Texel, SF, Elektro, Fire & Mars at 300"+3" tnt

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

majortom
Posts: 669
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm

Re: Texel, SF, Elektro, Fire & Mars at 300"+3"

Post by majortom »

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER           : RATING  ERROR   POINTS  PLAYED    (%)
   1 Mars 3.31 x64    :   92.6   45.2     75.5     120   62.9%
   2 Elektro 1.1b     :    0.0   ----     44.5     120   37.1%
majortom
Posts: 669
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm

Re: Texel, SF, Elektro, Fire & Mars at 300"+3"

Post by majortom »

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                         : RATING  ERROR   POINTS  PLAYED    (%)

   1 Stockfish 151014 64 SSE4.2     :  333.9   35.4    382.5     480   79.7%
   2 Mars 3.31 x64                  :  164.1   31.1    262.5     480   54.7%
   3 Fire 2.2 xTreme NS 2014 x64    :   99.4   31.8    212.0     480   44.2%
   4 Elektro 1.1b                   :   91.1   31.8    205.5     480   42.8%
   5 Texel 1.05a7 64-bit            :    0.0   ----    137.5     480   28.6%
majortom
Posts: 669
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm

Re: Texel, SF, Elektro, Fire & Mars at 300"+3"

Post by majortom »

Code: Select all

    Program                          Elo    +   -   Games   Score   Av.Op.  Draws

  1 Stockfish 151014 64 SSE4.2     : 3187   26  26   480    79.7 %   2949   35.6 %
  2 Mars 3.31 x64                  : 3023   21  21   480    54.7 %   2990   53.1 %
  3 Fire 2.2 xTreme NS 2014 x64    : 2964   21  21   480    44.2 %   3005   53.3 %
  4 Elektro 1.1b                   : 2956   22  22   480    42.8 %   3007   48.5 %
  5 Texel 1.05a7 64-bit            : 2870   25  26   480    28.6 %   3028   36.9 %

Code: Select all

Individual statistics:

1 Stockfish 151014 64 SSE4.2: 3187  480 (+297,=171,- 12), 79.7 %

Fire 2.2 xTreme NS 2014 x64   : 120 (+ 72,= 46,-  2), 79.2 %
Texel 1.05a7 64-bit           : 120 (+ 87,= 30,-  3), 85.0 %
Mars 3.31 x64                 : 120 (+ 61,= 57,-  2), 74.6 %
Elektro 1.1b                  : 120 (+ 77,= 38,-  5), 80.0 %

2 Mars 3.31 x64             : 3023  480 (+135,=255,- 90), 54.7 %

Fire 2.2 xTreme NS 2014 x64   : 120 (+ 28,= 80,- 12), 56.7 %
Stockfish 151014 64 SSE4.2    : 120 (+  2,= 57,- 61), 25.4 %
Texel 1.05a7 64-bit           : 120 (+ 66,= 45,-  9), 73.8 %
Elektro 1.1b                  : 120 (+ 39,= 73,-  8), 62.9 %

3 Fire 2.2 xTreme NS 2014 x64: 2964  480 (+ 84,=256,-140), 44.2 %

Stockfish 151014 64 SSE4.2    : 120 (+  2,= 46,- 72), 20.8 %
Texel 1.05a7 64-bit           : 120 (+ 49,= 55,- 16), 63.7 %
Mars 3.31 x64                 : 120 (+ 12,= 80,- 28), 43.3 %
Elektro 1.1b                  : 120 (+ 21,= 75,- 24), 48.8 %

4 Elektro 1.1b              : 2956  480 (+ 89,=233,-158), 42.8 %

Fire 2.2 xTreme NS 2014 x64   : 120 (+ 24,= 75,- 21), 51.2 %
Stockfish 151014 64 SSE4.2    : 120 (+  5,= 38,- 77), 20.0 %
Texel 1.05a7 64-bit           : 120 (+ 52,= 47,- 21), 62.9 %
Mars 3.31 x64                 : 120 (+  8,= 73,- 39), 37.1 %

5 Texel 1.05a7 64-bit       : 2870  480 (+ 49,=177,-254), 28.6 %

Fire 2.2 xTreme NS 2014 x64   : 120 (+ 16,= 55,- 49), 36.2 %
Stockfish 151014 64 SSE4.2    : 120 (+  3,= 30,- 87), 15.0 %
Mars 3.31 x64                 : 120 (+  9,= 45,- 66), 26.2 %
Elektro 1.1b                  : 120 (+ 21,= 47,- 52), 37.1 %
majortom
Posts: 669
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm

Re: Texel, SF, Elektro, Fire & Mars at 300"+3"

Post by majortom »

Fire 2.2 xTreme NS 2014 x64 - direct predecessor of Mars 3.31 compiled with Intel's PGO by myself.
majortom
Posts: 669
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm

Re: Texel, SF, Elektro, Fire & Mars at 300"+3"

Post by majortom »

Texel 1.05a7 64-bit is a very strong engine, only 90 elo behind the Ippos.

