Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:I don't believe in the myth of Houdini 3 being the strongest chess engine by September....
Houdini will be surpassed by at least two chess engines by the end of the year....
...
Dr.D
What are these two engines? One is Komodo 4 MP, right? What is the other one?
Thanks
No....Komodo is not one of them
Patience people,patience....
Dr.D
I think the two engines you are referring to are Strelka and Critter.
But Richard Vada has already said that the next Critter will not be much stronger and Strelka...well....um....it's kinda like Houdini 1.5
Patience is a virtue they say
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:I don't believe in the myth of Houdini 3 being the strongest chess engine by September....
Houdini will be surpassed by at least two chess engines by the end of the year....
...
Dr.D
What are these two engines? One is Komodo 4 MP, right? What is the other one?
Thanks
I believe that the best chances is not for komodo but for rybka5 but my guess is that houdini is going to be the best engine at the end of 2012.
No it won't....
Robert is just bluffing....
He's seeking every opportunity to look into other chess engines anatomy trying to find something to snatch and adapt it to Houdini....
Robert is pretty much like Hollywood nowadays....he's running out of ideas
Dr.D
I agree entirely. The last engine was having ideas stolen Chiron. Look at the use of bases scorpions.
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
Carlos Ylich wrote:
I agree entirely. The last engine was having ideas stolen Chiron. Look at the use of bases scorpions.
Would you please explain the meaning of what you wrote above?
Guenter
Houdini is a work of Frankenstein. Copying parts of other engines. Ideas copied and whose sources are not cited. When its author want some new idea, copies of other engines. See latest news for Houdini. Nothing but the copy of scorpions bitbases Chiron.
Carlos Ylich wrote:
I agree entirely. The last engine was having ideas stolen Chiron. Look at the use of bases scorpions.
Would you please explain the meaning of what you wrote above?
Guenter
Houdini is a work of Frankenstein. Copying parts of other engines. Ideas copied and whose sources are not cited. When its author want some new idea, copies of other engines. See latest news for Houdini. Nothing but the copy of scorpions bitbases Chiron.
Would you please stay on topic, because I asked nothing about Houdini?
I asked about what you wrote about Chiron and Scorpio and I still have no clue what you mean.
Who stole what from whom in your opinion?
Carlos Ylich wrote:
I agree entirely. The last engine was having ideas stolen Chiron. Look at the use of bases scorpions.
Would you please explain the meaning of what you wrote above?
Guenter
Houdini is a work of Frankenstein. Copying parts of other engines. Ideas copied and whose sources are not cited. When its author want some new idea, copies of other engines. See latest news for Houdini. Nothing but the copy of scorpions bitbases Chiron.
Would you please stay on topic, because I asked nothing about Houdini?
I asked about what you wrote about Chiron and Scorpio and I still have no clue what you mean.
Who stole what from whom in your opinion?
Carlos can clarify, but I believe he is referring to the fact that Houdini 3 will make use of 5-man Scorpio bitbases, as Chiron already does. Carlos seems to feel that Robert Houdart's decision to incorporate this feature into Houdini somehow represents "theft" from Chiron. But perhaps I'm misunderstanding his posts.
Carlos Ylich wrote:
I agree entirely. The last engine was having ideas stolen Chiron. Look at the use of bases scorpions.
Would you please explain the meaning of what you wrote above?
Guenter
Houdini is a work of Frankenstein. Copying parts of other engines. Ideas copied and whose sources are not cited. When its author want some new idea, copies of other engines. See latest news for Houdini. Nothing but the copy of scorpions bitbases Chiron.
Would you please stay on topic, because I asked nothing about Houdini?
I asked about what you wrote about Chiron and Scorpio and I still have no clue what you mean.
Who stole what from whom in your opinion?
Carlos can clarify, but I believe he is referring to the fact that Houdini 3 will make use of 5-man Scorpio bitbases, as Chiron already does. Carlos seems to feel that Robert Houdart's decision to incorporate this feature into Houdini somehow represents "theft" from Chiron. But perhaps I'm misunderstanding his posts.
Well, the Scorpio egbb were made for use in other programs and a lot of programs used them looong before Chiron.
Thus it makes no sense in multiple ways, what we both know. Therefore I tried to ask for clarification what he might mean,
but the answers look always quite babelfishy to me.
Carlos Ylich wrote:
I agree entirely. The last engine was having ideas stolen Chiron. Look at the use of bases scorpions.
Would you please explain the meaning of what you wrote above?
Guenter
Houdini is a work of Frankenstein. Copying parts of other engines. Ideas copied and whose sources are not cited. When its author want some new idea, copies of other engines. See latest news for Houdini. Nothing but the copy of scorpions bitbases Chiron.
Would you please stay on topic, because I asked nothing about Houdini?
I asked about what you wrote about Chiron and Scorpio and I still have no clue what you mean.
Who stole what from whom in your opinion?
Carlos can clarify, but I believe he is referring to the fact that Houdini 3 will make use of 5-man Scorpio bitbases, as Chiron already does. Carlos seems to feel that Robert Houdart's decision to incorporate this feature into Houdini somehow represents "theft" from Chiron. But perhaps I'm misunderstanding his posts.
Well, the Scorpio egbb were made for use in other programs and a lot of programs used them looong before Chiron.
Thus it makes no sense in multiple ways, what we both know. Therefore I tried to ask for clarification what he might mean,
but the answers look always quite babelfishy to me.
I think it's admirable that he's working to communicate in English. (In fact, I'm always very impressed by the quality of the posts here by so many people who have learned English as a second or third language.) Had I not been born to English-speaking parents, I'm pretty sure I'd never have been able to learn this awful language!
