I wish test position best move data was in algebraic (g1f3 etc) as per uci specification. Humans can’t anyway interpret a fen without putting it through some software, so why the move field has to be in human-oriented format escapes me. From POV engine programmer g1f3 format is way easier to process.
EN-Test 2022 - new testsuite
Moderator: Ras
-
chrisw
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:28 pm
- Location: Midi-Pyrénées
- Full name: Christopher Whittington
Re: EN-Test 2022 - new testsuite
-
Eduard
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:58 am
- Location: Germany
- Full name: N.N.
Re: EN-Test 2022 - new testsuite
I have completed my test. I don't buy commercial engines, except as a complete product with a GUI.
That's why I was able to test Powerfritz 18.
Both of my engines (Solista) are based on current Stockfish code, but not only parameters have changed. However, this makes it possible to implement the latest Stockfish patches. I did that today.
----------------------------------------------
My Engine Solista Attack v3 got these patches:
Author: Michael Chaly
Date: Sun Oct 23 20:22:04 2022 +0200
Timestamp: 1666549324
Use TT moves more often in qsearch
Author: Clement
Date: Sun Oct 23 20:18:08 2022 +0200
Timestamp: 1666549088
Add RISC-V 64-bit support
Author: MinetaS
Date: Sun Oct 23 19:58:47 2022 +0200
Timestamp: 1666547927
Apply -flto-partition=one / -flto=full
----------------------------------------------
Solista Attack v3 now solves one position more than v2. My classic engine from 251022 solves 2 positions more.
Results AMD Ryzen 3900X, 20 Threads, 4 GB hash, all 3456men Syzygy, 30s:
Solista Classic 251022, Result: 111 out of 120 = 92.5%. Solista Classic.txt (ZIP)
Solista Attack v3 (default), Result: 108 out of 120 = 90.0%. Solista Attack v3.txt (ZIP)
Shashchess 25.2 GoldDigger, Result: 105 out of 120 = 87.5%. GoldDigger.txt (ZIP)
Blue Marlin 15.3a, Result: 105 out of 120 = 87.5%. BlueMarlin 15.3a.txt (ZIP)
Swordfish 15.3a, Result: 104 out of 120 = 86.6%. Swordfish 15.3a.txt (ZIP)
Corchess 3 171022, Result: 100 out of 120 = 83.3%. Corchess 3 171022.txt (ZIP)
ProteusSF-Piranha 220904, Result: 99 out of 120 = 82.5%. ProteusSF-Piranha.txt (ZIP)
Dark Sister 1.9a, Result: 99 out of 120 = 82.5%. DarkSister 1.9a.txt (ZIP)
Shashchess 25 (default), Result: 98 out of 120 = 81.6%. Shashchess 25 .txt (ZIP)
Crystal 040722, Result: 98 out of 120 = 81.6%. Crystal 040722.txt (ZIP)
BrainLearn 19, Result: 97 out of 120 = 80.8%. BrainLearn 19.txt (ZIP)
Stockfish 161022, Result: 97 out of 120 = 80.8%. Stockfish.txt (ZIP)
Eman 8.40, Result: 96 out of 120 = 80.0%. Eman 8.40.txt (ZIP)
Fat Titz 2, Result: 92 out of 120 = 76.6%. Fat Titz 2.txt (ZIP)
Cfish 250621, Result: 90 out of 120 = 75.0%. Cfish 250621.txt (ZIP)
Stockfish_FF2 150521, Result: 88 out of 120 = 73.3%. Stockfish_FF2.txt (ZIP)
RubiChess 2022 (1013), Result: 78 out of 120 = 65.0%. RubiChess.txt (ZIP)
Berserk 20220725, Result: 77 out of 120 = 64.1%. Berserk 20220725.txt (ZIP)
Koivisto 8.16, Result: 75 out of 120 = 62.5%. Koivisto 8.16.txt (ZIP)
Wasp 6.00, Result: 72 out of 120 = 60.0%. Wasp 6.00.txt (ZIP)
Powerfritz 18, Result: 69 out of 120 = 57.5%. Powerfritz 18.txt (ZIP)
Seer 2.6.0, Result: 69 out of 120 = 57.5%. Seer 2.6.0.txt (ZIP)
Fire NN 1072022, Result: 68 out of 120 = 56.6%. Fire NN 1072022.txt (ZIP)
rofChade 3.0, Result: 67 out of 120 = 55.8%. rofChade 3.0.txt (ZIP)
Rebel 15x2, Result: 66 out of 120 = 55.0%. Rebel 15x2.txt (ZIP)
Igel 3.1.0, Result: 56 out of 120 = 46.6%. Igel 3.1.0.txt (ZIP)
Textfiles on my Homepage:
https://solistachess.jimdosite.com/testing/
That's why I was able to test Powerfritz 18.
Both of my engines (Solista) are based on current Stockfish code, but not only parameters have changed. However, this makes it possible to implement the latest Stockfish patches. I did that today.
----------------------------------------------
My Engine Solista Attack v3 got these patches:
Author: Michael Chaly
Date: Sun Oct 23 20:22:04 2022 +0200
Timestamp: 1666549324
Use TT moves more often in qsearch
Author: Clement
Date: Sun Oct 23 20:18:08 2022 +0200
Timestamp: 1666549088
Add RISC-V 64-bit support
Author: MinetaS
Date: Sun Oct 23 19:58:47 2022 +0200
Timestamp: 1666547927
Apply -flto-partition=one / -flto=full
----------------------------------------------
Solista Attack v3 now solves one position more than v2. My classic engine from 251022 solves 2 positions more.