[pgn][Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2014.10.19"]
[Round "5"]
[White "Texel 1.05a7 64-bit"]
[Black "Stockfish 151014 64 SSE4.2"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "Chess"]
[Opening "960 Position 518"]
[TimeControl "300+3"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "145"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]

1. d4 {book} Nf6 {book} 2. c4 {book} e6 {book} 3. Nc3 {book} Bb4 {book} 4.
Nf3 {book} d6 {book} 5. Bd2 {+0.12/17 13s} O-O {-0.18/22 8.6s} 6. e3
{+0.04/17 16s} b6 {-0.18/23 9.1s} 7. Bd3 {+0.08/18 12s} Bb7 {-0.13/23 13s}
8. O-O {+0.11/18 12s} Bxc3 {-0.20/23 26s} 9. Bxc3 {+0.30/19 12s} Ne4
{-0.21/23 5.8s} 10. Be1 {+0.28/18 11s} c5 {-0.21/23 9.2s} 11. b4 {+0.22/16
23s} f5 {-0.10/20 13s} 12. Qc2 {+0.37/15 11s} Nd7 {-0.13/21 9.7s} 13. a4
{+0.43/16 10s} Ng5 {-0.21/22 23s} 14. Nxg5 {+0.52/18 10s} Qxg5 {-0.21/22
5.7s} 15. f4 {+0.55/18 10.0s} Qh6 {-0.15/22 26s} 16. bxc5 {+0.44/15 16s}
bxc5 {-0.18/21 14s} 17. Rb1 {+0.51/16 16s} Rab8 {-0.43/22 13s} 18. Ba5
{+1.22/18 9.0s} Rfc8 {-0.76/24 44s} 19. d5 {+1.67/18 8.8s} Nf6 {-0.75/23
7.2s} 20. h3 {+1.74/18 8.6s} g6 {-0.83/24 6.3s} 21. dxe6 {+1.20/17 9.3s}
Qf8 {-0.91/22 9.4s} 22. Bc3 {+1.25/17 11s} Bc6 {-1.31/26 23s} 23. Bxf5
{+1.57/17 8.2s} Rxb1 {-0.80/28 9.0s} 24. Qxb1 {+1.65/20 11s} gxf5 {-1.37/28
19s} 25. Qxf5 {+1.56/20 7.7s} Qg7 {-1.31/29 4.1s} 26. Rf2 {+1.55/20 7.5s}
Rf8 {-0.79/21 6.0s} 27. Qd3 {+1.52/19 7.4s} Qe7 {-1.04/23 17s} 28. Bxf6
{+1.70/18 7.4s} Rxf6 {-1.24/22 6.7s} 29. f5 {+1.75/20 7.1s} Rf8 {-1.20/23
12s} 30. e4 {+2.57/19 7.0s} h6 {-1.45/24 8.5s} 31. a5 {+2.69/18 6.9s} Kh8
{-1.32/20 5.7s} 32. Rd2 {+3.17/19 6.8s} Qf6 {-1.50/21 4.6s} 33. Qe3
{+2.70/16 10s} Rb8 {-1.55/22 6.4s} 34. Qf4 {+3.82/16 6.5s} Qg5 {-1.77/26
6.6s} 35. Qxg5 {+3.63/18 6.4s} hxg5 {-2.54/27 12s} 36. f6 {+3.36/20 6.3s}
Bxe4 {-2.67/26 11s} 37. Rxd6 {+2.96/21 6.2s} Kh7 {-2.67/26 2.6s} 38. Rd2
{+3.05/21 6.2s} Rh8 {-2.13/23 6.1s} 39. a6 {+3.84/20 7.4s} Kh6 {-2.89/25
9.0s} 40. Kh2 {+3.51/20 6.0s} Kg6 {-3.25/26 6.0s} 41. Rf2 {+4.54/24 5.8s}
Bc6 {-4.01/28 3.6s} 42. f7 {+5.15/25 5.7s} Rf8 {-4.81/24 3.0s} 43. Kg3
{+5.72/25 5.6s} Ba4 {-4.94/24 2.6s} 44. Rf1 {+6.12/24 5.5s} Bc6 {-5.11/25
3.4s} 45. Kg4 {+6.46/23 5.5s} Bxg2 {-5.25/24 2.2s} 46. e7 {+6.68/21 6.1s}
Rxf7 {-5.25/24 1.9s} 47. e8=Q {+6.83/20 5.3s} Bxf1 {-5.31/25 2.0s} 48. Qg8+
{+7.09/19 5.2s} Kf6 {-5.50/26 5.6s} 49. Qxg5+ {+7.26/19 5.2s} Ke6 {-5.50/1
0.001s} 50. Qxc5 {+7.65/17 7.6s} Bg2 {-5.88/22 5.9s} 51. h4 {+7.80/16 5.0s}
Bf3+ {-6.05/18 3.4s} 52. Kg5 {+8.79/17 5.4s} Be4 {-6.77/18 3.0s} 53. Qc8+
{+9.02/17 4.8s} Ke7 {-6.81/20 3.0s} 54. c5 {+10.69/17 4.8s} Rg7+ {-8.91/18
3.0s} 55. Kf4 {+10.22/16 4.7s} Bg2 {-10.54/20 3.0s} 56. h5 {+12.43/17 4.7s}
Rf7+ {-10.25/19 3.0s} 57. Ke5 {+13.41/17 4.6s} Rf2 {-11.46/20 2.5s} 58.
Qc7+ {+13.54/15 4.6s} Kf8 {-13.71/20 3.2s} 59. h6 {+15.15/15 4.6s} Re2+
{-20.69/16 2.4s} 60. Kf6 {+15.20/16 4.5s} Rf2+ {-M30/27 2.6s} 61. Kg5
{+16.11/16 4.5s} Rf1 {-M26/31 4.3s} 62. c6 {+17.43/14 9.1s} Bxc6 {-M22/25
2.7s} 63. Qxc6 {+26.32/15 4.5s} Rf7 {-M16/29 3.3s} 64. Qa8+ {+M23/13 4.2s}
Ke7 {-M18/1 0s} 65. Qxa7+ {+M17/12 4.5s} Ke6 {-M16/38 3.0s} 66. Qxf7+
{+M15/12 5.0s} Kxf7 {-M14/50 2.1s} 67. a7 {+M13/14 1.1s} Ke6 {-M12/66 2.2s}
68. a8=Q {+M11/12 0.34s} Ke5 {-M10/93 2.2s} 69. h7 {+M9/10 0.16s} Kd4
{-M8/120 0.50s} 70. h8=Q+ {+M7/8 0.016s} Kc4 {-M6/120 0.080s} 71. Qc6+
{+M5/6 0.018s} Kb3 {-M4/120 0.005s} 72. Qcc3+ {+M3/4 0.004s} Ka2 {-M2/120
0.005s} 73. Qb2# {+M1/2 0.001s, White mates} 1-0
[/pgn]
majortom
Posts: 669
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm

