When i was moderator it was not in any way different from what happened before.Guenther wrote: ↑Sun Sep 12, 2021 2:33 pmYou'll never understand - of course he never was a moderator... and also he just 'inherited' the whole thing from Steven Schwartz.mclane wrote: ↑Sun Sep 12, 2021 1:58 pm The forum belongs to the members and it has to be democratically decided who moderates it.
It cannot be OWNED by one person. Otherwise its more hijacked then hosted.
In the moment you allow ONE person to be admin, moderator, owner of the server etc.
the free community develops into the opposite.
https://web.archive.org/web/19990224070 ... m/ccc.htmlThe posts on the Computer-Chess Club message board do not necessarily agree (nor disagree) with the opinions of Your Move Chess & Games, I.C.D. Corporation, or Computer Chess Reports, and these companies do not control, and have no say in, what is posted or how it is posted. Nor do any of these organizations have any say or control over decisions made by the moderators.Yeah, we have seen how 'democratic' it was in several periods in time, especially remembering one with you as a 'moderator',
hopefully this will never happen again.
the difference came with the technician beeing implemented by the owner as an admin.
Somebody who was not democratically elected suddenly decided in a hierarchy ABOVE the moderator decisions.
this is not democratical. its dictatorship.
if we begin new from a scratch it should be made clear that only those people who have a mandate from the community via elections are allowed to CONTROL vital functions.