On my machine it is 3% faster for bench, and I am comparing it to an Intel build which usually clobbers my build (by anywhere from 10-30%).
C:\chess\winboard\crafty>crafty-22.9
EPD Kit revision date: 1996.04.21
found computer opening book file [./bookc.bin].
Initializing multiple threads.
System is SMP, not NUMA.
hash table memory = 192M bytes.
pawn hash table memory = 8M bytes.
EGTB cache memory = 32M bytes.
ERROR "drawscore=0 " is unknown rc-file option
choose from book moves randomly (using weights.)
choose from 5 best moves.
book learning enabled
result learning enabled
resign after 5 consecutive moves with score < -9.
EGTB access enabled
using tbpath=c:\chess\winboard\Nalimov;c:\arena\engines\nalimov;
6 piece tablebase files found
72095kb of RAM used for TB indices and decompression tables
max threads set to 4
Crafty v22.9 (4 cpus)
White(1): bench
Running benchmark. . .
......
Total nodes: 132210433
Raw nodes per second: 12019130
Total elapsed time: 11.82
White(1): quit
C:\chess\winboard\crafty>crafty-22.8-win64.exe
EPD Kit revision date: 1996.04.21
found computer opening book file [./bookc.bin].
Initializing multiple threads.
System is SMP, not NUMA.
hash table memory = 192M bytes.
pawn hash table memory = 8M bytes.
EGTB cache memory = 32M bytes.
ERROR "drawscore=0 " is unknown rc-file option
choose from book moves randomly (using weights.)
choose from 5 best moves.
book learning enabled
result learning enabled
resign after 5 consecutive moves with score < -9.
EGTB access enabled
using tbpath=c:\chess\winboard\Nalimov;c:\arena\engines\nalimov;
6 piece tablebase files found
72127kb of RAM used for TB indices and decompression tables
max threads set to 4
Crafty v22.8 (4 cpus)
White(1): bench
Running benchmark. . .
......
Total nodes: 128172256
Raw nodes per second: 11652023
Total elapsed time: 11.45
White(1):
Dann Corbit wrote:On my machine it is 3% faster for bench, and I am comparing it to an Intel build which usually clobbers my build (by anywhere from 10-30%).
Interesting. I used the same compiler version and the same compiler options for both 22.8 and 22.9: