Previous link was reported broken. Retrying:gaard wrote: ↑Wed Feb 24, 2021 6:46 am Final results:
LOS:Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%) 1 Stockfish 13 : 0.0 ---- 709.5 1248 56.9% 2 Fat Fritz 2 Private : -21.2 12.1 654.0 1248 52.4% 3 Fat Fritz 2 Public : -76.8 12.3 508.5 1248 40.7% White advantage = 30.38 Draw rate (equal opponents) = 72.08 %Games:Code: Select all
Stockfish 13 100.0 100.0 Fat Fritz 2 Private 0.0 100.0 Fat Fritz 2 Public 0.0 0.0
SF13 vs FF2: Representative opening suite
Moderator: Ras
-
gaard
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:13 am
- Location: Holland, MI
- Full name: Martin W
Re: SF13 vs FF2: Representative opening suite
-
dkappe
- Posts: 1632
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: SF13 vs FF2: Representative opening suite
I didn’t see a time control.
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
-
Modern Times
- Posts: 3806
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: SF13 vs FF2: Representative opening suite
From the pgn:
[TimeControl "60+1"]
[TimeControl "60+1"]
-
mar
- Posts: 2674
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:00 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
- Full name: Martin Sedlak
-
Krzysztof Grzelak
- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 12:47 pm
Re: SF13 vs FF2: Representative opening suite
In a word, the FF2 engine is a bit overrated.
-
gaard
- Posts: 463
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:13 am
- Location: Holland, MI
- Full name: Martin W
Re: SF13 vs FF2: Representative opening suite
At these time controls, it is no doubt inferior to SF13. At longer time controls I'm sure it's still rated below SF13, but probably not by as much.