Results AMD Ryzen 3900X, 20 Threads, 4 GB hash, all 3456men Syzygy, 30s:
Solista Classic 251022, Result: 111 out of 120 = 92.5%. Solista Classic.txt (ZIP)
Solista Attack v3 (default), Result: 108 out of 120 = 90.0%. Solista Attack v3.txt (ZIP)
Shashchess 25.2 GoldDigger, Result: 105 out of 120 = 87.5%. GoldDigger.txt (ZIP)
Blue Marlin 15.3a, Result: 105 out of 120 = 87.5%. BlueMarlin 15.3a.txt (ZIP)
Swordfish 15.3a, Result: 104 out of 120 = 86.6%. Swordfish 15.3a.txt (ZIP)
Corchess 3 171022, Result: 100 out of 120 = 83.3%. Corchess 3 171022.txt (ZIP)
ProteusSF-Piranha 220904, Result: 99 out of 120 = 82.5%. ProteusSF-Piranha.txt (ZIP)
Dark Sister 1.9a, Result: 99 out of 120 = 82.5%. DarkSister 1.9a.txt (ZIP)
Shashchess 25 (default), Result: 98 out of 120 = 81.6%. Shashchess 25 .txt (ZIP)
Crystal 040722, Result: 98 out of 120 = 81.6%. Crystal 040722.txt (ZIP)
BrainLearn 19, Result: 97 out of 120 = 80.8%. BrainLearn 19.txt (ZIP)
Stockfish 161022, Result: 97 out of 120 = 80.8%. Stockfish.txt (ZIP)
Eman 8.40, Result: 96 out of 120 = 80.0%. Eman 8.40.txt (ZIP)
Fat Titz 2, Result: 92 out of 120 = 76.6%. Fat Titz 2.txt (ZIP)
Cfish 250621, Result: 90 out of 120 = 75.0%. Cfish 250621.txt (ZIP)
Stockfish_FF2 150521, Result: 88 out of 120 = 73.3%. Stockfish_FF2.txt (ZIP)
RubiChess 2022 (1013), Result: 78 out of 120 = 65.0%. RubiChess.txt (ZIP)
Berserk 20220725, Result: 77 out of 120 = 64.1%. Berserk 20220725.txt (ZIP)
Koivisto 8.16, Result: 75 out of 120 = 62.5%. Koivisto 8.16.txt (ZIP)
Wasp 6.00, Result: 72 out of 120 = 60.0%. Wasp 6.00.txt (ZIP)
Powerfritz 18, Result: 69 out of 120 = 57.5%. Powerfritz 18.txt (ZIP)
Seer 2.6.0, Result: 69 out of 120 = 57.5%. Seer 2.6.0.txt (ZIP)
Fire NN 1072022, Result: 68 out of 120 = 56.6%. Fire NN 1072022.txt (ZIP)
rofChade 3.0, Result: 67 out of 120 = 55.8%. rofChade 3.0.txt (ZIP)
Rebel 15x2, Result: 66 out of 120 = 55.0%. Rebel 15x2.txt (ZIP)
Igel 3.1.0, Result: 56 out of 120 = 46.6%. Igel 3.1.0.txt (ZIP)
Textfiles on my Homepage:
https://solistachess.jimdosite.com/testing/
-
Eduard
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:58 am
- Location: Germany
- Full name: N.N.
Re: EN-Test 2022 - new testsuite
Blue Marlin 15.4 solves now 1 position more, and Corchess 3 241022 now 2 positions more.
Blue Marlin 15.4, Result: 106 out of 120 = 88.3%. BlueMarlin 15.4.txt (ZIP)
Corchess 3 241022, Result: 102 out of 120 = 85.0%. Corchess 3 241022.txt (ZIP)
Textfiles on my Homepage.
Blue Marlin 15.4, Result: 106 out of 120 = 88.3%. BlueMarlin 15.4.txt (ZIP)
Corchess 3 241022, Result: 102 out of 120 = 85.0%. Corchess 3 241022.txt (ZIP)
Textfiles on my Homepage.
-
Eduard
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:58 am
- Location: Germany
- Full name: N.N.
Re: EN-Test 2022 - new testsuite
My friend Detti played fallowing game with my new Engine Solista Attack v3 (Second place in my test).
Position:
Detlef Uter,Solista Attack v3-a - ruleten,Stockfish 161022 1-0 0.0, 5 min, rated blitz 2022
[fen]6rk/2pbqp2/2pp1rpp/p3p1n1/2PPP1P1/1PN1PNQP/P2R4/6RK w - - 0 1[/fen]
Stockfish 161022 was blind.
Analysis by ShashChess 25.2 GoldDigger (sees only 0.00 here):
29.Nxg5 hxg5 30.dxe5 dxe5 31.Rf2 Rxf2 32.Qxf2 Rf8 33.Kh2 Kg7 34.Rf1 Bc8 35.Kg2 Rd8 36.Kg3 Rd3 37.Na4 f6 38.Nb2 Rd8 39.Kh2 Ba6 40.Na4 Bc8 41.Kg2 Rd3 42.Nb2 Rd8
= (0.00) Depth: 55/29 00:00:32 658MN, tb=859
Analysis by Blue Marlin 15.4-avx2:
29.Nxg5 hxg5 30.dxe5 dxe5 31.Rf2 Rxf2 32.Qxf2 Bc8 33.Na4 Kg7 34.Rf1 Rf8 35.Qc2 Qd6 36.Kg2 Rd8 37.Qc3 Qd2+ 38.Qxd2 Rxd2+ 39.Rf2 Rd1 40.Nc5 f6 41.Kg3 Kf7 42.Re2 Rg1+ 43.Kf3 Rd1 44.Kg2 Ke7 45.Kg3 Kd6 46.Na4 Ke7 47.Kf3 Rg1 48.Nc5 Rf1+ 49.Kg3 Kd6 50.Na4 Rg1+
+/= (0.38 ++) Depth: 51/38 00:00:32 564MN, tb=6434
Blue Marlin 15.4 need 30s to see an small advantage.
Analysis by Solista Attack v3:
29.Nxg5 hxg5 30.dxe5 dxe5 31.Rf2 Rxf2 32.Qxf2 Kg7 33.Qc2 Rf8 34.Rf1 Rd8 35.Na4 Bc8 36.Qc3 Qd6 37.Qxa5 Qd3 38.Qxe5+ Kg8 39.Kg2 Qxe3 40.Qg3 Rd2+ 41.Rf2 Rxf2+ 42.Qxf2 Qxe4+ 43.Kg1 Qd3 44.Kh2 f5 45.Nc5 Qc3 46.Qe2 Qd4 47.Nd3 fxg4 48.hxg4 Bxg4 49.Qe8+ Kh7 50.Qe7+ Kg8 51.Qe8+
+/- (1.25 ++) Depth: 42/62 00:00:25 457MN, tb=1135
After 25s on Ryzen 3900X more than +1.
I am belighted.
