I think that testing contempt 150 for dragon CCRL may be a good idea

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

Chessqueen
Posts: 5685
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: I think that testing contempt 150 for dragon CCRL may be a good idea

Post by Chessqueen »

Uri Blass wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 9:28 am
Chessqueen wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 7:06 am
Uri Blass wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 6:11 am Unfortunately I am afraid that I will get all draws in 5+3 time control when I use normal setting.

CCRL got 32 draws for Stockfish15 against Dragon3 and they do not use the opening position that I guess is even going to give more draws then using some opening book.

With a single core they got 64 draws

https://ccrl.chessdom.com/ccrl/4040/cgi ... _15_64-bit

5+3 time control is something between their blitz testing and 40/15 time control.
So far I have played 7 games between Komodo Dragon Contempt = 11 Vs Stockfish 22050407_x64_avx2 at T/C 15/10 and the score is 4 draws 2 winS for Komodo Dragon and 1 win for Stockfish, So far Contempt =11 is showing a good result , this tournament will continue up to 300 games using 4 cores.
I am surprised if you get 3 wins out of 7 games.
I got only 1 win out of 10 games with a faster time control of 5+3 from the opening position.
15+10(4 cores for every engine is close to 40/15 CCRL time control when they get always draws.
And out of the 1 win that you got using Komodo Dragon 3.0 using Contempt 11, after your 10 games what was the final score?
The score is dead even at the moment after 12 games 8 draws and 2 wins for each :wink:

This is how most of the games end up drawn and they are boring long, which I have to adjust when i see the score 0.00 :roll:

[pgn][Event "Comparing=11"]
[Site "DESKTOP-OFQ3C0P"]
[Date "2022.05.31"]
[Round "12"]
[White "Stockfish_22050407_x64_avx2"]
[Black "Dragon-2.6.1-64bit-avx2 [011]"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[BlackElo "3640"]
[ECO "B84"]
[Opening "Sicilian"]
[Time "05:26:44"]
[Variation "Scheveningen, Classical, 7.Be3"]
[WhiteElo "3640"]
[TimeControl "900+10"]
[Termination "adjudication"]
[PlyCount "213"]

1. Nc3 c5 2. e4 d6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 a6 6. Be2 e6 7. Be3 Be7 8.
O-O Nbd7 9. f4 Qc7 10. Bf3 Nb6 11. Kh1 Nc4 12. Bc1 O-O 13. Nde2 Na5 14. Qe1
Nc6 15. Qg3 b5 16. e5 Ne8 17. Ne4 d5 18. Nf2 g6 19. Bd2 a5 20. Qh3 b4 21.
Ng4 Ba6 22. Rad1 a4 23. Rfe1 Kh8 24. Be3 a3 25. b3 Rc8 26. Rd2 Qd7 27. Nh6
Qc7 28. f5 Bxe2 29. Rdxe2 gxf5 30. Bh5 Ng7 31. Nxf7+ Kg8 32. Nh6+ Kh8 33.
Bf4 Nxh5 34. Qxh5 Bc5 35. g4 fxg4 36. Qxg4 Qg7 37. Rg2 Qxg4 38. Rxg4 Ne7
39. Bg5 Nf5 40. Nxf5 exf5 41. Rg2 Rce8 42. e6 f4 43. Bh6 Rg8 44. Rxg8+ Rxg8
45. Bxf4 Kg7 46. Bg3 Be7 47. Kg2 Rc8 48. Re2 Rf8 49. Re5 Rc8 50. Re2 Rf8
51. Bf2 Rf5 52. Bd4+ Kg6 53. c3 bxc3 54. Bxc3 Rf8 55. Re3 Rd8 56. Bd4 Rc8
57. Rc3 Rxc3 58. Bxc3 Kf5 59. Kf3 Kxe6 60. h3 Bd6 61. Bd2 Kd7 62. Kg4 Kc6
63. Kf3 Kb5 64. Bg5 Kb4 65. Bf6 Kb5 66. Ke3 Kc5 67. Kd2 Kb5 68. Ke2 Bc5 69.
Bg7 Bd6 70. Ba1 Kb4 71. Ke3 Bc5+ 72. Ke2 Bd6 73. Kd3 Kb5 74. Bg7 Bc5 75.
Kc3 Bd6 76. Kd4 Kc6 77. Ke3 Bc5+ 78. Ke2 Kb5 79. Kd3 Bd6 80. Bf6 Bc5 81.
Kc2 Kc6 82. Kc3 Kb5 83. Bh4 Bd6 84. Bg5 Be5+ 85. Kd3 Bb2 86. Bh6 Bf6 87.
Bf8 Bb2 88. Bh6 Bf6 89. Bc1 Be7 90. Kd4 Kc6 91. Kd3 Bd6 92. Bh6 Be7 93. Kd4
Bc5+ 94. Kd3 Be7 95. Bc1 Kb5 96. Bd2 Bc5 97. Bg5 Kc6 98. Bf6 Bb4 99. Be5
Kb5 100. Kd4 Kc6 101. Kd3 Be7 102. Bg7 Bc5 103. Bd4 Be7 104. Be5 Kb5 105.
Bf4 Bc5 106. Bg5 Bd6 107. Bd2 {User Adjudication} 1/2-1/2[/pgn]
Chessqueen
Posts: 5685
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: I think that testing contempt 150 for dragon CCRL may be a good idea

