fern wrote:You are very right in that, but still do not know someone capable of resisting the urge to get the last update....
Fdo
The main question to me would be what the update is for- and what problem do you possibly have now that this update would cure. Without knowing that- i would not touch it with a ten foot pole. Anyway, i agree with Ray. If it aint broke.......
Best,
This is a terrible nonsense.
Here is my view.
Any new update is bettere than the versions before.
But not every new update is necessary for every single user. It depends on hardware and configuaration and also what you want to do exactly.
That one shouldnt change a functioning machine is absolute nonsense because with such a complex program you might have a problem without knowing it. Would that logically mean that you dont have that problem? Of course a new update could cause new peoblems that even you now could discover. But it's still nonsense to pretend that formerly you didnt have that problem because you had it but didnt even know it.
It's a legendary truth that software must contain certain unreported features for the real experts to discover on their own. And that principle is continued with the update practice. Of course it were possible to publish the 412 little new entries and the experienced user then could decide if he needed these details or not. But a real expert must also know that the description of some sub-points had to be longer, so that the trouble to read and decrypt the meaning and then to decide the steps could be more time consuming than the simple install routine for a new update.
