Nid Hogge wrote:What? ha lol.. I was actually talking to Enrico..Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Hi Nid,
Yep,I am the guy in the avatar after a lot of plastic surgery![]()
Trying to look like better,
Dr.Wael Deeb![]()

Moderator: Ras
Nid Hogge wrote:What? ha lol.. I was actually talking to Enrico..Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Hi Nid,
Yep,I am the guy in the avatar after a lot of plastic surgery![]()
Trying to look like better,
Dr.Wael Deeb![]()
The Rybka 2.2n2 picture (rybka_916kns.jpg) apparently was taken at the end of Round 9 (against Scorpio)Kapaun wrote: By the way, does the Rybka 2.2n2 picture mean that it wasn't R 2.3.2 which won the competition, but the old 2.2 version?
Harvey Williamson wrote:The 2nd beer was Enrico's even I am not that greedy!Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Hi Steve,Steve B wrote:a BEER while in the middle of intense competition??Enrico wrote:Hello everyone.
* hiarcs_xinix.jpg -- Harvey Williamson(HIARCS) enjoys a beer over a game with Tony van Werten (Xinix.)
![]()
Now All Is Clear Regards
Steve
And note that Harvey was holding the beer in stereo mode
http://www.csvn.nl/index.php?option=com ... &Itemid=28Steve B wrote: Solid performance taking clear third Harvey!
we here in Collectors Corner Salute Team Hiarcs and Team Rybka
Both Teams well versed in the rich tradition of Dedicated Chess Computers
Bravissimo Regards
Steve
In fact =3rd was awarded - we both get a trophy - Deep Sjeng had a really great tournament - it lost to Hiarcs - maybe we are its nemesis as we beat it twice now at Leiden, in the same way that Scorpio keeps beating Hiarcs.Spock wrote:http://www.csvn.nl/index.php?option=com ... &Itemid=28Steve B wrote: Solid performance taking clear third Harvey!
we here in Collectors Corner Salute Team Hiarcs and Team Rybka
Both Teams well versed in the rich tradition of Dedicated Chess Computers
Bravissimo Regards
Steve
Hio Steve,
Yes, congratulations and a well deserved 3rd place. But I'm not sure you would say "clear third", they were 3rd equal on points with Deep Sjeng, but got 3rd on a tiebreak system
Actually on BU points ..Hiarcs was clear FirstHarvey Williamson wrote:In fact =3rd was awarded - we both get a trophy - Deep Sjeng had a really great tournament - it lost to Hiarcs - maybe we are its nemesis as we beat it twice now at Leiden, in the same way that Scorpio keeps beating Hiarcs.Spock wrote:http://www.csvn.nl/index.php?option=com ... &Itemid=28Steve B wrote: Solid performance taking clear third Harvey!
we here in Collectors Corner Salute Team Hiarcs and Team Rybka
Both Teams well versed in the rich tradition of Dedicated Chess Computers
Bravissimo Regards
Steve
Hio Steve,
Yes, congratulations and a well deserved 3rd place. But I'm not sure you would say "clear third", they were 3rd equal on points with Deep Sjeng, but got 3rd on a tiebreak system
A shame today was not a bit more exciting after the 3 on = points after day 2. A good tournament for Hiarcs - we played well - draws can happen v anyone at any time. The game v Scorpio was the only one where Hiarcs seemed to play badly.
Here are some pictures I made:Enrico wrote:A few more available now.. A quick note about the movie of Hans solving the Rubiks Cube.. You must right-click it and download it to your computer and then view it...
-elc.
http://jbo.gotdns.com/leiden2007/
* _hiarcs_sjeng_3rd.jpg -- Harvey Williamson (HIARCS) and Gian-Carlo Pascutto (Deep Sjeng) share third place. They will have a tug-of-war for the trophy later...
* _rybka_1st.jpg -- Hans van der Zijden (Rybka) accepts first place trophy from Cock de Gorter.
* _tessa_best_op.jpg -- Best Operator Award goes to Tessa Pijl: Her pick of a favorite snack!
* _winners_picture.jpg -- All prize winners pictured together.
* _zappa_2nd.jpg -- Erdogan Gunes (Zappa) accepts second place trophy.
It does not make sense because 2.2n2 also has a hash bug and here is the proofernest wrote:The Rybka 2.2n2 picture (rybka_916kns.jpg) apparently was taken at the end of Round 9 (against Scorpio)Kapaun wrote: By the way, does the Rybka 2.2n2 picture mean that it wasn't R 2.3.2 which won the competition, but the old 2.2 version?
It seems that the Vasik team previously found a hash bug and preferred to revert from 2.3.2 beta to 2.2n2