PGN:
[Event "5 min, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2022.10.26"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Detlef Uter, Solista Attack v3-a"]
[Black "ruleten, Stockfish 161022"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C70"]
[WhiteElo "2910"]
[BlackElo "2902"]
[Annotator "0.23;0.31"]
[PlyCount "189"]
[EventDate "2022.10.26"]
[EventType "blitz"]
[TimeControl "300"]
1. e4 {B 1} e5 {B 0} 2. Nf3 {B 0} Nc6 {B 0} 3. Bb5 {B 0} a6 {B 0} 4. Ba4 {B 0} Be7 {B 0} 5. c4 {B 0} Nf6 {B 0} 6. d3 {B 0} Bc5 {B 0} 7. O-O {B 0} d6 {B 0} 8. h3 {B 0} O-O {0.31/33 14} 9. Bxc6 {B 0} bxc6 {0.21/31 4} 10. Nc3 {B 0} Re8 {0.24/30 8} 11. Be3 {0.23/32 13 (Na4)} Bxe3 {0.24/33 18} 12. fxe3 {0.17/36 0} a5 {0.22/29 2} 13. Rc1 {0.12/35 6} h6 {0.21/31 3 (d7)} 14. b3 {0.12/29 4 (Rc2)} Nh7 {0.18/27 3} 15. Qe1 {0.19/33 1} Re6 {0.23/29 3} 16. Nh4 {0.18/34 6} Qg5 {0.21/31 0 (f6)} 17. Kh2 {0.46/31 4} Rf6 {0.24/32 0} 18. Rg1 {0.29/34 9 (Nf3)} Re6 {0.25/30 17 (d7)} 19. Rf1 {0.15/33 23 (Rh1)} Rf6 {0.25/31 11} 20. Rg1 {0.09/36 7} Re6 {0.19/30 0} 21. Rc2 {0.11/40 37 (g4)} Qd8 {0.03/31 3 (d7)} 22. g4 {0.04/35 6 (Nf5)} Bd7 {0.00/30 10} 23. Qg3 {0.00/39 0} g6 {0.17/26 2 (f8)} 24. Rf2 {0.00/33 3 (Nf3)} Rf6 {0.05/34 7} 25. Rd2 {0.00/37 0 (Rfg2)} Qe7 {0.00/33 4} 26. Kh1 {0.00/40 0 (Nf3)} Kh8 {0.00/39 4} 27. Nf3 {0.03/40 11} Rg8 {0.00/38 0} 28. d4 {0.00/38 6} Ng5 {0.00/42 0 (e8)} 29. Nxg5 {1.64/26 3} hxg5 {0.00/43 0} 30. d5 {1.56/34 6 (dxe5)} Kg7 {1.64/36 38} 31. Rh2 {2.41/36 0} Rh8 {1.54/32 2} 32. Qg2 {2.59/28 1} Rh4 {1.46/31 2} 33. Nb1 {2.61/33 5} Qf8 {2.30/34 27 (c5)} 34. Nd2 {2.68/31 6} Kg8 {2.85/33 18 (b8)} 35. Nf3 {2.94/26 3} Rh8 {2.74/26 0} 36. Nxg5 {3.21/24 3} Qh6 {2.96/26 1} 37. h4 {3.25/26 1} cxd5 {3.43/32 19} 38. cxd5 {3.59/30 0} Qxh4 {3.35/32 12 (c5)} 39. Rxh4 {3.94/27 3} Rxh4+ {3.41/28 0} 40. Nh3 {4.26/29 4} Bxg4 {4.02/28 0} 41. Qxg4 {4.54/27 5} Rxg4 {4.10/27 0} 42. Rxg4 {4.50/27 4} Rf3 {4.02/26 0} 43. Ng5 {4.51/27 5} Rxe3 {3.89/27 0} 44. Rg2 {4.75/25 3} c6 {4.46/29 9 (c3)} 45. dxc6 {5.45/25 3} Rc3 {4.67/27 0} 46. Rf2 {5.97/28 3} f5 {5.19/28 0} 47. exf5 {6.28/26 3} gxf5 {5.27/28 0} 48. Rxf5 {6.76/24 4} Rxc6 {5.51/27 0} 49. Ne4 {7.14/29 8} d5 {5.73/31 2 (a4)} 50. Nf6+ {10.24/26 9} Kf7 {6.29/32 0} 51. Nxd5+ {12.62/24 4 (Ng4+)} Ke6 {5.87/22 1} 52. Ne3 {13.03/21 0} a4 {6.65/24 3 (c1+)} 53. bxa4 {14.93/23 2 (b4)} Ra6 {6.20/36 4} 54. Kg2 {18.66/26 2 (Rf2)} Rxa4 {6.66/25 2} 55. Rf2 {18.73/25 0} Kd6 {6.87/28 1 (e4)} 56. Rc2 {142.18/49 2} e4 {7.02/27 0 (a7)} 57. Nc4+ {142.24/47 2} Ke6 {7.51/25 0} 58. Kg3 {142.25/59 2 (Kf2)} Ra7 {7.58/22 1 (a6)} 59. Kf4 {142.29/77 2} Kd5 {7.58/28 0} 60. Nb6+ {142.30/61 1 (Ke3)} Kd4 {8.13/19 1} 61. Rd2+ {142.30/63 0} Kc5 {8.25/26 1 (c3)} 62. Nd7+ {142.31/39 4} Kb4 {8.28/30 0 (c6)} 63. Kxe4 {142.33/59 10} Kc3 {10.14/33 0} 64. Ke3 {10/1 0} Kb4 {11.63/22 3} 65. Nb6 {8/1 0 (Nf6)} Rg7 {11.63/21 1} 66. Rb2+ {7/1 0} Ka3 {11.63/38 1} 67. Nc4+ {6/1 0} Ka4 {11.63/22 0} 68. Rb8 {5/1 0 (Rc2)} Rg3+ {11.63/23 0} 69. Ke2 {4/1 0 (Kd2)} Rg4 {11.64/23 0} 70. Ne3 {2/0 0 (Kd3)} Rg3 {12.38/24 4} 71. Ra8+ {1/1 0 (Kd3)} Kb4 {11.65/20 1} 72. a3+ {1/1 0 (Kd2)} Kb3 {4.89/18 0} 73. a4 {1/1 0 (Kd3)} Kb4 {9.00/20 2} 74. a5 {1/1 0 (Nd5+)} Kb5 {9.45/18 1} 75. a6 {19/1 0 (Nf5)} Rg7 {5.90/18 0} 76. Kd3 {18/0 0} Rd7+ {10.92/19 0} 77. Ke4 {17/1 0} Re7+ {14.56/18 1} 78. Kd4 {16/1 0} Rd7+ {15.06/17 0} 79. Nd5 {15/1 0} Rg7 {16.19/18 0} 80. Nc3+ {9/1 0 (Ke5)} Kb6 {16.49/17 0} 81. Ne4 {8/1 0 (Nd5+)} Rg6 {20.94/16 1} 82. Kd5 {7/1 0} Kc7 {20.88/14 0} 83. Kc5 {6/1 0} Rc6+ {24.75/15 0} 84. Kb5 {5/0 0 (Kb4)} Re6 {22.68/13 0} 85. Nc5 {4/0 0} Re2 {152.57/25 0} 86. Rg8 {3/0 0 (Rf8)} Rb2+ {152.57/21 0} 87. Ka5 {2/1 0} Kc6 {152.60/28 0} 88. a7 {2/1 0 (Rc8+)} Rb5+ {152.63/29 0} 89. Ka4 {1/1 0} Rxc5 {#8/38 0} 90. a8=Q+ {3/1 0} Kb6 {3/1 0} 91. Rg6+ {2/0 0} Kc7 {2/1 0} 92. Qa7+ {1/0 0} Kc8 {1/0 0} 93. Qxc5+ {2/1 0} Kb7 {2/0 0} 94. Qe7+ {1/0 0} Ka8 {1/0 0} 95. Rg8# {#1/1 0 (Lag: Av=0.34s, max=0.9s)} 1-0
Position:
Detlef Uter,Solista Attack v3-a - ruleten,Stockfish 161022 1-0 0.0, 5 min, rated blitz 2022
[fen]6rk/2pbqp2/2pp1rpp/p3p1n1/2PPP1P1/1PN1PNQP/P2R4/6RK w - - 0 1[/fen]
Stockfish 161022 was blind.
