds, it would be 6-0 even against a good IM player, much less a GM. The computers are _not_ that good...S.Taylor wrote:I would simply love to see what happens if a reputable GM had 6 games vs the strongest machine (or the best Rybka), with the machine giving even QUEEN odds to te GM.
Maybe that would seem bad manners as it is like not resigning, in the mere hope that the opponent will make a stupid blunder. And I would feel it unlikely something would not go wrong in 6 games.
However, to make it more closer to reality, how about just rook odds? EVERYONE is no doubt very sure that the GM would win 6-0.
But _I_ would estimate around 4.5-1.5 to the GM.
Atleast, THIS could be the goal to defeat this.
I would consider 5.5 to be a total victory, however we might be surprised how hard he has to fight for the "expected minimum" of 4.5.
(I'm not saying that the GM SHOULD not win 6-0. Maybe with practice in this setting, it would be easier. I'm also not talking about blitz nor long times, necesarily, But atleast 45 min per game).
-
Terry McCracken
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: Queen odds? No Rook odds! vs GM, why not?
Why a strong I.M.? An expert should be more than adequate.bob wrote:I believe that with queen odds, it would be 6-0 even against a good IM player, much less a GM. The computers are _not_ that good...S.Taylor wrote:I would simply love to see what happens if a reputable GM had 6 games vs the strongest machine (or the best Rybka), with the machine giving even QUEEN odds to te GM.
Maybe that would seem bad manners as it is like not resigning, in the mere hope that the opponent will make a stupid blunder. And I would feel it unlikely something would not go wrong in 6 games.
However, to make it more closer to reality, how about just rook odds? EVERYONE is no doubt very sure that the GM would win 6-0.
But _I_ would estimate around 4.5-1.5 to the GM.
Atleast, THIS could be the goal to defeat this.
I would consider 5.5 to be a total victory, however we might be surprised how hard he has to fight for the "expected minimum" of 4.5.
(I'm not saying that the GM SHOULD not win 6-0. Maybe with practice in this setting, it would be easier. I'm also not talking about blitz nor long times, necesarily, But atleast 45 min per game).