Moderator: Ras
They are NOT too high, but to bad that we never had a chance to see Kasparov against this version of Rybka, so we can actually see the best human player being destroyed by a PC version of Chess, Not to mention without using a Super Computer like Deeper BlueGraham Banks wrote:Thanks to the SSDF testers and yourself Thoralf.
The ratings of the top two engines are pretty close to CCRL. Now wait for people to complain that they're too high!
What?????Ovyron wrote:If Kasparov were available at this time he would have to face 40cores Rybka.
If kasparov could't beat Junior 8 or Fritz 8 years ago , How do you think that it could face Rybka 40Cores?
...and even so I have serious doubts if kasparov could win a single game 
Shhh - you'll upset Terry!ArmyBridge wrote:What?????Ovyron wrote:If Kasparov were available at this time he would have to face 40cores Rybka.
Would be harder enough to Mr. Kasparov to face Rybka 3 in only 2cpu
Regards
Fear not.. What if Galileo hadnt held on to his view that Earth revolved around the sun? What if they still taught that earth is flat due to some unknown fear??Graham Banks wrote:Shhh - you'll upset Terry!ArmyBridge wrote:What?????Ovyron wrote:If Kasparov were available at this time he would have to face 40cores Rybka.
Would be harder enough to Mr. Kasparov to face Rybka 3 in only 2cpu
Regards
Yes but they built Cluster Rybka so they'll use it against upcoming grandmasters. Their dream is to beat someone with knight odds or something.ArmyBridge wrote:Would be harder enough to Mr. Kasparov to face Rybka 3 in only 2cpu
Yes, that's the idea.Tony Thomas wrote:Any plans for testing Naum?
