Hi Jörg,
and the end of Contempt Topic after three years for myself. I am ready in a short time with my list and need really a break. Each day to work on the book and to checked the games was a lot of work in the last three years.
Stockfish and Komodo ... are to strong for me and only with such little tricks I can find out a bit. Possible only with a strong book I have now.
Enough ... 20 days ... 4 test-runs only ... and chess vacation in the near!
Best
Frank
Maybe the others can do a bit with all the information I found out, also about Contempt in the last years.
FCP: SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 C10 vs. 49 opp. EXPERIMENT
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 6886
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
-
- Posts: 6886
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: Stats ... ratings with and without Contempt!
For the Rating List place 01-25 = Naum 4.6 x64 with 2885 Elo.
For the Rating List place 25-50 = Zappa Mexico II x64 with 2752 Elo.
Have a look here (extract from FCP-Rating List, each one against each other):
The final results:
In both cases 25 lesser draw games!
= 50 (the final result was 50 lesser draw games)
1.
SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 C10, places 1-25:
The Contempt = 10 version!
2.
SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64, places 1-25:
3.
SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 C10, places 26-50:
The Contempt = 10 version!
4.
SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64, places 26-50:
For the Rating List place 25-50 = Zappa Mexico II x64 with 2752 Elo.
Have a look here (extract from FCP-Rating List, each one against each other):
Code: Select all
# Player : Elo Games Score% won draw lost Points Draw% Error OppAvg OppE OppD
18 Naum 4.6 x64 : 2885.00 2450 55.6 796 1134 520 1363.0 46.3 10.15 2843.91 10.68 49.0
36 Zappa Mexico II x64 : 2751.95 2450 38.7 403 1092 955 949.0 44.6 10.03 2846.63 10.68 49.0
The final results:
Code: Select all
Place 01-25
# Player : Elo Games Score% won draw lost Points Draw% Error OppAvg OppE OppD
1 SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 C10 : 3233.11 1200 82.7 792 401 7 992.5 33.4 17.20 2941.22 13.63 24.0 + 15,64
1 SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 : 3217.47 1200 81.3 763 426 11 976.0 35.5 16.87 2942.83 13.63 24.0
Place 26-50
# Player : Elo Games Score% won draw lost Points Draw% Error OppAvg OppE OppD
1 SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 C10 : 3190.45 1250 92.8 1071 179 0 1160.5 14.3 25.09 2734.19 13.91 25.0 + 25,12
1 SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 : 3165.33 1250 91.8 1045 204 1 1147.0 16.3 23.38 2735.95 13.90 25.0
= 50 (the final result was 50 lesser draw games)
1.
SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 C10, places 1-25:
The Contempt = 10 version!
Code: Select all
# Player : Elo Games Score% won draw lost Points Draw% Error OppAvg OppE OppD
1 SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 C10 : 3233.11 1200 82.7 792 401 7 992.5 33.4 17.20 2941.22 13.63 24.0