Analysis by ShashChess 25.2 GoldDigger (sees only 0.00 here):
29.Nxg5 hxg5 30.dxe5 dxe5 31.Rf2 Rxf2 32.Qxf2 Rf8 33.Kh2 Kg7 34.Rf1 Bc8 35.Kg2 Rd8 36.Kg3 Rd3 37.Na4 f6 38.Nb2 Rd8 39.Kh2 Ba6 40.Na4 Bc8 41.Kg2 Rd3 42.Nb2 Rd8
= (0.00) Depth: 55/29 00:00:32 658MN, tb=859
Analysis by Blue Marlin 15.4-avx2:
29.Nxg5 hxg5 30.dxe5 dxe5 31.Rf2 Rxf2 32.Qxf2 Bc8 33.Na4 Kg7 34.Rf1 Rf8 35.Qc2 Qd6 36.Kg2 Rd8 37.Qc3 Qd2+ 38.Qxd2 Rxd2+ 39.Rf2 Rd1 40.Nc5 f6 41.Kg3 Kf7 42.Re2 Rg1+ 43.Kf3 Rd1 44.Kg2 Ke7 45.Kg3 Kd6 46.Na4 Ke7 47.Kf3 Rg1 48.Nc5 Rf1+ 49.Kg3 Kd6 50.Na4 Rg1+
+/= (0.38 ++) Depth: 51/38 00:00:32 564MN, tb=6434
Blue Marlin 15.4 need 30s to see an small advantage.
Analysis by Solista Attack v3:
29.Nxg5 hxg5 30.dxe5 dxe5 31.Rf2 Rxf2 32.Qxf2 Kg7 33.Qc2 Rf8 34.Rf1 Rd8 35.Na4 Bc8 36.Qc3 Qd6 37.Qxa5 Qd3 38.Qxe5+ Kg8 39.Kg2 Qxe3 40.Qg3 Rd2+ 41.Rf2 Rxf2+ 42.Qxf2 Qxe4+ 43.Kg1 Qd3 44.Kh2 f5 45.Nc5 Qc3 46.Qe2 Qd4 47.Nd3 fxg4 48.hxg4 Bxg4 49.Qe8+ Kh7 50.Qe7+ Kg8 51.Qe8+
+/- (1.25 ++) Depth: 42/62 00:00:25 457MN, tb=1135
After 25s on Ryzen 3900X more than +1.
I am belighted.
PGN:
[Event "5 min, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2022.10.26"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Detlef Uter, Solista Attack v3-a"]
[Black "ruleten, Stockfish 161022"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C70"]
[WhiteElo "2910"]
[BlackElo "2902"]
[Annotator "0.23;0.31"]
[PlyCount "189"]
[EventDate "2022.10.26"]
[EventType "blitz"]
[TimeControl "300"]
1. e4 {B 1} e5 {B 0} 2. Nf3 {B 0} Nc6 {B 0} 3. Bb5 {B 0} a6 {B 0} 4. Ba4 {B 0} Be7 {B 0} 5. c4 {B 0} Nf6 {B 0} 6. d3 {B 0} Bc5 {B 0} 7. O-O {B 0} d6 {B 0} 8. h3 {B 0} O-O {0.31/33 14} 9. Bxc6 {B 0} bxc6 {0.21/31 4} 10. Nc3 {B 0} Re8 {0.24/30 8} 11. Be3 {0.23/32 13 (Na4)} Bxe3 {0.24/33 18} 12. fxe3 {0.17/36 0} a5 {0.22/29 2} 13. Rc1 {0.12/35 6} h6 {0.21/31 3 (d7)} 14. b3 {0.12/29 4 (Rc2)} Nh7 {0.18/27 3} 15. Qe1 {0.19/33 1} Re6 {0.23/29 3} 16. Nh4 {0.18/34 6} Qg5 {0.21/31 0 (f6)} 17. Kh2 {0.46/31 4} Rf6 {0.24/32 0} 18. Rg1 {0.29/34 9 (Nf3)} Re6 {0.25/30 17 (d7)} 19. Rf1 {0.15/33 23 (Rh1)} Rf6 {0.25/31 11} 20. Rg1 {0.09/36 7} Re6 {0.19/30 0} 21. Rc2 {0.11/40 37 (g4)} Qd8 {0.03/31 3 (d7)} 22. g4 {0.04/35 6 (Nf5)} Bd7 {0.00/30 10} 23. Qg3 {0.00/39 0} g6 {0.17/26 2 (f8)} 24. Rf2 {0.00/33 3 (Nf3)} Rf6 {0.05/34 7} 25. Rd2 {0.00/37 0 (Rfg2)} Qe7 {0.00/33 4} 26. Kh1 {0.00/40 0 (Nf3)} Kh8 {0.00/39 4} 27. Nf3 {0.03/40 11} Rg8 {0.00/38 0} 28. d4 {0.00/38 6} Ng5 {0.00/42 0 (e8)} 29. Nxg5 {1.64/26 3} hxg5 {0.00/43 0} 30. d5 {1.56/34 6 (dxe5)} Kg7 {1.64/36 38} 31. Rh2 {2.41/36 0} Rh8 {1.54/32 2} 32. Qg2 {2.59/28 1} Rh4 {1.46/31 2} 33. Nb1 {2.61/33 5} Qf8 {2.30/34 27 (c5)} 34. Nd2 {2.68/31 6} Kg8 {2.85/33 18 (b8)} 35. Nf3 {2.94/26 3} Rh8 {2.74/26 0} 36. Nxg5 {3.21/24 3} Qh6 {2.96/26 1} 37. h4 {3.25/26 1} cxd5 {3.43/32 19} 38. cxd5 {3.59/30 0} Qxh4 {3.35/32 12 (c5)} 39. Rxh4 {3.94/27 3} Rxh4+ {3.41/28 0} 40. Nh3 {4.26/29 4} Bxg4 {4.02/28 0} 41. Qxg4 {4.54/27 5} Rxg4 {4.10/27 0} 42. Rxg4 {4.50/27 4} Rf3 {4.02/26 0} 43. Ng5 {4.51/27 5} Rxe3 {3.89/27 0} 44. Rg2 {4.75/25 3} c6 {4.46/29 9 (c3)} 45. dxc6 {5.45/25 3} Rc3 {4.67/27 0} 46. Rf2 {5.97/28 3} f5 {5.19/28 0} 47. exf5 {6.28/26 3} gxf5 {5.27/28 0} 48. Rxf5 {6.76/24 4} Rxc6 {5.51/27 0} 49. Ne4 {7.14/29 8} d5 {5.73/31 2 (a4)} 50. Nf6+ {10.24/26 9} Kf7 {6.29/32 0} 51. Nxd5+ {12.62/24 4 (Ng4+)} Ke6 {5.87/22 1} 52. Ne3 {13.03/21 0} a4 {6.65/24 3 (c1+)} 53. bxa4 {14.93/23 2 (b4)} Ra6 {6.20/36 4} 54. Kg2 {18.66/26 2 (Rf2)} Rxa4 {6.66/25 2} 55. Rf2 {18.73/25 0} Kd6 {6.87/28 1 (e4)} 56. Rc2 {142.18/49 2} e4 {7.02/27 0 (a7)} 57. Nc4+ {142.24/47 2} Ke6 {7.51/25 0} 58. Kg3 {142.25/59 2 (Kf2)} Ra7 {7.58/22 1 (a6)} 59. Kf4 {142.29/77 2} Kd5 {7.58/28 0} 60. Nb6+ {142.30/61 1 (Ke3)} Kd4 {8.13/19 1} 61. Rd2+ {142.30/63 0} Kc5 {8.25/26 1 (c3)} 62. Nd7+ {142.31/39 4} Kb4 {8.28/30 0 (c6)} 63. Kxe4 {142.33/59 10} Kc3 {10.14/33 0} 64. Ke3 {10/1 0} Kb4 {11.63/22 3} 65. Nb6 {8/1 0 (Nf6)} Rg7 {11.63/21 1} 66. Rb2+ {7/1 0} Ka3 {11.63/38 1} 67. Nc4+ {6/1 0} Ka4 {11.63/22 0} 68. Rb8 {5/1 0 (Rc2)} Rg3+ {11.63/23 0} 69. Ke2 {4/1 0 (Kd2)} Rg4 {11.64/23 0} 70. Ne3 {2/0 0 (Kd3)} Rg3 {12.38/24 4} 71. Ra8+ {1/1 0 (Kd3)} Kb4 {11.65/20 1} 72. a3+ {1/1 0 (Kd2)} Kb3 {4.89/18 0} 73. a4 {1/1 0 (Kd3)} Kb4 {9.00/20 2} 74. a5 {1/1 0 (Nd5+)} Kb5 {9.45/18 1} 75. a6 {19/1 0 (Nf5)} Rg7 {5.90/18 0} 76. Kd3 {18/0 0} Rd7+ {10.92/19 0} 77. Ke4 {17/1 0} Re7+ {14.56/18 1} 78. Kd4 {16/1 0} Rd7+ {15.06/17 0} 79. Nd5 {15/1 0} Rg7 {16.19/18 0} 80. Nc3+ {9/1 0 (Ke5)} Kb6 {16.49/17 0} 81. Ne4 {8/1 0 (Nd5+)} Rg6 {20.94/16 1} 82. Kd5 {7/1 0} Kc7 {20.88/14 0} 83. Kc5 {6/1 0} Rc6+ {24.75/15 0} 84. Kb5 {5/0 0 (Kb4)} Re6 {22.68/13 0} 85. Nc5 {4/0 0} Re2 {152.57/25 0} 86. Rg8 {3/0 0 (Rf8)} Rb2+ {152.57/21 0} 87. Ka5 {2/1 0} Kc6 {152.60/28 0} 88. a7 {2/1 0 (Rc8+)} Rb5+ {152.63/29 0} 89. Ka4 {1/1 0} Rxc5 {#8/38 0} 90. a8=Q+ {3/1 0} Kb6 {3/1 0} 91. Rg6+ {2/0 0} Kc7 {2/1 0} 92. Qa7+ {1/0 0} Kc8 {1/0 0} 93. Qxc5+ {2/1 0} Kb7 {2/0 0} 94. Qe7+ {1/0 0} Ka8 {1/0 0} 95. Rg8# {#1/1 0 (Lag: Av=0.34s, max=0.9s)} 1-0
-
Eduard
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:58 am
- Location: Germany
- Full name: N.N.
Re: EN-Test 2022 - new testsuite
EN-Test 2022 under Fritz GUI, step by step:
(I was asked about it)
I use Fritz 18 for my test. The test runs automatically.
Step 1: Load Engine
Step 2: Select "Process Test Set"
Step 3: Select the database (CBH format)
Step 4: Select the time and click OK
Step 5: The test will now start automatically
GUI stops the process after the last position, and you can copy the result as text.
