Fusion Reaction

[Kempelen]

very tight at top, nice win for Dirty.

Thanks Graham.

[Graham Banks]

Thanks Andres and Fermin.

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi,

hm, I am reading it too.
The next must have ... Dirty!
So many interesting engines, more and more I am thinking to add more of this engines in SWCR. An order for the next year, at first the oldies with the next big SWCR tourney.

Dirty different others are in my brain.
I have to download the engine and will give my thanks to the programmers for all this great works.

Graham, why you test all this engines and add so many messages about it. This is bad for myself because I must read it

Have a nice weekend!

Best
Frank

CCRL and CEGT don't have an own ponder = on list. SWCR is an old name (SCHACHWELT computer ratings). But I don't work for this magazine a long time. I like the statistics the admin from CCRL create, perhaps the best available. I am open for a cooperation, fusion. I think this give me more fun as to do it alone. If no list from the others have interest to cooperate with my work, OK I can make it in own work for the next 100 years. Better is to find partners.

[Graham Banks]

Hi,

hm, I am reading it too.
The next must have ... Dirty!
So many interesting engines, more and more I am thinking to add more of this engines in SWCR. An order for the next year, at first the oldies with the next big SWCR tourney.

Dirty different others are in my brain.
I have to download the engine and will give my thanks to the programmers for all this great works.

Graham, why you test all this engines and add so many messages about it. This is bad for myself because I must read it

Have a nice weekend!

Best
Frank

CCRL and CEGT don't have an own ponder = on list. SWCR is an old name (SCHACHWELT computer ratings). But I don't work for this magazine a long time. I like the statistics the admin from CCRL create, perhaps the best available. I am open for a cooperation, fusion. I think this give me more fun as to do it alone. If no list from the others have interest to cooperate with my work, OK I can make it in own work for the next 100 years. Better is to find partners.

Hi Frank,

I've alerted the other CCRL members to your comments so that they can discuss them. Will get back to you in private.
Hope your weekend goes well too.

Cheers,
Graham.

[Andres Valverde]

very tight at top, nice win for Dirty.

Thanks Graham.

Thanks Fermin, your FSTM was helpful

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi Graham,

Weather could be better and I need a bit ease. Yes discuss with the CCRL team members about it. It would be better to collect more people which have interest to working on such information we do it.

In the time I am starting with SWCR it was a little project only. Need an own work for my reports for the chess magazine SCHACHWELT. Never in the past I used information by others for such things. In the time my work ended (changeover from printed issue to internet news page only, not in my interest) it was a shame to stop the SWCR. So I reactivated my older webpage. In times today I feel like to work on SWCR or I lost a bit my interest. It's not easy to hold with such a work a longer time the own motivation. On the other hand the machines can run, nothing to do with my motivation! At the moment my motivation is on level 7 of 10

I try to make my list better with different little changes. In my interest is to test more engines, give me more motivation as to see each time the same engines.

I am sure it is not easy to find consensual solutions for a fusion. On the other hand the SWCR can run under an other flag as own ponder = on list. Why not, must be organize a bit.

Yes, let us discuss in private mails if the CCRL team like this idea. I am open for such a discuss, thinking its better to collect such things as to powered individual things. The main problem computer chess have in general. Unfortunately, and I again in frontline (never, never in my own interest).

Best
Frank