[CCB] Division 1,Edition 9
Moderator: Ras
-
Ovyron
- Posts: 4562
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:30 am
Re: [CCB] Division 1,Edition 9
Well, I think that trying to guess the first 3 places would have been interesting 
-
Rubinus
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:05 pm
- Location: Prague
- Full name: Pavel Háse
Re: [CCB] Division 1,Edition 9
Boot, E.T., Ruffian
-
GenoM
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:46 pm
- Location: Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Full name: Evgenii Manev
-
beachknight
- Posts: 3533
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:33 pm
- Location: Antalya, Turkey
-
beachknight
- Posts: 3533
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:33 pm
- Location: Antalya, Turkey
Re: [CCB] Division 1,Edition 9
I'd think that the most difficult to predict are
mid-range engines, ie 789 or 8910.
Best,
mid-range engines, ie 789 or 8910.
Best,
hi, merhaba, hallo HT
-
swami
- Posts: 6664
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
-
pedrox
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 6:07 am
- Location: Basque Country (Spain)
Re: [CCB] Division 1,Edition 9
It is strange that Rybka not lose time on slow systems and make it into systems faster.
Something similar happened to me when buying a new computer, I began to have more games lost in time, I thought even if the computer could be wrong.
Swami, I believe that in your tournament now play some programs (mp) with 4 processors and others 1. Such the possibility of playing with ponder = on for all engines and 2 processors for those who can?
With ponder is perhaps more possible problems?
Something similar happened to me when buying a new computer, I began to have more games lost in time, I thought even if the computer could be wrong.
Swami, I believe that in your tournament now play some programs (mp) with 4 processors and others 1. Such the possibility of playing with ponder = on for all engines and 2 processors for those who can?
With ponder is perhaps more possible problems?
Last edited by pedrox on Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Tony Thomas
Re: [CCB] Division 1,Edition 9
I was going to say that something is wrong with Rybka beta then i noticed your message. I didnt mean to miss the prediction tournament, I was just too lazy to do anything.
-
swami
- Posts: 6664
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Re: [CCB] Division 1,Edition 9
Hi Pedro,pedrox wrote:It is strange that Rybka not lose time on slow systems and make it into systems faster. I think that could happen with danasah me otherwise.
Swami, I believe that in your tournament now play some programs (mp) with 4 processors and others 1. Such the possibility of playing with ponder = on for all engines and 2 processors for those who can?
I think Bright and ETChess was using more processors as well, other engines are just working well, except Rybka beta. How do i configure the engine to use 2, 4 processors etc?
I have seen the games also, I couldn't do anything other than just let it go. Engines don't use ponder on, I will see what happens in the rest of the division also.
