lech wrote:
Peter, after a small modification of Blathy study (without h pawns), I think Sting 5 is not able to solve it without "a lazzy King" code. Am I sure?
[d]k1b5/1p1p1p2/1PpPpP2/2B5/8/2p1p3/2PbP3/3K4 w - - 0 1
lech wrote:
Peter, after a small modification of Blathy study (without h pawns), I think Sting 5 is not able to solve it without "a lazzy King" code. Am I sure?
[d]k1b5/1p1p1p2/1PpPpP2/2B5/8/2p1p3/2PbP3/3K4 w - - 0 1
Now white King should go to take the Pawn f7.
How does White win here?
EDIT: OK, never mind.
EDIT: Not OK, I don't see how White wins this.
With zugzwang.
The white bishop goes to c7, after which black is in zugzwang and should move its c6 and e6 pawns; after those reach c4 and e4 and the white bishop is on c7 again, something that it can achieve, as it has spare moves, black should sacrifice its bishop on either c1 or e1, after which..., after which... it is simple stalemate.
Edit: not certain if the above position is the real one, there were some other pawns on the h file.
The original position with h3 and h7 pawns added is a win though - white executes exactly the same plan, but black has a spare move with its h pawn, that can go at most to h5, after which h5-h4 is a spare move, so no stalemate.
If black h7 goes to h4, it is taken and h3 promotes.
If it is black's turn though, it is a draw, as e5 draws for black, shutting the white bishop on the queen side; so Bd4 is the only winning move.
Man, do not these guys have some more difficult studies?
lech wrote:
Peter, after a small modification of Blathy study (without h pawns), I think Sting 5 is not able to solve it without "a lazzy King" code. Am I sure?
[d]k1b5/1p1p1p2/1PpPpP2/2B5/8/2p1p3/2PbP3/3K4 w - - 0 1
Now white King should go to take the Pawn f7.
How does White win here?
EDIT: OK, never mind.
EDIT: Not OK, I don't see how White wins this.
With zugzwang.
The white bishop goes to c7, after which black is in zugzwang and should move its c6 and e6 pawns; after those reach c4 and e4 and the white bishop is on c7 again, something that it can achieve, as it has spare moves, black should sacrifice its bishop on either c1 or e1, after which..., after which... it is simple stalemate.
Yes, for example, the bishop goes to c1. If the king captures, then stalemate. If not, the bishop goes to a3 and then captures on d6.
lech wrote:
Peter, after a small modification of Blathy study (without h pawns), I think Sting 5 is not able to solve it without "a lazzy King" code. Am I sure?
[d]k1b5/1p1p1p2/1PpPpP2/2B5/8/2p1p3/2PbP3/3K4 w - - 0 1
Now white King should go to take the Pawn f7.
How does White win here?
EDIT: OK, never mind.
EDIT: Not OK, I don't see how White wins this.
With zugzwang.
The white bishop goes to c7, after which black is in zugzwang and should move its c6 and e6 pawns; after those reach c4 and e4 and the white bishop is on c7 again, something that it can achieve, as it has spare moves, black should sacrifice its bishop on either c1 or e1, after which..., after which... it is simple stalemate.
Yes, for example, the bishop goes to c1. If the king captures, then stalemate. If not, the bishop goes to a3 and then captures on d6.
So no win in Marek's modified study?
Well, the king might still try to overfly to g7 directly, to capture the f7 pawn - this will be a real lazy king.
Here is YACPDB: http://www.yacpdb.org/
You can paste a position in the slot next to the "Add" button and then press "Search" and it will try to look up the position.
Very nice collection.
Thanks for posting this.
But I don't seem to get the point of the first position, [black to move] but black will lose in all variations.
Sorry, Marek, didn't see your posting till now, but I don't see how White wins in your modification neither.
Black cannot be forced to take on e1 or c1, if White takes Bishop d2, its King still must not leave the now free black d- Pawn.
Did I miss something?
On deeper analysis, position 4 seems to be a forced mate in 68 with best defence from black. {Best defence for black simply meant avoiding any pawn move if possible}.
If white pushes his white pawn to h4 anytime, it will be a draw because the point of holding h3 pawn is to force black to play his h7 pawn into h4 and that will be taken by white's D.S.Bishop and a winning h-passer for white.
edit: modifying the position without both h-pawn is just draw
peter wrote:Sorry, Marek, didn't see your posting till now, but I don't see how White wins in your modification neither.
Black cannot be forced to take on e1 or c1, if White takes Bishop d2, its King still must not leave the now free black d- Pawn.
Did I miss something?
Indeed it looks like impossible to solve. Now I understand why Sting 5 solves the original version of Blathy study. The white Bishop makes all what is needed to win.