Hello everyone,
I did not think to raise so much dust!
I will return here, as I wrote in another discussion of this site:
The tortuous history of DeepSaros.
I am not a professional programmer, but just an amateur. I wrote Deep Saros to employ an old version of IvanHoe. Began as a simple mod, then I started to add other ideas and other code. Something has been taken by Glaurung, Igorrit from other, more by Fruit, but other additions are my ideas ... In some cases I have taken portions of code, in other cases, only ideas that I later developed as a code.
The source program was IvanHoe, but you could still call IvanHoe? Changes are now so many ... So I decided to call it "doctor Frankenstein", then I changed my mind and I decided to call Deep Saros 2.
Deep Saros has slowly developed a personal style of play and was pleased with several people who asked me to open a web page, to download, but I speak badly English ... What to do? ... Then I saw the site of Robert Houdart and I thought, "he was surely right!" and so I have "inspired" to his page (I hope he will forgive me!).
It all started for mere personal entertainment! I did not want to raise so much fuss ... I hope I have not done anything illegal!
I apologize again for my bad English.
Roberto Munter
New Engine: Deep Saros 2.3c3
Moderator: Ras
-
Carotino
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:40 am
- Location: Italy
-
fern
- Posts: 8755
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:07 pm
Re: New Engine: Deep Saros 2.3c3
In these cases the question is: how many and how important the adds were?
After all a Porsche in a sense is the result of lot of additions to a simple car.
Fern
After all a Porsche in a sense is the result of lot of additions to a simple car.
Fern
-
JuLieN
- Posts: 2949
- Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 12:16 pm
- Location: Bordeaux (France)
- Full name: Julien Marcel
Re: New Engine: Deep Saros 2.3c3
A nice pink fur coating on the wheel would be a nice addition to a Porsche.fern wrote:In these cases the question is: how many and how important the adds were?
After all a Porsche in a sense is the result of lot of additions to a simple car.
Fern
Here's one for BMW

"The only good bug is a dead bug." (Don Dailey)
[Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]
[Blog: http://tinyurl.com/predateur ] [Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/fbpredateur ] [MacEngines: http://tinyurl.com/macengines ]
-
Dann Corbit
- Posts: 12880
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:57 pm
- Location: Redmond, WA USA
Re: New Engine: Deep Saros 2.3c3
Your original oversight was to fail to mention the origin of the program.Carotino wrote:Hello everyone,
I did not think to raise so much dust!
I will return here, as I wrote in another discussion of this site:
The tortuous history of DeepSaros.
I am not a professional programmer, but just an amateur. I wrote Deep Saros to employ an old version of IvanHoe. Began as a simple mod, then I started to add other ideas and other code. Something has been taken by Glaurung, Igorrit from other, more by Fruit, but other additions are my ideas ... In some cases I have taken portions of code, in other cases, only ideas that I later developed as a code.
The source program was IvanHoe, but you could still call IvanHoe? Changes are now so many ... So I decided to call it "doctor Frankenstein", then I changed my mind and I decided to call Deep Saros 2.
Deep Saros has slowly developed a personal style of play and was pleased with several people who asked me to open a web page, to download, but I speak badly English ... What to do? ... Then I saw the site of Robert Houdart and I thought, "he was surely right!" and so I have "inspired" to his page (I hope he will forgive me!).
It all started for mere personal entertainment! I did not want to raise so much fuss ... I hope I have not done anything illegal!
I apologize again for my bad English.
Roberto Munter
It appears that you are addressing these sorts of issues.
-
Carotino
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:40 am
- Location: Italy
Re: New Engine: Deep Saros 2.3c3
Hem ...
The web page I had open was made only for some of my friends, for my comfort... I was sick of sending my mod via e-mail.
So I do not understand how it became so "famous" ... Power of the internet!
Later I saw my name and my poor MOD appear on many websites and I thought: "Oh my God! But what happened?". So I quickly explained that the program is not original, it's just a mod, created for personal entertainment and some friends ...
I repeat: I'm just a passionate amateur who likes to play with C-language and with the chess engines. Of course, I do not want to "steal" the work of anyone!
Roberto Munter
The web page I had open was made only for some of my friends, for my comfort... I was sick of sending my mod via e-mail.
So I do not understand how it became so "famous" ... Power of the internet!
Later I saw my name and my poor MOD appear on many websites and I thought: "Oh my God! But what happened?". So I quickly explained that the program is not original, it's just a mod, created for personal entertainment and some friends ...
I repeat: I'm just a passionate amateur who likes to play with C-language and with the chess engines. Of course, I do not want to "steal" the work of anyone!
Roberto Munter
-
De Vos W
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:59 am
Re: New Engine: Deep Saros 2.3c3
zullil wrote:I don't see anything about Deep Saros 2.3c3 at this site. There is source code for 0.9 based on Fruit (or Toga), but no source for other versions.
Is this yet another engine created from the stolen Rybka code?
If the clones can easily be proven to be tweaked versions of Rybka (eg using large portions of code that didn't exist before Rybka was published) then why doesn't Vas take legal action against the "authors" of these other engines?
Gods are fragile things; they may be killed by a whiff of science or a dose of common sense.
-
zullil
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 12:31 am
- Location: PA USA
- Full name: Louis Zulli
Re: New Engine: Deep Saros 2.3c3
De Vos W wrote:I interpret this as "yes." "No" does not need such contortions.zullil wrote:De Vos W wrote:
Is this yet another engine created from the stolen Rybka code?
If the clones can easily be proven to be tweaked versions of Rybka (eg using large portions of code that didn't exist before Rybka was published) then why doesn't Vas take legal action against the "authors" of these other engines?
-
Tom Barrister
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:29 pm
Re: New Engine: Deep Saros 2.3c3
De Vos W wrote:zullil wrote:What should he list in the charges? "These people stole the code I took from Fabien Letouzey's commercial product?" Or possibly "These people stole the code I took from an open source project?"De Vos W wrote:
If the clones can easily be proven to be tweaked versions of Rybka (eg using large portions of code that didn't exist before Rybka was published) then why doesn't Vas take legal action against the "authors" of these other engines?
My understanding is that Rybka was once largely a derivative of Fruit, commercial or open source. Either way, a lawsuit seems like a case of the pot calling the kettle black.