2 Komodo 10 x64 : 3195.84 1200 79.4 740 426 34 953.0 35.5 16.11 2942.77 13.68 24.0
3 Houdini 4 STD B x64 : 3076.61 1200 66.5 537 522 141 798.0 43.5 13.99 2947.74 13.76 24.0
4 Fire 4 x64 : 3033.92 1200 61.1 434 599 167 733.5 49.9 13.89 2949.52 13.77 24.0
5 GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 : 3031.66 1200 60.8 424 612 164 730.0 51.0 14.12 2949.61 13.76 24.0
6 Fizbo 1.8 BMI2 x64 : 3007.23 1200 57.6 386 611 203 691.5 50.9 13.31 2950.63 13.79 24.0
7 Equinox 3.30 x64 : 3004.41 1200 57.3 366 642 192 687.0 53.5 13.14 2950.75 13.80 24.0
8 Andscacs 0.872 BMI2 x64 : 2995.66 1200 56.1 365 616 219 673.0 51.3 13.03 2951.11 13.80 24.0
9 Critter 1.6a x64 : 2978.63 1200 53.8 336 619 245 645.5 51.6 13.04 2951.82 13.80 24.0
10 Fritz 15 x64 : 2977.70 1200 53.7 333 622 245 644.0 51.8 12.92 2951.86 13.81 24.0
11 Nirvanachess 2.3 POP x64 : 2962.94 1200 51.7 279 682 239 620.0 56.8 13.31 2952.48 13.79 24.0
12 Hannibal 1.7 x64 : 2962.63 1200 51.6 309 621 270 619.5 51.8 13.11 2952.49 13.80 24.0
13 Chiron 3 x64 : 2947.62 1200 49.6 283 624 293 595.0 52.0 13.14 2953.12 13.80 24.0
14 Texel 1.06 x64 : 2933.53 1200 47.7 268 608 324 572.0 50.7 13.36 2953.70 13.79 24.0
15 Protector 1.9.0 x64 : 2928.93 1200 47.0 236 657 307 564.5 54.8 13.47 2953.89 13.79 24.0
16 iCE 3.0 v658 POP x64 : 2921.26 1200 46.0 256 592 352 552.0 49.3 13.79 2954.21 13.77 24.0
17 Booot 6.0.2 POP x64 : 2901.82 1200 43.4 212 617 371 520.5 51.4 13.01 2955.02 13.80 24.0
18 Hakkapeliitta TCEC v2 x64 : 2887.82 1200 41.5 244 508 448 498.0 42.3 13.70 2955.61 13.78 24.0
19 Naum 4.6 x64 : 2885.00 1200 41.1 194 599 407 493.5 49.9 13.20 2955.72 13.80 24.0
20 SmarThink 1.96 SSE4 x64 : 2873.67 1200 39.6 219 513 468 475.5 42.8 13.03 2956.20 13.80 24.0
21 Vajolet2 2.2 POP x64 : 2830.58 1200 34.1 149 520 531 409.0 43.3 14.07 2957.99 13.76 24.0
22 Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64 : 2828.24 1200 33.8 145 521 534 405.5 43.4 13.86 2958.09 13.77 24.0
23 Pedone 1.4.1 BMI2 x64 : 2816.09 1200 32.3 109 557 534 387.5 46.4 14.38 2958.60 13.75 24.0
24 Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 : 2815.41 1200 32.2 130 513 557 386.5 42.8 13.90 2958.62 13.77 24.0
25 Sjeng c't 2010 w32 : 2792.08 1200 29.4 111 484 605 353.0 40.3 14.26 2959.60 13.75 24.0
White advantage = 34.75 +/- 2.10
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 56.82 % +/- 0.47
2.
SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64, places 1-25:
Code: Select all
# Player : Elo Games Score% won draw lost Points Draw% Error OppAvg OppE OppD
1 SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 : 3217.47 1200 81.3 763 426 11 976.0 35.5 16.87 2942.83 13.63 24.0
2 Komodo 10 x64 : 3199.49 1200 79.7 744 425 31 956.5 35.4 16.15 2943.58 13.66 24.0
3 Houdini 4 STD B x64 : 3080.21 1200 66.8 538 528 134 802.0 44.0 13.99 2948.55 13.75 24.0
4 Fire 4 x64 : 3034.89 1200 61.1 434 599 167 733.5 49.9 13.93 2950.44 13.76 24.0
5 GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 : 3032.33 1200 60.8 424 611 165 729.5 50.9 14.18 2950.55 13.75 24.0
6 Fizbo 1.8 BMI2 x64 : 3007.33 1200 57.5 386 608 206 690.0 50.7 13.25 2951.59 13.78 24.0