(I was asked about it)
I use Fritz 18 for my test. The test runs automatically.
Step 1: Load Engine
Step 2: Select "Process Test Set"
Step 3: Select the database (CBH format)
Step 4: Select the time and click OK
Step 5: The test will now start automatically
GUI stops the process after the last position, and you can copy the result as text.
-
criko
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2018 2:50 pm
Re: EN-Test 2022 - new testsuite
New game Line 0.0Eduard wrote: ↑Wed Oct 26, 2022 11:41 pm My friend Detti played fallowing game with my new Engine Solista Attack v3 (Second place in my test).
Position:
Detlef Uter,Solista Attack v3-a - ruleten,Stockfish 161022 1-0 0.0, 5 min, rated blitz 2022
[fen]6rk/2pbqp2/2pp1rpp/p3p1n1/2PPP1P1/1PN1PNQP/P2R4/6RK w - - 0 1[/fen]
Stockfish 161022 was blind.
Analysis by ShashChess 25.2 GoldDigger (sees only 0.00 here):
29.Nxg5 hxg5 30.dxe5 dxe5 31.Rf2 Rxf2 32.Qxf2 Rf8 33.Kh2 Kg7 34.Rf1 Bc8 35.Kg2 Rd8 36.Kg3 Rd3 37.Na4 f6 38.Nb2 Rd8 39.Kh2 Ba6 40.Na4 Bc8 41.Kg2 Rd3 42.Nb2 Rd8
= (0.00) Depth: 55/29 00:00:32 658MN, tb=859
Analysis by Blue Marlin 15.4-avx2:
29.Nxg5 hxg5 30.dxe5 dxe5 31.Rf2 Rxf2 32.Qxf2 Bc8 33.Na4 Kg7 34.Rf1 Rf8 35.Qc2 Qd6 36.Kg2 Rd8 37.Qc3 Qd2+ 38.Qxd2 Rxd2+ 39.Rf2 Rd1 40.Nc5 f6 41.Kg3 Kf7 42.Re2 Rg1+ 43.Kf3 Rd1 44.Kg2 Ke7 45.Kg3 Kd6 46.Na4 Ke7 47.Kf3 Rg1 48.Nc5 Rf1+ 49.Kg3 Kd6 50.Na4 Rg1+
+/= (0.38 ++) Depth: 51/38 00:00:32 564MN, tb=6434
Blue Marlin 15.4 need 30s to see an small advantage.
Analysis by Solista Attack v3:
29.Nxg5 hxg5 30.dxe5 dxe5 31.Rf2 Rxf2 32.Qxf2 Kg7 33.Qc2 Rf8 34.Rf1 Rd8 35.Na4 Bc8 36.Qc3 Qd6 37.Qxa5 Qd3 38.Qxe5+ Kg8 39.Kg2 Qxe3 40.Qg3 Rd2+ 41.Rf2 Rxf2+ 42.Qxf2 Qxe4+ 43.Kg1 Qd3 44.Kh2 f5 45.Nc5 Qc3 46.Qe2 Qd4 47.Nd3 fxg4 48.hxg4 Bxg4 49.Qe8+ Kh7 50.Qe7+ Kg8 51.Qe8+
+/- (1.25 ++) Depth: 42/62 00:00:25 457MN, tb=1135
After 25s on Ryzen 3900X more than +1.
I am belighted.
PGN:
[Event "5 min, rated"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2022.10.26"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Detlef Uter, Solista Attack v3-a"]
[Black "ruleten, Stockfish 161022"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C70"]
[WhiteElo "2910"]
[BlackElo "2902"]
[Annotator "0.23;0.31"]
[PlyCount "189"]
[EventDate "2022.10.26"]
[EventType "blitz"]
[TimeControl "300"]
1. e4 {B 1} e5 {B 0} 2. Nf3 {B 0} Nc6 {B 0} 3. Bb5 {B 0} a6 {B 0} 4. Ba4 {B 0} Be7 {B 0} 5. c4 {B 0} Nf6 {B 0} 6. d3 {B 0} Bc5 {B 0} 7. O-O {B 0} d6 {B 0} 8. h3 {B 0} O-O {0.31/33 14} 9. Bxc6 {B 0} bxc6 {0.21/31 4} 10. Nc3 {B 0} Re8 {0.24/30 8} 11. Be3 {0.23/32 13 (Na4)} Bxe3 {0.24/33 18} 12. fxe3 {0.17/36 0} a5 {0.22/29 2} 13. Rc1 {0.12/35 6} h6 {0.21/31 3 (d7)} 14. b3 {0.12/29 4 (Rc2)} Nh7 {0.18/27 3} 15. Qe1 {0.19/33 1} Re6 {0.23/29 3} 16. Nh4 {0.18/34 6} Qg5 {0.21/31 0 (f6)} 17. Kh2 {0.46/31 4} Rf6 {0.24/32 0} 18. Rg1 {0.29/34 9 (Nf3)} Re6 {0.25/30 17 (d7)} 19. Rf1 {0.15/33 23 (Rh1)} Rf6 {0.25/31 11} 20. Rg1 {0.09/36 7} Re6 {0.19/30 0} 21. Rc2 {0.11/40 37 (g4)} Qd8 {0.03/31 3 (d7)} 22. g4 {0.04/35 6 (Nf5)} Bd7 {0.00/30 10} 23. Qg3 {0.00/39 0} g6 {0.17/26 2 (f8)} 24. Rf2 {0.00/33 3 (Nf3)} Rf6 {0.05/34 7} 25. Rd2 {0.00/37 0 (Rfg2)} Qe7 {0.00/33 4} 26. Kh1 {0.00/40 0 (Nf3)} Kh8 {0.00/39 4} 27. Nf3 {0.03/40 11} Rg8 {0.00/38 0} 28. d4 {0.00/38 6} Ng5 {0.00/42 0 (e8)} 29. Nxg5 {1.64/26 3} hxg5 {0.00/43 0} 30. d5 {1.56/34 6 (dxe5)} Kg7 {1.64/36 38} 31. Rh2 {2.41/36 0} Rh8 {1.54/32 2} 32. Qg2 {2.59/28 1} Rh4 {1.46/31 2} 33. Nb1 {2.61/33 5} Qf8 {2.30/34 27 (c5)} 34. Nd2 {2.68/31 6} Kg8 {2.85/33 18 (b8)} 35. Nf3 {2.94/26 3} Rh8 {2.74/26 0} 36. Nxg5 {3.21/24 3} Qh6 {2.96/26 1} 37. h4 {3.25/26 1} cxd5 {3.43/32 19} 38. cxd5 {3.59/30 0} Qxh4 {3.35/32 12 (c5)} 39. Rxh4 {3.94/27 3} Rxh4+ {3.41/28 0} 40. Nh3 {4.26/29 4} Bxg4 {4.02/28 0} 41. Qxg4 {4.54/27 5} Rxg4 {4.10/27 0} 42. Rxg4 {4.50/27 4} Rf3 {4.02/26 0} 43. Ng5 {4.51/27 5} Rxe3 {3.89/27 0} 44. Rg2 {4.75/25 3} c6 {4.46/29 9 (c3)} 45. dxc6 {5.45/25 3} Rc3 {4.67/27 0} 46. Rf2 {5.97/28 3} f5 {5.19/28 0} 47. exf5 {6.28/26 3} gxf5 {5.27/28 0} 48. Rxf5 {6.76/24 4} Rxc6 {5.51/27 0} 49. Ne4 {7.14/29 8} d5 {5.73/31 2 (a4)} 50. Nf6+ {10.24/26 9} Kf7 {6.29/32 0} 51. Nxd5+ {12.62/24 4 (Ng4+)} Ke6 {5.87/22 1} 52. Ne3 {13.03/21 0} a4 {6.65/24 3 (c1+)} 53. bxa4 {14.93/23 2 (b4)} Ra6 {6.20/36 4} 54. Kg2 {18.66/26 2 (Rf2)} Rxa4 {6.66/25 2} 55. Rf2 {18.73/25 0} Kd6 {6.87/28 1 (e4)} 56. Rc2 {142.18/49 2} e4 {7.02/27 0 (a7)} 57. Nc4+ {142.24/47 2} Ke6 {7.51/25 0} 58. Kg3 {142.25/59 2 (Kf2)} Ra7 {7.58/22 1 (a6)} 59. Kf4 {142.29/77 2} Kd5 {7.58/28 0} 60. Nb6+ {142.30/61 1 (Ke3)} Kd4 {8.13/19 1} 61. Rd2+ {142.30/63 0} Kc5 {8.25/26 1 (c3)} 62. Nd7+ {142.31/39 4} Kb4 {8.28/30 0 (c6)} 63. Kxe4 {142.33/59 10} Kc3 {10.14/33 0} 64. Ke3 {10/1 0} Kb4 {11.63/22 3} 65. Nb6 {8/1 0 (Nf6)} Rg7 {11.63/21 1} 66. Rb2+ {7/1 0} Ka3 {11.63/38 1} 67. Nc4+ {6/1 0} Ka4 {11.63/22 0} 68. Rb8 {5/1 0 (Rc2)} Rg3+ {11.63/23 0} 69. Ke2 {4/1 0 (Kd2)} Rg4 {11.64/23 0} 70. Ne3 {2/0 0 (Kd3)} Rg3 {12.38/24 4} 71. Ra8+ {1/1 0 (Kd3)} Kb4 {11.65/20 1} 72. a3+ {1/1 0 (Kd2)} Kb3 {4.89/18 0} 73. a4 {1/1 0 (Kd3)} Kb4 {9.00/20 2} 74. a5 {1/1 0 (Nd5+)} Kb5 {9.45/18 1} 75. a6 {19/1 0 (Nf5)} Rg7 {5.90/18 0} 76. Kd3 {18/0 0} Rd7+ {10.92/19 0} 77. Ke4 {17/1 0} Re7+ {14.56/18 1} 78. Kd4 {16/1 0} Rd7+ {15.06/17 0} 79. Nd5 {15/1 0} Rg7 {16.19/18 0} 80. Nc3+ {9/1 0 (Ke5)} Kb6 {16.49/17 0} 81. Ne4 {8/1 0 (Nd5+)} Rg6 {20.94/16 1} 82. Kd5 {7/1 0} Kc7 {20.88/14 0} 83. Kc5 {6/1 0} Rc6+ {24.75/15 0} 84. Kb5 {5/0 0 (Kb4)} Re6 {22.68/13 0} 85. Nc5 {4/0 0} Re2 {152.57/25 0} 86. Rg8 {3/0 0 (Rf8)} Rb2+ {152.57/21 0} 87. Ka5 {2/1 0} Kc6 {152.60/28 0} 88. a7 {2/1 0 (Rc8+)} Rb5+ {152.63/29 0} 89. Ka4 {1/1 0} Rxc5 {#8/38 0} 90. a8=Q+ {3/1 0} Kb6 {3/1 0} 91. Rg6+ {2/0 0} Kc7 {2/1 0} 92. Qa7+ {1/0 0} Kc8 {1/0 0} 93. Qxc5+ {2/1 0} Kb7 {2/0 0} 94. Qe7+ {1/0 0} Ka8 {1/0 0} 95. Rg8# {#1/1 0 (Lag: Av=0.34s, max=0.9s)} 1-0
6rk/2pbqp2/2pp1rpp/p3p1n1/2PPP1P1/1PN1PNQP/P2R4/6RK w - - 0 1
Analysis by Hugo 1.0:
1.Nxg5 hxg5 2.d5 Kg7 3.Rh2 Rh8 4.Qg2 Rh4 5.Nb1 Qd8 6.Nd2 Qb8 7.Nf3 Rh8 8.h4 gxh4 9.g5 Rxf3 10.Qxf3 Qd8 11.c5 dxc5 12.Rf1 Qe7 13.a4 h3 14.Rhf2 Be8 15.Qg3 cxd5 16.exd5 c6 17.e4 Rf8 18.Rd2 cxd5 19.exd5 Bd7 20.d6 Qe8 21.Kh2 e4 22.Qc3+ Kg8 23.Qxc5 Qe6 24.Qd5 Qg4 25.Qe5 Re8 26.Qf6 Qe6 27.Qxe6 Rxe6 28.Rd5 e3 29.Re1 f5 30.gxf6 Rxf6 31.Re2 Kg7 32.Kg3 Rf1 33.Re5 Kf6 34.R5xe3
+- (2.22) Depth: 44/78 00:01:01 5352MN, tb=78143
White is clearly better
(, 29.10.2022)
-
Eduard
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:58 am
- Location: Germany
- Full name: N.N.
