Re1:Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote: Qa8
[d]q7/7k/r5p1/1n2Pr1p/1BpPpP1P/p1P1Q3/R6K/5R2 w - - 0 16
[d]q7/7k/r5p1/1n2Pr1p/1BpPpP1P/p1P1Q3/R6K/4R3 b - - 1 16
Stockfish has seen nothing but a 0.00 evaluation for many moves.
Gligoric-Smyslov, 1959
Moderator: Ras
-
zullil
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: Gligoric-Smyslov, 1959
[d]q7/7k/r5p1/1n2Pr1p/1BpPpP1P/p1P1Q3/R6K/4R3 b - - 1 16
Stockfish has seen nothing but a 0.00 evaluation for many moves.
-
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
- Posts: 6052
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Gligoric-Smyslov, 1959
Nc7zullil wrote:Re1:Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote: Qa8
[d]q7/7k/r5p1/1n2Pr1p/1BpPpP1P/p1P1Q3/R6K/5R2 w - - 0 16
[d]q7/7k/r5p1/1n2Pr1p/1BpPpP1P/p1P1Q3/R6K/4R3 b - - 1 16
Stockfish has seen nothing but a 0.00 evaluation for many moves.
[d]q7/2n4k/r5p1/4Pr1p/1BpPpP1P/p1P1Q3/R6K/4R3 w - - 0 17
-
zullil
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: Gligoric-Smyslov, 1959
Qxe4Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote: Nc7
[d]q7/2n4k/r5p1/4Pr1p/1BpPpP1P/p1P1Q3/R6K/4R3 w - - 0 17
[d]q7/2n4k/r5p1/4Pr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P5/R6K/4R3 b - - 0 17
-
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
- Posts: 6052
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Gligoric-Smyslov, 1959
Nd5zullil wrote:Qxe4Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote: Nc7
[d]q7/2n4k/r5p1/4Pr1p/1BpPpP1P/p1P1Q3/R6K/4R3 w - - 0 17
[d]q7/2n4k/r5p1/4Pr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P5/R6K/4R3 b - - 0 17
[d]q7/7k/r5p1/3nPr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P5/R6K/4R3 w - - 0 18
-
zullil
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: Gligoric-Smyslov, 1959
Rf1Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:
Nd5
[d]q7/7k/r5p1/3nPr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P5/R6K/4R3 w - - 0 18
[d]q7/7k/r5p1/3nPr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P5/R6K/5R2 b - - 1 18
-
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
- Posts: 6052
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Gligoric-Smyslov, 1959
Qd8zullil wrote:Rf1Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote:
Nd5
[d]q7/7k/r5p1/3nPr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P5/R6K/4R3 w - - 0 18
[d]q7/7k/r5p1/3nPr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P5/R6K/5R2 b - - 1 18
[d]3q4/7k/r5p1/3nPr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P5/R6K/5R2 w - - 0 2
-
zullil
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: Gligoric-Smyslov, 1959
Stockfish anticipated this move. In fact, since it ran while I slept, it searched to depth 60. 775028009160 nodes, with 447622042 tablebase hits. But its evaluation remains at 0. If Black had any winning chances at all here, it seems SF would have seen them. Do you still wish to play on? I'm fine either way, since my role involves almost no time or work.Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote: Qd8
[d]3q4/7k/r5p1/3nPr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P5/R6K/5R2 w - - 0 2
I'll enter your move and post SF's reply.-
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
- Posts: 6052
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Gligoric-Smyslov, 1959
I am sure Fischer would have frowned upon, if we stopped right here.zullil wrote:Stockfish anticipated this move. In fact, since it ran while I slept, it searched to depth 60. 775028009160 nodes, with 447622042 tablebase hits. But its evaluation remains at 0. If Black had any winning chances at all here, it seems SF would have seen them. Do you still wish to play on? I'm fine either way, since my role involves almost no time or work.Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote: Qd8
[d]3q4/7k/r5p1/3nPr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P5/R6K/5R2 w - - 0 2
Couple of moves from now, though, we could explain it...
-
zullil
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: Gligoric-Smyslov, 1959
OK, then SF plays Kg3:Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote: I am sure Fischer would have frowned upon, if we stopped right here.
Couple of moves from now, though, we could explain it...
[d]3q4/7k/r5p1/3nPr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P3K1/R7/5R2 b - - 1 2
-
Lyudmil Tsvetkov
- Posts: 6052
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:41 pm
Re: Gligoric-Smyslov, 1959
Qd7zullil wrote:OK, then SF plays Kg3:Lyudmil Tsvetkov wrote: I am sure Fischer would have frowned upon, if we stopped right here.
Couple of moves from now, though, we could explain it...
[d]3q4/7k/r5p1/3nPr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P3K1/R7/5R2 b - - 1 2
[d]8/3q3k/r5p1/3nPr1p/1BpPQP1P/p1P3K1/R7/5R2 w - - 0 2