7 Equinox 3.30 x64 : 3002.95 1200 56.9 366 634 200 683.0 52.8 13.11 2951.77 13.79 24.0
8 Andscacs 0.872 BMI2 x64 : 2996.42 1200 56.0 365 615 220 672.5 51.3 13.01 2952.04 13.79 24.0
9 Critter 1.6a x64 : 2980.65 1200 53.9 335 624 241 647.0 52.0 13.04 2952.70 13.79 24.0
10 Fritz 15 x64 : 2979.72 1200 53.8 333 625 242 645.5 52.1 12.96 2952.74 13.80 24.0
11 Hannibal 1.7 x64 : 2964.68 1200 51.8 308 626 266 621.0 52.2 13.05 2953.37 13.79 24.0
12 Nirvanachess 2.3 POP x64 : 2962.23 1200 51.4 279 676 245 617.0 56.3 13.31 2953.47 13.78 24.0
13 Chiron 3 x64 : 2948.77 1200 49.6 283 624 293 595.0 52.0 13.22 2954.03 13.79 24.0
14 Texel 1.06 x64 : 2936.54 1200 47.9 268 614 318 575.0 51.2 13.28 2954.54 13.78 24.0
15 Protector 1.9.0 x64 : 2931.04 1200 47.2 236 660 304 566.0 55.0 13.53 2954.77 13.77 24.0
16 iCE 3.0 v658 POP x64 : 2922.45 1200 46.0 256 592 352 552.0 49.3 13.79 2955.13 13.76 24.0
17 Booot 6.0.2 POP x64 : 2903.67 1200 43.5 211 621 368 521.5 51.8 13.03 2955.91 13.79 24.0
18 Hakkapeliitta TCEC v2 x64 : 2892.50 1200 42.0 245 517 438 503.5 43.1 13.67 2956.37 13.77 24.0
19 Naum 4.6 x64 : 2885.00 1200 41.0 194 595 411 491.5 49.6 13.17 2956.69 13.79 24.0
20 SmarThink 1.96 SSE4 x64 : 2877.46 1200 40.0 220 519 461 479.5 43.3 13.10 2957.00 13.79 24.0
21 Vajolet2 2.2 POP x64 : 2831.56 1200 34.0 149 519 532 408.5 43.3 14.11 2958.91 13.75 24.0
22 Senpai 1.0 SSE42 x64 : 2828.22 1200 33.6 145 517 538 403.5 43.1 13.83 2959.05 13.76 24.0
23 Pedone 1.4.1 BMI2 x64 : 2820.14 1200 32.6 109 565 526 391.5 47.1 14.24 2959.39 13.74 24.0
24 Hiarcs 14 WCSC w32 : 2818.45 1200 32.4 130 518 552 389.0 43.2 13.96 2959.46 13.75 24.0
25 Sjeng c't 2010 w32 : 2791.31 1200 29.2 111 478 611 350.0 39.8 14.32 2960.59 13.74 24.0
White advantage = 34.51 +/- 2.11
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 56.83 % +/- 0.47
3.
SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 C10, places 26-50:
The Contempt = 10 version!
Code: Select all
# Player : Elo Games Score% won draw lost Points Draw% Error OppAvg OppE OppD
1 SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 C10 : 3190.45 1250 92.8 1071 179 0 1160.5 14.3 25.09 2734.19 13.91 25.0
2 Cheng 4.39 x64 : 2799.15 1250 57.3 430 573 247 716.5 45.8 14.42 2749.85 14.34 25.0
3 Arasan 19.1 POP x64 : 2791.58 1250 56.3 416 575 259 703.5 46.0 13.86 2750.15 14.36 25.0
4 Shredder 12 x64 : 2788.68 1250 55.9 420 557 273 698.5 44.6 13.53 2750.26 14.38 25.0
5 Junior 13.3.00 x64 : 2783.77 1250 55.2 417 546 287 690.0 43.7 13.95 2750.46 14.36 25.0
6 Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 : 2779.16 1250 54.6 403 558 289 682.0 44.6 14.48 2750.65 14.34 25.0
7 Wasp 1.25 BMI2 x64 : 2778.58 1250 54.5 385 592 273 681.0 47.4 13.99 2750.67 14.36 25.0
8 Quazar 0.4 x64 : 2772.55 1250 53.6 390 561 299 670.5 44.9 14.12 2750.91 14.35 25.0
9 DiscoCheck 5.2.1 x64 : 2769.98 1250 53.3 409 514 327 666.0 41.1 13.83 2751.01 14.37 25.0
10 Bobcat 7.6 x64 : 2762.54 1250 52.2 354 598 298 653.0 47.8 13.27 2751.31 14.39 25.0
11 Deuterium 14.3.34.130 POP x64 : 2756.84 1250 51.4 339 608 303 643.0 48.6 13.96 2751.54 14.36 25.0
12 Zappa Mexico II x64 : 2752.00 1250 50.8 335 599 316 634.5 47.9 14.20 2751.73 14.35 25.0
