CEGT - rating lists from 28th October 2007

[Kirill Kryukov]

That's right, but the CCRL list you are mentioning is not called "Best Single Versions". Good luck, Kirill

[pichy]

Thanks for update! In CEGT 40/4 "Best Single Versions" list the first 10 places are occupied by Rybka, is it normal?

In the CCRL the first 29 places are occupied by rybka

The best non rybka is only place 30:

I preffer the FRC rating list, which only list one version of Rybka

http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404FRC/

http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404/cg ... ons_only=1

1 Rybka 2.3.2a 64-bit 3084 +22 −22 77.1% −192.4 32.3% 812
100.0%
2 Rybka 2.2 64-bit 3028 +21 −21 74.7% −177.0 29.8% 882
54.6%
3 Rybka 2.2n2 64-bit 3026 +24 −23 75.7% −188.2 28.7% 719
51.3%
4 Rybka 2.3.2a 32-bit 3025 +20 −20 73.4% −158.0 34.5% 892
58.0%
5 Rybka 2.1o 64-bit 3022 +26 −25 75.4% −183.8 28.4% 595
77.8%
6 Rybka 2.1c 64-bit 3007 +28 −27 74.7% −178.3 27.5% 512
76.9%
7 Rybka 2.3 LK 32-bit 2994 +21 −21 75.3% −188.2 24.8% 908
52.9%
8 Rybka 2.3.1 32-bit 2993 +15 −15 74.7% −182.0 26.4% 1878
55.0%
9 Rybka 2.2 32-bit 2992 +13 −13 73.8% −174.0 29.0% 2435
64.6%
10 Rybka 1.1 64-bit 2983 +41 −39 79.5% −225.3 22.7% 273
63.9%
11 Rybka 2.3 32-bit 2974 +27 −26 74.9% −182.4 26.7% 570
64.6%
12 Rybka 1.2n 32-bit 2967 +27 −26 67.3% −124.0 28.1% 524
61.0%
13 Rybka 1.2f 32-bit 2963 +13 −13 66.5% −116.3 35.2% 2328
47.6%
14 Rybka 2.1o 32-bit 2963 +13 −13 68.4% −131.9 31.4% 2117
55.7%
15 Rybka 1.2f 32-bit (Contempt +1) 2961 +28 −27 73.0% −167.1 28.0% 510
62.0%
16 Rybka 1.2f 32-bit (Outlook SO) 2953 +45 −43 73.9% −176.5 25.4% 209
51.7%
17 Rybka 2.1c 32-bit 2952 +14 −14 67.1% −123.2 31.4% 1852
50.6%
18 Rybka 2.1c 32-bit (C+1_OSO_RS) 2952 +28 −27 71.4% −158.3 28.1% 509
50.3%
19 Rybka 2.1c 32-bit (Outlook SO) 2952 +28 −27 71.3% −158.4 24.4% 508
54.1%
20 Rybka 1.1 32-bit 2950 +18 −18 65.6% −107.0 38.0% 1073
52.6%
21 Rybka 2.1c 32-bit (C+1 OSO) 2949 +27 −26 70.9% −154.9 25.6% 540
50.9%
22 Rybka 1.2i 32-bit 2948 +24 −23 68.4% −133.8 28.7% 675
57.8%
23 Rybka 1.0 Beta 64-bit 2946 +17 −17 74.4% −179.0 29.7% 1364
71.8%
24 Rybka 2.1c 32-bit (Contempt +1) 2936 +28 −27 69.4% −142.1 26.3% 510
54.6%
25 Rybka 2.1o 32-bit (Outlook SO) 2934 +28 −27 69.1% −140.1 26.9% 510
54.0%
26 Rybka 2.1c 32-bit (Rate Slow) 2931 +34 −33 71.5% −154.5 29.1% 330
57.3%
27 Rybka 2.1c 32-bit (Outlook VO) 2927 +33 −32 69.4% −142.9 25.1% 359
54.3%
28 Rybka 2.1c 32-bit (ETB Small) 2924 +34 −33 70.3% −147.2 27.1% 328
62.5%
29 Rybka 1.01 Beta 13d 2917 +30 −29 67.6% −125.4 31.3% 418
61.2%
30 Hiarcs 11.1 2912 +12 −12 60.5% −72.5 33.1% 2407
60.0%

I the CEGT 40/20 list there are also many rybkas single cpu
They did not calculate the best single version correctly but the top 12 single are rybka and I still see no single processor machine that is above rybka 64 bit.

Maybe Shredder11 can do it but unfortunately they did not test shredder single version or did not test it with enough games to be in the list

13 Rybka 2.3.2a w32 1CPU 2970 12 12 1985 68.4% 2836 36.9%
14 Rybka 1.1 x64 2964 17 17 1768 83.1% 2687 20.4%
16 Rybka 2.3.1 w32 1CPU 2957 24 24 605 72.2% 2791 32.4%
17 Rybka 1.2f x64 2955 18 18 1306 76.5% 2750 27.6%
21 Rybka 2.2 w32 1CPU 2937 17 17 1184 69.0% 2798 34.4%
22 Rybka 1.2f w32 2934 25 25 605 73.1% 2761 27.4%
24 Rybka 2.3 LK w32 1CPU 2920 48 48 154 66.9% 2798 31.2%
25 Rybka 1.01 Beta 13-13d x64 2919 25 25 713 78.6% 2693 24.8%
28 Rybka 2.1c w32 1CPU 2907 23 23 658 68.3% 2773 33.3%
30 Rybka 1.1 w32 2901 16 16 1641 77.1% 2690 25.4%
33 Rybka 1.01 Beta 9 x64 opti 2890 37 37 315 77.0% 2680 24.4%
44 Rybka 1.0 Beta x64 2863 16 16 1238 63.2% 2769 36.6%
52 Fruit 2.3.3f Beta 2839 17 17 981 48.3% 2851 36.7%