Gambit Rating List - May 20, 2021

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
xr_a_y
Posts: 1872
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:28 pm
Location: France

Re: Gambit Rating List - May 20, 2021

Post by xr_a_y »

connor_mcmonigle wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 5:04 pm
xr_a_y wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 4:51 pm Ok thanks. For sure Nehalem build is far from the best for NNUE evaluation so if your hardware allows to use a better one please do.
For instance Seer has no nehalem build, so you used ivybridge or skylake one (the core2 one would be very very slow), so I deduce that the sandybridge build of Minic can probably be used on your hardware it seems ?

I'd love to try your opening suite at home, is it available somewhere please ?
The opening book might be relevant here, but I have Minic 3.07 at +33 elo in one of my tests to Seer v2.0.1 on a relatively high draw rate book. It seems a clear improvement to 3.04 which was maybe 40 elo behind Seer v2.0.1 under similar conditions.
More precisely
Minic 3.04 NoNo < Seer v2.0.1
Minic 3.06 NoNa ~ Seer v2.0.1
Minic 3.07 NaNo > Seer v2.0.1
connor_mcmonigle
Posts: 544
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:40 am
Full name: Connor McMonigle

Re: Gambit Rating List - May 20, 2021

Post by connor_mcmonigle »

xr_a_y wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 7:10 pm ...
More precisely
Minic 3.04 NoNo < Seer v2.0.1
Minic 3.06 NoNa ~ Seer v2.0.1
Minic 3.07 NaNo > Seer v2.0.1
Yep. I used the same network with each version number as listed above in my understanding. Your results are consistent with what I've observed in my testing. Now that you're embedding the networks, it should be easier to keep track of which network is associated with which release :)
User avatar
xr_a_y
Posts: 1872
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:28 pm
Location: France

Re: Gambit Rating List - May 20, 2021

Post by xr_a_y »

connor_mcmonigle wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 8:13 pm
xr_a_y wrote: Thu May 20, 2021 7:10 pm ...
More precisely
Minic 3.04 NoNo < Seer v2.0.1
Minic 3.06 NoNa ~ Seer v2.0.1
Minic 3.07 NaNo > Seer v2.0.1
Yep. I used the same network with each version number as listed above in my understanding. Your results are consistent with what I've observed in my testing. Now that you're embedding the networks, it should be easier to keep track of which network is associated with which release :)
Sure :D