ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

IWB
Posts: 1539
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by IWB »

If you want to draw religious conclusions it is more like the third confession, the Calvinism.

And this is more a describtion what is happening right now:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnster_Rebellion

The article in the german wikipedia is better as it has much more details:

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C3%A4ufe ... C3%BCnster

I urge everyone who can to read the german article, some parallels* are eye-catching!

*"Some"!, do not stretch the picture too far, please :-)

Bye
Ingo
User avatar
Harvey Williamson
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:12 pm
Location: Whitchurch. Shropshire, UK.
Full name: Harvey Williamson

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by Harvey Williamson »

User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by geots »

SzG wrote:
geots wrote:
Junk put on top of garbage.
Please omit the whole long quotation so we can find the single line you contributed.

I don't quite get what you mean. I thought it explained itself- tho I admit I am not known for brevity.

Anyway, ICGA is garbage and the report is the junk thrown on top.

(Think like a green bean casserole with onion bits on top)

Anyway- what is with the kns per second of Alfil 11 and 12? I don't believe they hide the true count- doesn't it have to be too slow to ever compete.

george
Last edited by geots on Sun Jan 08, 2012 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Steve B
Posts: 3697
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:26 pm

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by Steve B »

Has Rajlich even responded to any of this on any of the forums?
Rather then let the Rybka Party Faithful(Moderators,friends,,Aunts and Uncles ..long term posters,,etcetc) speak for him.. you would think by now..certainly now that Playchess has taken up the issue..he would speak out and try to defend himself or dispute the ICGA decision
if not..IMHO his total silence on the forums speaks volumes
either he cant defend himself or he simply could care less
im guessing its probably both
i cant imagine any other programmer remaining silent for so long..
im sorry it's way past due that he himself speak out
Muted Regards
Steve
IGarcia
Posts: 543
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:27 pm

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by IGarcia »

AdminX wrote:
Mike S. wrote:We are witnessing nothing less than the schism of computer chess. :shock: The process is irreversible already.

From now on, we are divided into the "anti Rybka / pro ICGA" persuasion and in the "pro Rybka / anti ICGA" persuasion (in addition to the third group which doesn't care for either, and I suspect that is the biggest :mrgreen: ).

Image
not Dr Søren Riis
Maybe we should create a sub forum for personal attacks, in fighting, or whatever you want to call it as these hot topics always seem to go this way. Oh and yes this Sub forum should be Hidden and for members only! :D
How can any support someone taking Gnu code, change a bit and sell it?
Is not about "rybka / anti rybka", is about honest / dishonest

IGCA has rules. Someone break the rules, get punished. Thats is a good principle.
Much better than the principles of rybka ..."author"? rybka.."programmer"?
User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 7604
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Full name: Ed Schröder

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by Rebel »

Steve B wrote:Has Rajlich even responded to any of this on any of the forums?
Rather then let the Rybka Party Faithful(Moderators,friends,,Aunts and Uncles ..long term posters,,etcetc) speak for him.. you would think by now..certainly now that Playchess has taken up the issue..he would speak out and try to defend himself or dispute the ICGA decision
if not..IMHO his total silence on the forums speaks volumes
either he cant defend himself or he simply could care less
im guessing its probably both
i cant imagine any other programmer remaining silent for so long..
im sorry it's way past due that he himself speak out
Muted Regards
Steve
Steve,

The big question is, provided Vas will speak right now, would that be of any help? Or will he be teared down into pieces ?

Bottom line, will he receive a listening ear ?

There has been a 5-6 year anti-Rybka campaign especially here at this forum and that has left its traces in the minds of many.
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by geots »

geots wrote:
SzG wrote:
geots wrote:
Junk put on top of garbage.
Please omit the whole long quotation so we can find the single line you contributed.

I don't quite get what you mean. I thought it explained itself- tho I admit I am not known for brevity.

Anyway, ICGA is garbage and the report is the junk thrown on top.

(Think like a green bean casserole with onion bits on top)

Anyway- what is with the kns per second of Alfil 11 and 12? I don't believe they hide the true count- doesn't it have to be too slow to ever compete.

george


Never mind about Alfil. It was all a matter of semantics- it WAS using the max- or COULD use the max.
User avatar
sje
Posts: 4675
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 7:43 pm

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by sje »

Steve B wrote:Has Rajlich even responded to any of this on any of the forums?
Rather then let the Rybka Party Faithful(Moderators,friends,,Aunts and Uncles ..long term posters,,etcetc) speak for him.. you would think by now..certainly now that Playchess has taken up the issue..he would speak out and try to defend himself or dispute the ICGA decision
if not..IMHO his total silence on the forums speaks volumes
either he cant defend himself or he simply could care less
im guessing its probably both
The above also is my take on this situation.

The ICGA gave Rajlich ample opportunity to present a defense, but none from him was forthcoming. Instead, the honest investigators are plagued by harpy-like, ad hominem attacks -- the most vociferous of which come from the least technically qualified.

Even at this very late date, I believe that if Rajlich were to admit to obvious and unauthorized copying, then he could get his lifetime ICGA ban lessened to a few years at most. But a continued stubbornness accompanied by a failure to disavow his cacophonous public defenders means that the ICGA ban will follow him to his grave.
User avatar
Harvey Williamson
Posts: 2030
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:12 pm
Location: Whitchurch. Shropshire, UK.
Full name: Harvey Williamson

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by Harvey Williamson »

sje wrote:Even at this very late date, I believe that if Rajlich were to admit to obvious and unauthorized copying, then he could get his lifetime ICGA ban lessened to a few years at most. But a continued stubbornness accompanied by a failure to disavow his cacophonous public defenders means that the ICGA ban will follow him to his grave.
I agree.
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by gerold »

Steve B wrote:Has Rajlich even responded to any of this on any of the forums?
Rather then let the Rybka Party Faithful(Moderators,friends,,Aunts and Uncles ..long term posters,,etcetc) speak for him.. you would think by now..certainly now that Playchess has taken up the issue..he would speak out and try to defend himself or dispute the ICGA decision
if not..IMHO his total silence on the forums speaks volumes
either he cant defend himself or he simply could care less
im guessing its probably both
i cant imagine any other programmer remaining silent for so long..
im sorry it's way past due that he himself speak out
Muted Regards
Steve
As long as there is no court case his program is legal to sell.
Chess Base and Vas will sell the program as long as it makes money.
That's the bottom line.

Best,
Gerold.