Post by Chessqueen »

Chessqueen wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 1:17 pm
Uri Blass wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 9:28 am
Chessqueen wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 7:06 am
Uri Blass wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 6:11 am Unfortunately I am afraid that I will get all draws in 5+3 time control when I use normal setting.

CCRL got 32 draws for Stockfish15 against Dragon3 and they do not use the opening position that I guess is even going to give more draws then using some opening book.

With a single core they got 64 draws

https://ccrl.chessdom.com/ccrl/4040/cgi ... _15_64-bit

5+3 time control is something between their blitz testing and 40/15 time control.
So far I have played 7 games between Komodo Dragon Contempt = 11 Vs Stockfish 22050407_x64_avx2 at T/C 15/10 and the score is 4 draws 2 winS for Komodo Dragon and 1 win for Stockfish, So far Contempt =11 is showing a good result , this tournament will continue up to 300 games using 4 cores.
I am surprised if you get 3 wins out of 7 games.
I got only 1 win out of 10 games with a faster time control of 5+3 from the opening position.
15+10(4 cores for every engine is close to 40/15 CCRL time control when they get always draws.
And out of the 1 win that you got using Komodo Dragon 3.0 using Contempt 11, after your 10 games what was the final score?
The score is dead even at the moment after 12 games 8 draws and 2 wins for each :wink:

This is how most of the games end up drawn and they are boring long, which I have to adjust when i see the score 0.00. I have observed thousands of Komodo Dagon Vs Stockfish games and with the default Contempt of 16 every time that Komodo get a small advantage of let say 0.80 to 0.90 Komodo Dragon with the default Contempt of 16 somehow stop putting pressure to Stockfish, so for a long time I had this idea that I would change Komodo Dragon to be a little bit more aggressive, and just a few days ago it occurred to me that I should probably lower the Contempt to either 12 or 11 and so far my intuition was correct; and even playing with the Black pieces it still manage to neutralize stockfish, even playing with the Black pieces [/size] :roll:

[pgn][Event "Comparing=11"]
[Site "DESKTOP-OFQ3C0P"]
[Date "2022.05.31"]
[Round "12"]
[White "Stockfish_22050407_x64_avx2"]
[Black "Dragon-2.6.1-64bit-avx2 [011]"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[BlackElo "3640"]
[ECO "B84"]
[Opening "Sicilian"]
[Time "05:26:44"]
[Variation "Scheveningen, Classical, 7.Be3"]
[WhiteElo "3640"]
[TimeControl "900+10"]
[Termination "adjudication"]
[PlyCount "213"]

