The 'average' person is paying for a good - works, current, gets updates - GUI to use Stockfish (or any other free engine) in. Stockfish is...useless without a GUI to run it in. Lets not think chess people are as 'dumb' as some might like to portray them.IrishGambit wrote: ↑Fri Nov 18, 2022 11:07 pm
I think ChessBase will continue to develop Stockfish derivatives. Their average customer will probably be willing to pay some money to get a product that works out of the box instead of spending time to get the free version to run.
SF vs ChessBase declared a draw
Moderator: Ras
-
CornfedForever
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2022 4:08 am
- Full name: Brian D. Smith
Re: SF vs ChessBase declared a draw
-
smatovic
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:18 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
- Full name: Srdja Matovic
Re: SF vs ChessBase declared a draw
I like that one:

from the paper:
Srdja
wonder how that will play out in practice[...]in the future ChessBase will give appropriate credit for the use of Stockfish[...]
from the paper:
--Advertisements for products using the Stockfish software shall appropriately refer to the use of
Stockfish and comparisons of playing strength with Stockfish or other chess engines shall be truthful
and provable (e.g. by reference to appropriate current rankings) and shall refer to current versions.
Srdja
-
noobpwnftw
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 11:10 pm
- Full name: Bojun Guo
Re: SF vs ChessBase declared a draw
So, Houdini is a SF clone confirmed?
-
Modern Times
- Posts: 3782
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:02 pm
Re: SF vs ChessBase declared a draw
I can't see that the judge made any determination of that. You could say that Chessbase acknowledged the SF team's assertion that it is, but I think that is about it. What Chessbase should take away from this case though is that they should do due diligence on any such product that they offer for sale.
-
CornfedForever
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2022 4:08 am
- Full name: Brian D. Smith
Re: SF vs ChessBase declared a draw
Seriously, I think Chessbase knew they were breaking the GPL when they did it...as well as when they were taken to court and what the consequences would likely be. So, in the end, if there is no real 'punishment' (a 'slap on the wrist' is hardly 'punishment')...Chessbase 'wins' because they defacto got away with it.
I know that's an amoral way to look at things...but it is commonplace in the business world...politics...heck, life in general to many in 2022. Will to Power 101.
I know that's an amoral way to look at things...but it is commonplace in the business world...politics...heck, life in general to many in 2022. Will to Power 101.
-
noobpwnftw
- Posts: 694
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 11:10 pm
- Full name: Bojun Guo
Re: SF vs ChessBase declared a draw
Good, it seems to me that ChessBase was likely the last person next to Houdart himself who wishes to say otherwise especially when they were getting sued for it, even if they knew it was a clone.Modern Times wrote: ↑Sat Nov 19, 2022 4:16 pmI can't see that the judge made any determination of that. You could say that Chessbase acknowledged the SF team's assertion that it is, but I think that is about it. What Chessbase should take away from this case though is that they should do due diligence on any such product that they offer for sale.
As for the sentiment, before people were talking about ChessBase entrepreneurship gonna stomp the SF hippies in the legal battle, now it appears those hippies got everything they wanted with the settlement and it was apparently due to the high cost that ChessBase lost their spine. It was never about the merit and it was always someone elses' fault that got ChessBase into the trouble. ASilver is their new scapegoat? I wish they make him the FOSS compliant officer and see what happens.