Komodo better at very LTC is over I think.Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:You are not going to hear, you will see it.JJJ wrote:Come on. I m hoping for Komodo to be better than stockfish soon and get the realease when it ll come. But still not to soon I hope.
So I don't want to hear that Komodo will loose this one![]()
Btw., all tests are interesting and providing us with useful information.
For example, what is it that makes Komodo perform worse than SF in bullet, than at equal strength in blitz, then again worse at rapid, and then finally better at very long time control?
Not a linear trend, in any case.
KOMODO 1405 x64 6CPU v STOCKFISH 210315 x64 6CPU (Match)
Moderator: Ras
-
JJJ
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:47 pm
Re: KOMODO 1405 x64 6CPU v STOCKFISH 210315 x64 6CPU (Match)
-
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
- Posts: 6052
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: KOMODO 1405 x64 6CPU v STOCKFISH 210315 x64 6CPU (Match)
Not quite sure.JJJ wrote:Komodo better at very LTC is over I think.Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:You are not going to hear, you will see it.JJJ wrote:Come on. I m hoping for Komodo to be better than stockfish soon and get the realease when it ll come. But still not to soon I hope.
So I don't want to hear that Komodo will loose this one![]()
Btw., all tests are interesting and providing us with useful information.
For example, what is it that makes Komodo perform worse than SF in bullet, than at equal strength in blitz, then again worse at rapid, and then finally better at very long time control?
Not a linear trend, in any case.
The last 2 matches run by Graham were AMD matches, where for some reason, at least on multiple cores, Komodo seems to perform worse in relation to SF.
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 45330
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: KOMODO 1405 x64 6CPU v STOCKFISH 210315 x64 6CPU (Match)
Not so sure that this is fact. More of a rumour or assumption, I suspect.Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:....AMD matches, where for some reason, at least on multiple cores, Komodo seems to perform worse in relation to SF.
Anyway, might run a match on my Intel octal at some stage.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
- Posts: 6052
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: KOMODO 1405 x64 6CPU v STOCKFISH 210315 x64 6CPU (Match)
Most of the tests I have seen recently seem to indicate that.Graham Banks wrote:Not so sure that this is fact. More of a rumour or assumption, I suspect.Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:....AMD matches, where for some reason, at least on multiple cores, Komodo seems to perform worse in relation to SF.
Anyway, might run a match on my Intel octal at some stage.
For example, recently Bertil posted on fishcooking test data relating to latest SF SMP patches. According to the data, after more than a 1000 games, on 24 core AMD machines SF performs some 30-35 elo better than Komodo in comparison to the same sample size on Intel machines.
-
Modern Times
- Posts: 3807
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: KOMODO 1405 x64 6CPU v STOCKFISH 210315 x64 6CPU (Match)
Current Score:
Komodo leads 111.0 - 109.0 ( +33 = 156 -31)
Very close indeed !
Komodo leads 111.0 - 109.0 ( +33 = 156 -31)
Very close indeed !
-
JJJ
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:47 pm
Re: KOMODO 1405 x64 6CPU v STOCKFISH 210315 x64 6CPU (Match)
Haha ! What will you say now Lyudmil Tsvetkov ? 
-
Modern Times
- Posts: 3807
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: KOMODO 1405 x64 6CPU v STOCKFISH 210315 x64 6CPU (Match)
Stockfish leads 136.0 - 132.0 ( +42 =188 -38)
-
JJJ
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:47 pm
Re: KOMODO 1405 x64 6CPU v STOCKFISH 210315 x64 6CPU (Match)
What will you say now Jean-Baptiste ? 
-
Modern Times
- Posts: 3807
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: KOMODO 1405 x64 6CPU v STOCKFISH 210315 x64 6CPU (Match)
With such a narrow margin, you were setting yourself up there !
Long way to go yet, just over half way through.
Long way to go yet, just over half way through.
-
JJJ
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:47 pm
Re: KOMODO 1405 x64 6CPU v STOCKFISH 210315 x64 6CPU (Match)
I knowModern Times wrote:With such a narrow margin, you were setting yourself up there !