1. Nc3 c5 2. e4 d6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 a6 6. Be2 e6 7. Be3 Be7 8.
O-O Nbd7 9. f4 Qc7 10. Bf3 Nb6 11. Kh1 Nc4 12. Bc1 O-O 13. Nde2 Na5 14. Qe1
Nc6 15. Qg3 b5 16. e5 Ne8 17. Ne4 d5 18. Nf2 g6 19. Bd2 a5 20. Qh3 b4 21.
Ng4 Ba6 22. Rad1 a4 23. Rfe1 Kh8 24. Be3 a3 25. b3 Rc8 26. Rd2 Qd7 27. Nh6
Qc7 28. f5 Bxe2 29. Rdxe2 gxf5 30. Bh5 Ng7 31. Nxf7+ Kg8 32. Nh6+ Kh8 33.
Bf4 Nxh5 34. Qxh5 Bc5 35. g4 fxg4 36. Qxg4 Qg7 37. Rg2 Qxg4 38. Rxg4 Ne7
39. Bg5 Nf5 40. Nxf5 exf5 41. Rg2 Rce8 42. e6 f4 43. Bh6 Rg8 44. Rxg8+ Rxg8
45. Bxf4 Kg7 46. Bg3 Be7 47. Kg2 Rc8 48. Re2 Rf8 49. Re5 Rc8 50. Re2 Rf8
51. Bf2 Rf5 52. Bd4+ Kg6 53. c3 bxc3 54. Bxc3 Rf8 55. Re3 Rd8 56. Bd4 Rc8
57. Rc3 Rxc3 58. Bxc3 Kf5 59. Kf3 Kxe6 60. h3 Bd6 61. Bd2 Kd7 62. Kg4 Kc6
63. Kf3 Kb5 64. Bg5 Kb4 65. Bf6 Kb5 66. Ke3 Kc5 67. Kd2 Kb5 68. Ke2 Bc5 69.
Bg7 Bd6 70. Ba1 Kb4 71. Ke3 Bc5+ 72. Ke2 Bd6 73. Kd3 Kb5 74. Bg7 Bc5 75.
Kc3 Bd6 76. Kd4 Kc6 77. Ke3 Bc5+ 78. Ke2 Kb5 79. Kd3 Bd6 80. Bf6 Bc5 81.
Kc2 Kc6 82. Kc3 Kb5 83. Bh4 Bd6 84. Bg5 Be5+ 85. Kd3 Bb2 86. Bh6 Bf6 87.
Bf8 Bb2 88. Bh6 Bf6 89. Bc1 Be7 90. Kd4 Kc6 91. Kd3 Bd6 92. Bh6 Be7 93. Kd4
Bc5+ 94. Kd3 Be7 95. Bc1 Kb5 96. Bd2 Bc5 97. Bg5 Kc6 98. Bf6 Bb4 99. Be5
Kb5 100. Kd4 Kc6 101. Kd3 Be7 102. Bg7 Bc5 103. Bd4 Be7 104. Be5 Kb5 105.
Bf4 Bc5 106. Bg5 Bd6 107. Bd2 {User Adjudication} 1/2-1/2[/pgn]
Uri Blass
Posts: 11124
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: I think that testing contempt 150 for dragon CCRL may be a good idea

Post by Uri Blass »

Chessqueen wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 1:17 pm
Uri Blass wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 9:28 am
Chessqueen wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 7:06 am
Uri Blass wrote: Tue May 31, 2022 6:11 am Unfortunately I am afraid that I will get all draws in 5+3 time control when I use normal setting.

CCRL got 32 draws for Stockfish15 against Dragon3 and they do not use the opening position that I guess is even going to give more draws then using some opening book.

With a single core they got 64 draws

https://ccrl.chessdom.com/ccrl/4040/cgi ... _15_64-bit

5+3 time control is something between their blitz testing and 40/15 time control.
So far I have played 7 games between Komodo Dragon Contempt = 11 Vs Stockfish 22050407_x64_avx2 at T/C 15/10 and the score is 4 draws 2 winS for Komodo Dragon and 1 win for Stockfish, So far Contempt =11 is showing a good result , this tournament will continue up to 300 games using 4 cores.
I am surprised if you get 3 wins out of 7 games.
I got only 1 win out of 10 games with a faster time control of 5+3 from the opening position.
15+10(4 cores for every engine is close to 40/15 CCRL time control when they get always draws.
And out of the 1 win that you got using Komodo Dragon 3.0 using Contempt 11, after your 10 games what was the final score?
The score is dead even at the moment after 12 games 8 draws and 2 wins for each :wink:

This is how most of the games end up drawn and they are boring long, which I have to adjust when i see the score 0.00 :roll:

[pgn][Event "Comparing=11"]
[Site "DESKTOP-OFQ3C0P"]
[Date "2022.05.31"]
[Round "12"]
[White "Stockfish_22050407_x64_avx2"]
[Black "Dragon-2.6.1-64bit-avx2 [011]"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[BlackElo "3640"]
[ECO "B84"]
[Opening "Sicilian"]
[Time "05:26:44"]
[Variation "Scheveningen, Classical, 7.Be3"]
[WhiteElo "3640"]
[TimeControl "900+10"]
[Termination "adjudication"]
[PlyCount "213"]

1. Nc3 c5 2. e4 d6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 a6 6. Be2 e6 7. Be3 Be7 8.
O-O Nbd7 9. f4 Qc7 10. Bf3 Nb6 11. Kh1 Nc4 12. Bc1 O-O 13. Nde2 Na5 14. Qe1
Nc6 15. Qg3 b5 16. e5 Ne8 17. Ne4 d5 18. Nf2 g6 19. Bd2 a5 20. Qh3 b4 21.
Ng4 Ba6 22. Rad1 a4 23. Rfe1 Kh8 24. Be3 a3 25. b3 Rc8 26. Rd2 Qd7 27. Nh6
Qc7 28. f5 Bxe2 29. Rdxe2 gxf5 30. Bh5 Ng7 31. Nxf7+ Kg8 32. Nh6+ Kh8 33.
Bf4 Nxh5 34. Qxh5 Bc5 35. g4 fxg4 36. Qxg4 Qg7 37. Rg2 Qxg4 38. Rxg4 Ne7
39. Bg5 Nf5 40. Nxf5 exf5 41. Rg2 Rce8 42. e6 f4 43. Bh6 Rg8 44. Rxg8+ Rxg8
45. Bxf4 Kg7 46. Bg3 Be7 47. Kg2 Rc8 48. Re2 Rf8 49. Re5 Rc8 50. Re2 Rf8
51. Bf2 Rf5 52. Bd4+ Kg6 53. c3 bxc3 54. Bxc3 Rf8 55. Re3 Rd8 56. Bd4 Rc8
57. Rc3 Rxc3 58. Bxc3 Kf5 59. Kf3 Kxe6 60. h3 Bd6 61. Bd2 Kd7 62. Kg4 Kc6
63. Kf3 Kb5 64. Bg5 Kb4 65. Bf6 Kb5 66. Ke3 Kc5 67. Kd2 Kb5 68. Ke2 Bc5 69.
Bg7 Bd6 70. Ba1 Kb4 71. Ke3 Bc5+ 72. Ke2 Bd6 73. Kd3 Kb5 74. Bg7 Bc5 75.
Kc3 Bd6 76. Kd4 Kc6 77. Ke3 Bc5+ 78. Ke2 Kb5 79. Kd3 Bd6 80. Bf6 Bc5 81.
Kc2 Kc6 82. Kc3 Kb5 83. Bh4 Bd6 84. Bg5 Be5+ 85. Kd3 Bb2 86. Bh6 Bf6 87.
Bf8 Bb2 88. Bh6 Bf6 89. Bc1 Be7 90. Kd4 Kc6 91. Kd3 Bd6 92. Bh6 Be7 93. Kd4
Bc5+ 94. Kd3 Be7 95. Bc1 Kb5 96. Bd2 Bc5 97. Bg5 Kc6 98. Bf6 Bb4 99. Be5
Kb5 100. Kd4 Kc6 101. Kd3 Be7 102. Bg7 Bc5 103. Bd4 Be7 104. Be5 Kb5 105.
Bf4 Bc5 106. Bg5 Bd6 107. Bd2 {User Adjudication} 1/2-1/2[/pgn]

I did not use contempt 11 but I have no reason to believe contempt 11 will score significantly different than default.

5+3 is faster than 40/15 so stockfish got one win.

I consider testing 40/15 to make it equivalent to CCRL to see if I also get 100% draws with no opening book for 4 cores.
unfortunately I will not be surprised by 100% draws and to get more interesting games I need to increase contempt for Dragon but unfortunately it makes dragon losing.

I am not sure how many nodes per second I need for equivalent time control to 40/15 CCRL
Chessqueen
Posts: 5685
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:16 am
Location: Moving
Full name: Jorge Picado

Re: I think that testing contempt 150 for dragon CCRL may be a good idea

Post by Chessqueen »

I will also start testing at T/C 40/15 with Contempt =11 to see how many draws I get after 100 games.