13 Spark 1.0 x64 : 2751.72 1250 50.7 350 568 332 634.0 45.4 13.57 2751.74 14.38 25.0
14 TogaII 280513 Intel w32 : 2733.81 1250 48.2 337 531 382 602.5 42.5 13.58 2752.46 14.38 25.0
15 Gaviota 1.0 AVX x64 : 2731.82 1250 47.9 332 534 384 599.0 42.7 13.91 2752.54 14.36 25.0
16 Crafty 25.0.1 JA POP x64 : 2722.71 1250 46.6 296 574 380 583.0 45.9 13.60 2752.90 14.37 25.0
17 Rodent II 0.9.33 x64 : 2717.30 1250 45.9 287 573 390 573.5 45.8 13.40 2753.12 14.38 25.0
18 Dirty 03NOV2015 POP x64 : 2716.21 1250 45.7 288 567 395 571.5 45.4 14.22 2753.16 14.35 25.0
19 Atlas 3.80 x64 : 2714.73 1250 45.5 285 568 397 569.0 45.4 14.13 2753.22 14.35 25.0
20 EXchess 7.92b x64 : 2709.02 1250 44.7 257 604 389 559.0 48.3 13.93 2753.45 14.36 25.0
21 Murka 3 x64 : 2704.73 1250 44.1 260 583 407 551.5 46.6 13.67 2753.62 14.37 25.0
22 DisasterArea 1.65 POP x64 : 2696.11 1250 42.9 244 585 421 536.5 46.8 13.95 2753.97 14.36 25.0
23 Nemo 1.01 Beta POP x64 : 2692.31 1250 42.4 247 566 437 530.0 45.3 14.30 2754.12 14.35 25.0
24 Rhetoric 1.4.3 POP x64 : 2657.50 1250 37.6 219 503 528 470.5 40.2 14.09 2755.51 14.35 25.0
25 Octochess r5506 DC x64 : 2656.30 1250 37.5 198 541 511 468.5 43.3 13.81 2755.56 14.37 25.0
26 Laser 1.1 POP x64 : 2615.76 1250 32.2 146 513 591 402.5 41.0 14.07 2757.18 14.36 25.0
White advantage = 30.41 +/- 2.11
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 48.38 % +/- 0.41
4.
SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64, places 26-50:
Code: Select all
# Player : Elo Games Score% won draw lost Points Draw% Error OppAvg OppE OppD
1 SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 : 3165.33 1250 91.8 1045 204 1 1147.0 16.3 23.38 2735.95 13.90 25.0
2 Cheng 4.39 x64 : 2803.10 1250 57.7 430 582 238 721.0 46.6 14.42 2750.44 14.25 25.0
3 Arasan 19.1 POP x64 : 2792.63 1250 56.2 416 574 260 703.0 45.9 13.89 2750.86 14.27 25.0
4 Shredder 12 x64 : 2791.47 1250 56.1 420 562 268 701.0 45.0 13.45 2750.91 14.29 25.0
5 Junior 13.3.00 x64 : 2786.57 1250 55.4 417 551 282 692.5 44.1 13.97 2751.10 14.27 25.0
6 Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 : 2781.39 1250 54.7 403 561 286 683.5 44.9 14.43 2751.31 14.25 25.0
7 Wasp 1.25 BMI2 x64 : 2779.38 1250 54.4 385 590 275 680.0 47.2 14.01 2751.39 14.27 25.0
8 Quazar 0.4 x64 : 2773.36 1250 53.6 390 559 301 669.5 44.7 14.05 2751.63 14.27 25.0
9 DiscoCheck 5.2.1 x64 : 2773.08 1250 53.5 409 520 321 669.0 41.6 13.88 2751.64 14.28 25.0
10 Bobcat 7.6 x64 : 2763.66 1250 52.2 354 597 299 652.5 47.8 13.27 2752.02 14.30 25.0
11 Deuterium 14.3.34.130 POP x64 : 2757.97 1250 51.4 339 607 304 642.5 48.6 13.92 2752.25 14.27 25.0
12 Spark 1.0 x64 : 2754.27 1250 50.9 351 570 329 636.0 45.6 13.58 2752.39 14.29 25.0
13 Zappa Mexico II x64 : 2752.00 1250 50.6 335 594 321 632.0 47.5 14.13 2752.48 14.27 25.0
14 TogaII 280513 Intel w32 : 2736.39 1250 48.4 337 535 378 604.5 42.8 13.61 2753.11 14.29 25.0
15 Gaviota 1.0 AVX x64 : 2732.13 1250 47.8 332 530 388 597.0 42.4 13.87 2753.28 14.28 25.0
16 Crafty 25.0.1 JA POP x64 : 2724.46 1250 46.7 296 575 379 583.5 46.0 13.62 2753.59 14.29 25.0
17 Dirty 03NOV2015 POP x64 : 2717.68 1250 45.7 288 567 395 571.5 45.4 14.10 2753.86 14.27 25.0
