The point is that the value of all chess pieces happens to be odd. And the sum of an een number of odd terms must be even. So with an even number of men you are talking about material balances worth 2 or 0. The former are usually easily won even without EGT, the latter easily drawn. It are the advantages of 1 where most of the contest is that can swing the game result.
8man Endgame Tablebases ELO gain?
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 28395
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: 8man Endgame Tablebases ELO gain?
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:53 pm
Re: 8man Endgame Tablebases ELO gain?
such hard 7-men position before conversion always were 8-men.
There is higher chance to get "winnable 1" when probing Syzygy-8.
And higher chance to miss "winnable 1" with higlhly selective pruning + LMR before 8->7 conversion
most likely 100% of this hits either easy win/loss (eval > 3 without Syzygy) or dead draw (0.00) and do not influence ELO.phhnguyen wrote:Engines started probing (tbhits > 0) very early
Such enourmous selective depth happens with extensions (checks or captures), combined with sparse LMR.
Very unlikely that this TBHits happen on position with uncertain eval like +0.7 ... +2, when assigning +150 or 0.00 will help to secure win or hold draw.
-
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2020 10:03 pm
- Full name: Daniel Infuehr
Re: 8man Endgame Tablebases ELO gain?
I dont know if this is true. I can see in taskmanager disk activity after a few moves - and i have 6 piece tablebase installed.yurikvelo wrote: ↑Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:55 pmsuch hard 7-men position before conversion always were 8-men.
There is higher chance to get "winnable 1" when probing Syzygy-8.
And higher chance to miss "winnable 1" with higlhly selective pruning + LMR before 8->7 conversion
most likely 100% of this hits either easy win/loss (eval > 3 without Syzygy) or dead draw (0.00) and do not influence ELO.phhnguyen wrote:Engines started probing (tbhits > 0) very early
Such enourmous selective depth happens with extensions (checks or captures), combined with sparse LMR.
Very unlikely that this TBHits happen on position with uncertain eval like +0.7 ... +2, when assigning +150 or 0.00 will help to secure win or hold draw.
Maybe someone can corroborate
Worlds-fastest-Bitboard-Chess-Movegenerator
Daniel Inführ - Software Developer
Daniel Inführ - Software Developer
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:53 pm
Re: 8man Endgame Tablebases ELO gain?
count is very low, 2k tbhits is nothing from 20-men FEN.dangi12012 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 10, 2021 4:10 pm I dont know if this is true. I can see in taskmanager disk activity after a few moves - and i have 6 piece tablebase installed.
Maybe someone can corroborate
reaching 6-pos with 20 pieces on board is possible only due to search extensions (combined with LMR). Extensions only cover captures and checks, to ensure that after piece trading you don't lose material. This trading can easily reach 6-men, and mostly it is evaluated correctly (close to 0.00 or >3).
Access to Syzygy won't influence your eval.
Set up position on board and make 2 runs with fixed amount of nodes or time ('go nodes 1000000000' for example)
1) with Syzygy, to reach few kilo TBHits
2) without Syzygy (clean engine restart)
depth/eval and bestmove will be the same all the time (make 10 or 20 such different positions)
Some tree leafs which got TBHits will be assigned as +150 or 0.00 rather than +4.2 or +0.4, but this won't influence cp/depth/bestmove