Re: Texel, SF, Elektro, Fire & Mars at 300"+3"

Post by majortom »

Elektro is much stronger than at the fast TC.
He has almost the same strength as Fire 2.2.
majortom
Posts: 669
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm

Re: Texel, SF, Elektro, Fire & Mars at 300"+3"

Post by majortom »

The shortest game:

[pgn][Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2014.10.19"]
[Round "118"]
[White "Stockfish 151014 64 SSE4.2"]
[Black "Elektro 1.1b"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "Chess"]
[Opening "960 Position 518"]
[TimeControl "300+3"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "49"]
[WhiteType "human"]
[BlackType "human"]

1. d4 {book} Nf6 {book} 2. Bg5 {book} e6 {book} 3. e3 {book} b6 {book} 4.
Nf3 {book} Bb7 {book} 5. Bd3 {book} h6 {-0.02/19 16s} 6. Bxf6 {+0.24/22
9.0s} Qxf6 {+0.06/19 11s} 7. c3 {+0.18/22 9.0s} Nc6 {+0.15/19 14s} 8. O-O
{+0.14/20 15s} g5 {+0.14/18 7.4s} 9. Nfd2 {+0.01/21 34s} h5 {+0.21/18 31s}
10. a4 {+0.04/20 11s} g4 {+0.27/17 2.6s} 11. Na3 {-0.03/20 19s} Bg7
{+0.20/16 2.1s} 12. Nb5 {+0.28/19 9.3s} O-O-O {0.00/18 18s} 13. a5
{+1.53/19 15s} a6 {0.00/18 3.5s} 14. Nd6+ {+1.38/22 14s} cxd6 {+0.09/15
2.2s} 15. axb6 {+1.70/22 5.5s} a5 {-0.28/17 42s} 16. b4 {+2.80/19 8.1s}
axb4 {-0.84/15 12s} 17. Ne4 {+5.64/23 16s} Qe7 {-2.99/15 19s} 18. Qa4
{+5.77/24 5.5s} Nb8 {-3.95/15 42s} 19. cxb4 {+12.01/24 9.3s} g3 {-2.99/13
0s} 20. Rfc1+ {+M11/55 7.9s} Nc6 {-M10/15 4.0s} 21. Ba6 {+M9/75 5.6s} gxh2+
{-M8/22 5.8s} 22. Kh1 {+M7/120 0.84s} Kb8 {-M6/23 8.0s} 23. Bxb7 {+M5/120
0.070s} Na5 {-M4/22 8.1s} 24. Qxa5 {+M3/120 0.011s} Kxb7 {-M2/22 8.8s} 25.
Qa7# {+M1/120 0.007s, White mates} 1-0
[/pgn]
majortom
Posts: 669
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:19 pm

Re: Texel, SF, Elektro, Fire & Mars at 300"+3"

Post by majortom »

User avatar
Ozymandias
Posts: 1537
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 2:30 am

Re: Texel, SF, Elektro, Fire & Mars at 300"+3"

Post by Ozymandias »

majortom wrote:Elektro is much stronger than at the fast TC.
He has almost the same strength as Fire 2.2.
I was expecting that much. Wasn't sure about Mars keeping #1, at a slower TC. Thx for the games.