Let me temper Peter's glowing comments with a stipulation that Crafty has been beating fruit 2.1 consistently using the new test scheme, which is no opening book, 3981 starting positions from move 15 in a large collection of good PGN games. Testing with books might produce different results, so the improvement is in the engine, rather than in the book. Books can greatly affect game results obviously...Werner wrote:Whow, that´s a surprise: about 130 elos better than version 22.1Peter Skinner wrote:I would like to state that 22.2 is _significantly_ better than the previous best version of 21.7.
In my own testing and confirmed by the way we internally test, 22.2 has become stronger than Fruit 2.1,
and here an example from my running tournament:
[Event "Bug-1"]
[Site "AMD64-X2"]
[Date "2008.11.16"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Crafty 22.2 x64 1CPU"]
[Black "BugChess2 v.1.6.3"]
[Result "1-0"]
[BlackElo "2200"]
[Time "21:32:29"]
[WhiteElo "2200"]
[TimeControl "40/900:40/900:40/900"]
[Termination "adjudication"]
[PlyCount "58"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "program"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3 e6 7. f3 b5 8.
g4 h6 9. Qd2 Nbd7 10. O-O-O Bb7 11. a3 {+0.15/13 17} d5 {0.00/13 20} 12.
exd5 {+0.20/15 17} Nxd5 {0.00/13 30} 13. Nxd5 {+0.18/14 20} Bxd5 {-0.04/13
19} 14. h4 {+0.07/13 17} e5 {+0.11/13 30} 15. Re1 {+0.22/12 18} Rc8
{-0.15/13 76} 16. Bd3 {+0.61/13 17} Nc5 {-0.24/13 33} 17. Bf4 {-0.13/12 19}
f6 {+0.03/13 28} 18. Bxe5 {+0.23/13 17} fxe5 {0.00/13 22} 19. Rxe5+
{+0.01/11 18} Kf7 {0.00/14 40} 20. Bf5 {+0.01/12 18} Rc7 {0.00/13 26} 21.
b4 {+0.01/12 18} Bxf3 {0.00/13 28} 22. bxc5 {+0.01/12 23} Bxh1 {-3.89/13
151} 23. Qd3 {+1.53/12 18} Kf6 {-4.33/11 129} 24. Re1 {+6.30/11 18} g5
{-7.34/11 25} 25. Bh7 {+9.91/12 37} Rhxh7 {-7.91/12 19} 26. hxg5+
{+10.82/12 18} hxg5 {-7.94/13 5} 27. Rf1+ {+12.61/14 18} Kg7 {-12.26/14 24}
28. Ne6+ {+15.72/15 18} Kg8 {-15.81/14 85} 29. Qxd8 {+15.89/15 21} Rhf7
{-19.77/13 20} 30. ... {1-0 Arena Entscheidung} 1-0
Caveat emptor...