No it wasn't. We stopped with 2.3.2a...CRoberson wrote:R3 was discussed by the panel.Terry McCracken wrote:Not true. They weren't reviewed by the panel beyond R 2.3.2a, others may have looked at the latter but is inconclusive.CRoberson wrote:I don't understand that statement - "encourage .... until it is proven clean". IIRC, the evidence showed that R3 and R4 were likely clean of all eval issues. That leaves only the transposition table code.Rebel wrote:I meant impose their will on the rest of the world, such as this beauty from the Panel report:hgm wrote:The ICGA can of course impose whatever they want. They could require participants to hang from the ceiling during the entire game... The WCCC is their tournament!
● encourage other tournaments (Leiden, Paderborn, CCT, TACCL, etc.) to disallow the entry of Rybka until it is proven “clean”.
Plagiarism
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: Plagiarism
-
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:16 am
- Location: Canada
Re: Plagiarism
Thanks Bob.bob wrote:No it wasn't. We stopped with 2.3.2a...CRoberson wrote:R3 was discussed by the panel.Terry McCracken wrote:Not true. They weren't reviewed by the panel beyond R 2.3.2a, others may have looked at the latter but is inconclusive.CRoberson wrote:I don't understand that statement - "encourage .... until it is proven clean". IIRC, the evidence showed that R3 and R4 were likely clean of all eval issues. That leaves only the transposition table code.Rebel wrote:I meant impose their will on the rest of the world, such as this beauty from the Panel report:hgm wrote:The ICGA can of course impose whatever they want. They could require participants to hang from the ceiling during the entire game... The WCCC is their tournament!
● encourage other tournaments (Leiden, Paderborn, CCT, TACCL, etc.) to disallow the entry of Rybka until it is proven “clean”.
P.S. He wants names.
Terry McCracken
-
- Posts: 7207
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
- Full name: Ed Schröder
Re: Plagiarism
Rebel wrote:Perhaps this split and divided community can settle on: He took too much.
Mark Lefler wrote:Ed, I think that is the best summary of this whole thing. Vasik took too much in the eyes of the panel. More than enough to call the versions of Rybka we examined to be called "derivatives", and he did not report this as required by the rules.
With your common sense please define: "too much".bhlangonijr wrote:@Ed: One of the nicest things about being human is the fact we have that what is known as "common sense". We know how to read a word or entire phrase and comprehend the semantic associations based on the context where it is given. BTW, why do you keep with this obsession? Get a life!
-
- Posts: 7207
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
- Full name: Ed Schröder
Re: Plagiarism
Apparently you have a hard time reading, not the first time I noticed. The thread started with a quote of yours:Don wrote:Hi Ed,
I want to make a plea here for a certain level of reasonableness and common sense because I believe you are being completely unreasonable.
I took the time to refute your words with a new thread.Don wrote: You are taking a dictionary definition way out of context and being unreasonable.
Plagiarism is also about ideas. Every chess programmer can code but the main secret to success is not to code but about ideas, new ideas especially. An average programmer with excellent ideas can lead the field, an expert programmer with average ideas never will.
Like Levy the use of the word plagiarism is just wrong and your mouth was also full of it in the thread I was referring too.
-
- Posts: 2016
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: Plagiarism
"Took too much" is complicated, we must discuss this, and then there will be many opinions and then Fern will be mad again for so many posts.Rebel wrote:Rebel wrote:Perhaps this split and divided community can settle on: He took too much.Mark Lefler wrote:Ed, I think that is the best summary of this whole thing. Vasik took too much in the eyes of the panel. More than enough to call the versions of Rybka we examined to be called "derivatives", and he did not report this as required by the rules.With your common sense please define: "too much".bhlangonijr wrote:@Ed: One of the nicest things about being human is the fact we have that what is known as "common sense". We know how to read a word or entire phrase and comprehend the semantic associations based on the context where it is given. BTW, why do you keep with this obsession? Get a life!
1. Took too much and she left him.
2. Took too much cash and they got him on camera.
3. Took too much beer and got a DUI.
4. Took too much at the buffet and got sick.
5. Took too much code and made the world news.
kgburcham
-
- Posts: 7207
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
- Full name: Ed Schröder
Re: Plagiarism
Show me where.bob wrote: How about typing something that actually makes sense? "Computer software plagiarism." Read some of the stuff you get there.
-
- Posts: 8755
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:07 pm
Re: Plagiarism
That was the idea.
BTW, It looks like you have some rotted tooth.
BTW, It looks like you have some rotted tooth.
-
- Posts: 5106
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:27 pm
Re: Plagiarism
Ed,Rebel wrote:Show me where.bob wrote: How about typing something that actually makes sense? "Computer software plagiarism." Read some of the stuff you get there.
Is this software plagiarism:
for (;;) {
...
}
I use that for infinite loops and I saw the idea somewhere, it's not my own, I don't remember where.
I have never (at least until now) given credit for this idea which is in Komodo.
By the "dictionary" definition of plagiarism which you take absolutely literal, I am a plagiarist. Do you agree that this construct makes me a plagiarist?
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: Plagiarism
Anything that is "significant". I think the evaluation of fruit is "too much". I think that the complete source of Crafty 19.x to create rybka 1.6.1 was beyond even "too much."Rebel wrote:Rebel wrote:Perhaps this split and divided community can settle on: He took too much.Mark Lefler wrote:Ed, I think that is the best summary of this whole thing. Vasik took too much in the eyes of the panel. More than enough to call the versions of Rybka we examined to be called "derivatives", and he did not report this as required by the rules.With your common sense please define: "too much".bhlangonijr wrote:@Ed: One of the nicest things about being human is the fact we have that what is known as "common sense". We know how to read a word or entire phrase and comprehend the semantic associations based on the context where it is given. BTW, why do you keep with this obsession? Get a life!
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: Plagiarism
The ONLY discussion about R3/R4 by the panel was "should we do this RE effort again, or does the R1/R2 evidence convince us that it is now time for Vas to come forward and produce the source for R3/R4 if he wants to continue to compete (if those versions were clean). We did not discuss 3/4 from a RE perspective. Nor did we investigate R3/R4 and find them "clean" as "some" want to purport...Terry McCracken wrote:Thanks Bob.bob wrote:No it wasn't. We stopped with 2.3.2a...CRoberson wrote:R3 was discussed by the panel.Terry McCracken wrote:Not true. They weren't reviewed by the panel beyond R 2.3.2a, others may have looked at the latter but is inconclusive.CRoberson wrote:I don't understand that statement - "encourage .... until it is proven clean". IIRC, the evidence showed that R3 and R4 were likely clean of all eval issues. That leaves only the transposition table code.Rebel wrote:I meant impose their will on the rest of the world, such as this beauty from the Panel report:hgm wrote:The ICGA can of course impose whatever they want. They could require participants to hang from the ceiling during the entire game... The WCCC is their tournament!
● encourage other tournaments (Leiden, Paderborn, CCT, TACCL, etc.) to disallow the entry of Rybka until it is proven “clean”.
P.S. He wants names.