brianr wrote: ↑Tue Dec 29, 2020 1:06 pm
The point is that on both CCC and TCEC the fast GPUs are being vastly underutilized by the extremely slow MHz CPUs.
I am not sure if it works the same with the Epyc CPUs, but if you are using Threadripper CPUS and only use a few, they run at a much higher clock rate.
The scheduler seems to know which CPUs are able to take the most clock rate.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
brianr wrote: ↑Tue Dec 29, 2020 1:33 pm
Look at the specs for the max extra clock speeds...they are very low for the CPUs with a huge number of cores.
Seems like the optimal LC0 server might have 8 cores at 7 or 8 GHz cooled with liquid nitrogen for the CPU part.
It would probably still cost less than what they are using.
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
Despite the big advantage for SF over LC0, I predict LC0 will leapfrog SF within a year or two due to the new AMD architecture.
The CPU and GPU will both have transparent, synchronized access to both the video RAM and the regular RAM, so all of the copy back and forth nonsense will be a thing of the past. The CPUs can read directly from the video RAM and the GPUs can read directly from the system RAM.
Do I hear angels singing?
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.
Why do they need to answer. Both have massive hardware. Will it change any results.
If you notice even on our much smaller hardware. The ranking of the engines does not really change.
And this is also what I am seeing in my testing.
Yes, I don't see the point in this huge hardware. As you say, the results are probably the same on 32 cores, and I'd guess none of the authors have tested their engines on this level of hardware. Better quality chess however you define that, maybe, but you also probably increase the draw rate as well. Which is when they have to move towards unbalanced openings as an artificial way to spice things up.
Dann Corbit wrote: ↑Tue Dec 29, 2020 1:43 pm
Despite the big advantage for SF over LC0, I predict LC0 will leapfrog SF within a year or two due to the new AMD architecture.
Yes interesting times ahead, Lc0 is not out for the count just yet.
Dann Corbit wrote: ↑Tue Dec 29, 2020 1:43 pm
Do I hear angels singing?
The angels were singing Alpha Zero four years ago.
The show went on the road and tickets were free.
And, now you want the angels to do a new show?
Ecclesiastes 5:10
Taking ideas is not a vice, it is a virtue. We have another word for this. It is called learning.
But sharing ideas is an even greater virtue. We have another word for this. It is called teaching.