M ANSARI wrote:It is hard to guess who would win. It is trying to say who would win if Federer played Borg in a Wimbeldon final. You would be speculating. Personally I think Kasparov would be crushed by a Rybka on fast hardware. That is not to say that Kasparov plays chess poorly ... I think he is the best human chess player ever. But really ... engines and hardware have come a long long way ... and humans simply cannot be expected to compete with today's engines on fast hardware.
Totaly agree with you Majd
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
M ANSARI wrote:It is hard to guess who would win. It is trying to say who would win if Federer played Borg in a Wimbeldon final. You would be speculating. Personally I think Kasparov would be crushed by a Rybka on fast hardware. That is not to say that Kasparov plays chess poorly ... I think he is the best human chess player ever. But really ... engines and hardware have come a long long way ... and humans simply cannot be expected to compete with today's engines on fast hardware.
Look at it this way; How much stronger is Kasparov over Ehlvest? Sorry if my spelling is off a bit...
Kasparov is much stronger and would certainly fair much better, if fully prepared. It's common sense.
M ANSARI wrote:It is hard to guess who would win. It is trying to say who would win if Federer played Borg in a Wimbeldon final. You would be speculating. Personally I think Kasparov would be crushed by a Rybka on fast hardware. That is not to say that Kasparov plays chess poorly ... I think he is the best human chess player ever. But really ... engines and hardware have come a long long way ... and humans simply cannot be expected to compete with today's engines on fast hardware.
Totaly agree with you Majd
I totally disagree in this case...especially the part of Kasparov being crushed.
