Moral sounds great from certain directions... but not from others.GenoM wrote:I just saw I made a mistake in my previous post. So it's edited text:GenoM wrote:If these (purely hypotetical, of course) unpublished in Strelka sources elements of Rybka are unimportant then the damage is already done. So publicising Rybka beta code wouldn't make more damage than is already done.LRoberts wrote: Strelka might have only taken some of Rybka's code and there may be other elements of Rybka 1.0 beta that have not been made public
If they are important, then Strelka is not Rybka and V. Rajlich has not moral right to claim it his own.
Just speculation, of course. Please, do not understand me wrong -- I'm not interrested in reading Rybka sources. I'm not a programmer.
Regards,
Geno
A question [about Strelka and Rybka sources]
Moderator: Ras
-
Rolf
- Posts: 6081
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:14 pm
- Location: Munster, Nuremberg, Princeton
Re: A question [about Strelka and Rybka sources]
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz