Hi, we have similar ratings .I find the uci engine sargon plays at about my level. If you explore the CCRL rating list you can find other engines at about the same strength. They maybe could be downloaded. Although I use a very weak laptop (processor) in my games. I recall reading that it is better to use a weak engine at full strength than dumb down engines, I find this generally trueglav wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2023 4:14 pm I would love to use a chess engine for training my over the board (OTB) play. However, they are often well above my level of comprehension (1900 Elo) and a I would need to seriously weaken them in to level the field. I am afraid that making some simply adjustment, say lower the number of searched nodes, would not make an ideal sparring partner. Do you have any recommendation for an engine I could use? Also, what type of adjustment would you make to make it a reasonable opponent?
The author Of houdini writes on his web page (user manual) that reducing the number of positions searched reduces mainly the tactical strength of the engine but if the engine purposely choses a move it knows is suboptimal this mainly reduces positional strength of the engine. Not sure if that was a general remark or specific to Houdini.
I find stockfish ,using reduced strength level plays a reasonable game. Shashchess also. Rodent engine is a good tool (many parameters and personalities) as is Lucas chess gui.