That is better, but it still should be possible to do it about 10 times faster.Nordlandia wrote:2-5 min is way off! Yes it's under 5 seconds!
Q vs NN imbalance
Moderator: Ras
-
hgm
- Posts: 28515
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Q vs. NN imbalance.
-
duncan
- Posts: 12038
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:50 pm
Re: Q vs. NN imbalance.
I thought it would not be able to solve it.Nordlandia wrote:
2-5 min is way off! Yes it's under 5 seconds!
http://finalgenchess.ovh/home_ing.php
A major limitation of FinalGen is that it can only manage endgames with up to one minor or major piece per side, and any number of pawns. Consequently, endgames in which there are 3 knights and king versus a king cannot be solved.
-
duncan
- Posts: 12038
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:50 pm
Re: Q vs. NN imbalance.
maybe bit of a wait for that.Nordlandia wrote: Why can't FinalGen take advantage of multi-core CPU's, it will for sure speed up the generating process by a factor or 2,4 or even 8 times depending on hardware.
http://finalgenchess.ovh/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=50
I wondered if there are any news about an eventual new version. Will that then be 64bit? (since you said that would be required for various new features)
Vetinari (engine)
...........
Top
Re: New Version?
Postby pPerez » Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:57 pm
Hello,
I would like very much to continue developing this project, but for now it is not possible.
I will resume the projet in the future, but it is not planned in the next 5 or 6 years.
Regards,
Pedro Pérez