18 Rodent II 0.9.33 x64 : 2717.64 1250 45.7 287 569 394 571.5 45.5 13.43 2753.86 14.29 25.0
19 Atlas 3.80 x64 : 2717.35 1250 45.7 285 572 393 571.0 45.8 14.11 2753.87 14.27 25.0
20 EXchess 7.92b x64 : 2710.51 1250 44.7 257 604 389 559.0 48.3 13.93 2754.14 14.27 25.0
21 Murka 3 x64 : 2705.36 1250 44.0 260 580 410 550.0 46.4 13.67 2754.35 14.28 25.0
22 DisasterArea 1.65 POP x64 : 2697.61 1250 42.9 244 585 421 536.5 46.8 13.95 2754.66 14.27 25.0
23 Nemo 1.01 Beta POP x64 : 2694.11 1250 42.4 247 567 436 530.5 45.4 14.27 2754.80 14.26 25.0
24 Rhetoric 1.4.3 POP x64 : 2660.53 1250 37.8 219 508 523 473.0 40.6 14.05 2756.14 14.27 25.0
25 Octochess r5506 DC x64 : 2657.85 1250 37.5 198 541 511 468.5 43.3 13.79 2756.25 14.28 25.0
26 Laser 1.1 POP x64 : 2618.29 1250 32.3 146 516 588 404.0 41.3 13.98 2757.83 14.27 25.0
White advantage = 30.02 +/- 2.10
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 48.40 % +/- 0.41
-
- Posts: 6886
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: In my opinion ...
In my opinion the following question is not important ...
Without contempt vs. stronger or with Contempt vs. weaker opponents!
The result is the same ...
With Contempt = 10 is Stockfish around 15-20 Elo stronger, that is exactly the result I wrote in my first message (Logical after the last "Fight for Place 1". I wrote ... "Stockfish now with full power with Contempt = 10"!
Sorry, but I know the results before, so I am very sure here.
Enough ... enough is enough, means ... I have enough from Contempt!
Have a nice night!
Best
Frank
Without contempt vs. stronger or with Contempt vs. weaker opponents!
The result is the same ...
With Contempt = 10 is Stockfish around 15-20 Elo stronger, that is exactly the result I wrote in my first message (Logical after the last "Fight for Place 1". I wrote ... "Stockfish now with full power with Contempt = 10"!
Sorry, but I know the results before, so I am very sure here.
Enough ... enough is enough, means ... I have enough from Contempt!
Have a nice night!
Best
Frank
-
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: Comparsion ... how contempt is working, nice to see!
Hi Frank,Frank Quisinsky wrote: Hint:
All pages are now updated, if you like you can make your own stats. Please download the complete database or the database for statistics or under download games by players the Stockfish games.
Thanks for the hint. I was not aware that the games could be downloaded.
I selected the games of Stockfish with and withoud contempt versus the top 15 opponents. I got this:
Code: Select all
# Player : Elo Games Score% won draw lost Points Draw% Error OppAvg OppE OppN
1 SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 C10 : 3249.73 750 78.7 437 307 6 590.5 40.9 15.18 3009.66 38.72 30
2 SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 : 3239.67 750 77.8 426 315 9 583.5 42.0 22.03 3009.66 38.72 30
Which is interesting, is that SF C=10 gets the advantage against the strongest (Komodo and Houdini), I thought SF without contempt would do better (although, the number of games per match is relatively small.)
