H.G.Muller: FRC Winboard_F castle.

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
pedrox
Posts: 1056
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:07 am
Location: Basque Country (Spain)

Re: H.G.Muller: FRC Winboard_F castle.

Post by pedrox »

Now it seems it is OK.

Thanks
User avatar
pedrox
Posts: 1056
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:07 am
Location: Basque Country (Spain)

Re: H.G.Muller: FRC Winboard_F castle.

Post by pedrox »

That advantages you have with the patent on Gotic Chess in the USA?

I am free to do a program that plays such a variant on Winboard_F?

If so, this program can be commercial in the USA?

Pedro
User avatar
hgm
Posts: 28454
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
Location: Amsterdam
Full name: H G Muller

Re: H.G.Muller: FRC Winboard_F castle.

Post by hgm »

I think you are always free to use patented equipment manufactured by someone else, provided you obtained it legally. Patenting only restricts the manufacturing and distribution of materials covered by the patent.

The Gothic Chess patent covers playing of Gothic Chess, i.e. what engines do. Ed Trice and I agreed that a GUI is basically just a display aid, and is not covered by the patent anymore than, say, your video driver or your flat-screen monitor.

So it is the authors of Gothic-Chess engines that have to apply for a license with Ed. Currently his policy for non-commercial engines is very liberal: the license fee is only $1 per year (or $25 for a perpetual license). This allows you to host a version of the engine on your website for download (which you can update), provided it prints the license message. Anyone that downloads it, can then use it for free.

Ed, correct me if I am wrong!
GothicChessInventor

Re: H.G.Muller: FRC Winboard_F castle.

Post by GothicChessInventor »

hgm wrote:I think you are always free to use patented equipment manufactured by someone else, provided you obtained it legally. Patenting only restricts the manufacturing and distribution of materials covered by the patent.

The Gothic Chess patent covers playing of Gothic Chess, i.e. what engines do. Ed Trice and I agreed that a GUI is basically just a display aid, and is not covered by the patent anymore than, say, your video driver or your flat-screen monitor.

So it is the authors of Gothic-Chess engines that have to apply for a license with Ed. Currently his policy for non-commercial engines is very liberal: the license fee is only $1 per year (or $25 for a perpetual license). This allows you to host a version of the engine on your website for download (which you can update), provided it prints the license message. Anyone that downloads it, can then use it for free.

Ed, correct me if I am wrong!
That's basically correct, for engines that will not be sold. If it is for sale, I just ask for a 7.5% "royalty" and to list it for sale at GothicChess.com
GothicChessInventor

Re: H.G.Muller: FRC Winboard_F castle.

Post by GothicChessInventor »

pedrox wrote:That advantages you have with the patent on Gotic Chess in the USA?

I am free to do a program that plays such a variant on Winboard_F?

If so, this program can be commercial in the USA?

Pedro
The idea behind the patent is NOT to stop people from playing and/or programming the game, but to prevent predatory companies (say the chess equivalent of Micro$oft) from coming in and taking over your entire domain.

Look at Netscape, who basically invented internet browsing, then what Miscrosoft tried to do to them.

The licenses are cheap and the 7.5% royalty is a much better deal than you will ever get with, say, a wholesaler or other distributor. Companies like QVC and Target and WallMart take 50% right off the top!