Why is FireBird 1.1 WD doing no better than Fire 1.31 ?Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Very pleased with the result of FireBird 1.1 WD![]()

Moderator: Ras
Why is FireBird 1.1 WD doing no better than Fire 1.31 ?Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Very pleased with the result of FireBird 1.1 WD![]()
I don't know....in my rating list it's far stronger than Fire 1.31....ernest wrote:Why is FireBird 1.1 WD doing no better than Fire 1.31 ?Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Very pleased with the result of FireBird 1.1 WD![]()
Because it will climb hgher with more games,that's whyernest wrote:Then why are you pleased?...
Code: Select all
59.226 SWCR games
Last update: October 14th, 2010 (16:30)
At the moment IvanHoe T0.4 x64 and IvanHoe 52iUSTMO x64
are still running for SWCR-64!
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 Houdini 1.03a x64 2947 22 21 920 79% 2717 29%
2 Rybka 4 x64 2937 17 16 1586 79% 2707 31%
3 IvanHoe T0.4 x64 2925 36 34 300 76% 2735 38%
4 IvanHoe B52aC x64 2920 21 20 920 76% 2734 36%
5 IvanHoe 52iUSTMO x64 2907 35 34 300 74% 2736 37%
6 Rybka 3 x64 2904 23 22 840 78% 2686 28%
7 Stockfish 1.8.0 JA x64 2903 18 17 1266 73% 2724 34%
8 Fire 1.31 x64 2900 21 20 920 75% 2720 36%
9 FireBird 1.1 x64 WD 2897 20 19 920 73% 2735 41%
10 Stockfish 1.7.1 JA x64 2895 19 19 1120 76% 2705 34%
11 Rybka 4 2895 20 20 960 76% 2703 32%
12 Stockfish 1.7.1 JA 2875 18 18 1200 75% 2690 31%
13 Stockfish 1.8.0 JA 2863 20 20 920 74% 2697 37%
14 Rybka 3 2860 16 16 1520 74% 2689 31%
15 Critter 0.80 x64 2834 17 17 1266 65% 2726 36%
16 Naum 4.2 x64 2831 14 14 1826 66% 2714 36%
17 Stockfish 1.6.3 JA 2827 18 18 1080 71% 2680 36%
18 Naum 4.2 2824 16 16 1440 68% 2701 36%
19 Critter 0.80 2814 21 20 800 66% 2703 39%
20 Naum 4.1 2811 20 19 920 68% 2686 35%
21 Critter 0.70 x64 2805 20 19 880 65% 2700 38%
22 Stockfish 1.6.0 JA 2802 19 19 960 68% 2687 39%
23 Shredder 12 2800 10 10 3786 63% 2707 37%
24 Komodo 1.2 JA x64 2799 15 15 1586 62% 2711 40%
25 Komodo 1.0 JA x64 2789 20 20 840 64% 2691 40%
26 Shredder 12 x64 2786 15 15 1600 63% 2689 34%
Looks like your setting for Firebird is doing ok. Nice going.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Thanks Frank for being a real man to test the IPPo family engines![]()
Watching with big interest regards,
Dr.D
Thanks Geroldgerold wrote:Looks like your setting for Firebird is doing ok. Nice going.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Thanks Frank for being a real man to test the IPPo family engines![]()
Watching with big interest regards,
Dr.D
Best,
Gerold.
Hi Frank,Frank Quisinsky wrote:Hi Wael,
no, no ...
Test ended with 920 games.
IPP family engine will be deleted after the test, mean 5 of 6. Only one of this engines I used for SWCR-64. This engine will be play more games. The results from the other 5 are available as extra download in my download area.
Best of the IvanHoe seria will play with time more games.
Most interesting (playing style) is version B52aC.
It seems that T0.4 is a little bit stronger.
Not sure, which of this two engines, I think B52aC (playing style is more important for me).
Best
Frank