Code: Select all
Head to head statistics:
1) SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 C10 3249.73 : 750 (+437,=307,-6), 78.7 %
vs. : games ( +, =, -), (%) : Diff, SD, CFS (%)
Komodo 10 x64 : 50 ( 17, 32, 1), 66.0 : +40.03, 11.80, 100.0
Houdini 4 STD B x64 : 50 ( 29, 20, 1), 78.0 : +173.92, 15.14, 100.0
Fizbo 1.8 BMI2 x64 : 50 ( 23, 26, 1), 72.0 : +200.56, 18.48, 100.0
GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 : 50 ( 22, 28, 0), 72.0 : +213.01, 18.48, 100.0
Fire 4 x64 : 50 ( 27, 23, 0), 77.0 : +222.64, 23.80, 100.0
Equinox 3.30 x64 : 50 ( 25, 24, 1), 74.0 : +229.21, 23.26, 100.0
Andscacs 0.872 BMI2 x64 : 50 ( 30, 20, 0), 80.0 : +242.74, 27.68, 100.0
Critter 1.6a x64 : 50 ( 30, 19, 1), 79.0 : +249.73, 24.53, 100.0
Hannibal 1.7 x64 : 50 ( 36, 13, 1), 85.0 : +264.18, 18.96, 100.0
Texel 1.06 x64 : 50 ( 35, 15, 0), 85.0 : +271.68, 30.06, 100.0
Nirvanachess 2.3 POP x64 : 50 ( 28, 22, 0), 78.0 : +275.50, 25.59, 100.0
Protector 1.9.0 x64 : 50 ( 35, 15, 0), 85.0 : +287.27, 19.99, 100.0
Fritz 15 x64 : 50 ( 34, 16, 0), 84.0 : +291.31, 24.59, 100.0
Chiron 3 x64 : 50 ( 33, 17, 0), 83.0 : +303.79, 21.52, 100.0
iCE 3.0 v658 POP x64 : 50 ( 33, 17, 0), 83.0 : +335.41, 16.90, 100.0
2) SF 18Sep2016 BMI2 x64 3239.67 : 750 (+426,=315,-9), 77.8 %
vs. : games ( +, =, -), (%) : Diff, SD, CFS (%)
Komodo 10 x64 : 50 ( 14, 31, 5), 59.0 : +29.98, 9.97, 99.9
Houdini 4 STD B x64 : 50 ( 22, 26, 2), 70.0 : +163.86, 12.49, 100.0
Fizbo 1.8 BMI2 x64 : 50 ( 26, 23, 1), 75.0 : +190.51, 17.73, 100.0
GullChess 3.0 BMI2 x64 : 50 ( 23, 27, 0), 73.0 : +202.96, 16.77, 100.0
Fire 4 x64 : 50 ( 27, 23, 0), 77.0 : +212.59, 29.97, 100.0
Equinox 3.30 x64 : 50 ( 33, 16, 1), 82.0 : +219.15, 19.74, 100.0
Andscacs 0.872 BMI2 x64 : 50 ( 31, 19, 0), 81.0 : +232.69, 20.04, 100.0
Critter 1.6a x64 : 50 ( 26, 24, 0), 76.0 : +239.67, 31.43, 100.0
Hannibal 1.7 x64 : 50 ( 32, 18, 0), 82.0 : +254.13, 19.50, 100.0
Texel 1.06 x64 : 50 ( 29, 21, 0), 79.0 : +261.62, 29.69, 100.0
Nirvanachess 2.3 POP x64 : 50 ( 34, 16, 0), 84.0 : +265.45, 29.64, 100.0
Protector 1.9.0 x64 : 50 ( 32, 18, 0), 82.0 : +277.22, 22.33, 100.0
Fritz 15 x64 : 50 ( 31, 19, 0), 81.0 : +281.26, 29.43, 100.0
Chiron 3 x64 : 50 ( 33, 17, 0), 83.0 : +293.73, 28.91, 100.0
iCE 3.0 v658 POP x64 : 50 ( 33, 17, 0), 83.0 : +325.36, 21.36, 100.0
Regards,
Carlos
-
- Posts: 6886
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: Comparsion ... how contempt is working, nice to see!
Hi Carlos,
thanks for your stats.
Honestly, I am very chess tired so far and happy if I come from my professional work and can read the stats, so I must not create it.
In my interest is that all the available games on my site will be used from programmers and other people with interest.
Thanks again!
Have a good time ...
Best
Frank
PS: For testing Stockfish and Komodo we need more stronger opponents. But I am sure that in two years 30 engines have more as 2.900 Elo and 20 engines have more as 3.000 Elo ... in comparing to Elo calculations I am using (means if Naum 4.6 have 2.885).
thanks for your stats.
Honestly, I am very chess tired so far and happy if I come from my professional work and can read the stats, so I must not create it.
In my interest is that all the available games on my site will be used from programmers and other people with interest.
Thanks again!
Have a good time ...
Best
Frank
PS: For testing Stockfish and Komodo we need more stronger opponents. But I am sure that in two years 30 engines have more as 2.900 Elo and 20 engines have more as 3.000 Elo ... in comparing to Elo calculations I am using (means if Naum 4.6 have 2.885).