Re: EN-Test 2022 - new testsuite
Leptir 1 (my newest engine) is now #1. I don't think it gets any better. More than 112 solutions, is not feasible on my machine at only 30s.
Results AMD Ryzen 3900X, 20 Threads, 4 GB hash, all 3456men Syzygy, 30s:
Leptir 1, Result: 112 out of 120 = 93.3%. Leptir 1.txt (ZIP)
Solista Attack v3 (default), Result: 108 out of 120 = 90.0%. Solista Attack v3.txt (ZIP)
Blue Marlin 15.4, Result: 106 out of 120 = 88.3%. BlueMarlin 15.4.txt (ZIP)
Shashchess 25.2 GoldDigger, Result: 105 out of 120 = 87.5%. GoldDigger.txt (ZIP)
Swordfish 15.3a, Result: 104 out of 120 = 86.6%. Swordfish 15.3a.txt (ZIP)
Corchess 3 241022, Result: 102 out of 120 = 85.0%. Corchess 3 241022.txt (ZIP)
Stockfish dev 271022, Result: 99 out of 120 = 82.5%. Stockfish dev 271022.txt (ZIP)
ProteusSF-Piranha 220904, Result: 99 out of 120 = 82.5%. ProteusSF-Piranha.txt (ZIP)
Dark Sister 1.9a, Result: 99 out of 120 = 82.5%. DarkSister 1.9a.txt (ZIP)
Shashchess 25 (default), Result: 98 out of 120 = 81.6%. Shashchess 25 .txt (ZIP)
Crystal 040722, Result: 98 out of 120 = 81.6%. Crystal 040722.txt (ZIP)
BrainLearn 19, Result: 97 out of 120 = 80.8%. BrainLearn 19.txt (ZIP)
Eman 8.40, Result: 96 out of 120 = 80.0%. Eman 8.40.txt (ZIP)
Kookaburra 1.01, Result: 95 out of 120 = 79.1%. Kookaburra 1.01.txt (ZIP)
Fat Titz 2, Result: 92 out of 120 = 76.6%. Fat Titz 2.txt (ZIP)
Cfish 250621, Result: 90 out of 120 = 75.0%. Cfish 250621.txt (ZIP)
Stockfish_FF2 150521, Result: 88 out of 120 = 73.3%. Stockfish_FF2.txt (ZIP)
RubiChess 2022 (1013), Result: 78 out of 120 = 65.0%. RubiChess.txt (ZIP)
Berserk 20220725, Result: 77 out of 120 = 64.1%. Berserk 20220725.txt (ZIP)
Koivisto 8.16, Result: 75 out of 120 = 62.5%. Koivisto 8.16.txt (ZIP)
Wasp 6.00, Result: 72 out of 120 = 60.0%. Wasp 6.00.txt (ZIP)
Powerfritz 18, Result: 69 out of 120 = 57.5%. Powerfritz 18.txt (ZIP)
Seer 2.6.0, Result: 69 out of 120 = 57.5%. Seer 2.6.0.txt (ZIP)
Fire NN 1072022, Result: 68 out of 120 = 56.6%. Fire NN 1072022.txt (ZIP)
rofChade 3.0, Result: 67 out of 120 = 55.8%. rofChade 3.0.txt (ZIP)
Rebel 15x2, Result: 66 out of 120 = 55.0%. Rebel 15x2.txt (ZIP)
Igel 3.1.0, Result: 56 out of 120 = 46.6%. Igel 3.1.0.txt (ZIP)
Textfiles on my homepage:
https://solistachess.jimdosite.com/testing/
Results AMD Ryzen 3900X, 20 Threads, 4 GB hash, all 3456men Syzygy, 30s:
Leptir 1, Result: 112 out of 120 = 93.3%. Leptir 1.txt (ZIP)
Solista Attack v3 (default), Result: 108 out of 120 = 90.0%. Solista Attack v3.txt (ZIP)
Blue Marlin 15.4, Result: 106 out of 120 = 88.3%. BlueMarlin 15.4.txt (ZIP)
Shashchess 25.2 GoldDigger, Result: 105 out of 120 = 87.5%. GoldDigger.txt (ZIP)
Swordfish 15.3a, Result: 104 out of 120 = 86.6%. Swordfish 15.3a.txt (ZIP)
Corchess 3 241022, Result: 102 out of 120 = 85.0%. Corchess 3 241022.txt (ZIP)
Stockfish dev 271022, Result: 99 out of 120 = 82.5%. Stockfish dev 271022.txt (ZIP)
ProteusSF-Piranha 220904, Result: 99 out of 120 = 82.5%. ProteusSF-Piranha.txt (ZIP)
Dark Sister 1.9a, Result: 99 out of 120 = 82.5%. DarkSister 1.9a.txt (ZIP)
Shashchess 25 (default), Result: 98 out of 120 = 81.6%. Shashchess 25 .txt (ZIP)
Crystal 040722, Result: 98 out of 120 = 81.6%. Crystal 040722.txt (ZIP)
BrainLearn 19, Result: 97 out of 120 = 80.8%. BrainLearn 19.txt (ZIP)
Eman 8.40, Result: 96 out of 120 = 80.0%. Eman 8.40.txt (ZIP)
Kookaburra 1.01, Result: 95 out of 120 = 79.1%. Kookaburra 1.01.txt (ZIP)
Fat Titz 2, Result: 92 out of 120 = 76.6%. Fat Titz 2.txt (ZIP)
Cfish 250621, Result: 90 out of 120 = 75.0%. Cfish 250621.txt (ZIP)
Stockfish_FF2 150521, Result: 88 out of 120 = 73.3%. Stockfish_FF2.txt (ZIP)
RubiChess 2022 (1013), Result: 78 out of 120 = 65.0%. RubiChess.txt (ZIP)
Berserk 20220725, Result: 77 out of 120 = 64.1%. Berserk 20220725.txt (ZIP)
Koivisto 8.16, Result: 75 out of 120 = 62.5%. Koivisto 8.16.txt (ZIP)
Wasp 6.00, Result: 72 out of 120 = 60.0%. Wasp 6.00.txt (ZIP)
Powerfritz 18, Result: 69 out of 120 = 57.5%. Powerfritz 18.txt (ZIP)
Seer 2.6.0, Result: 69 out of 120 = 57.5%. Seer 2.6.0.txt (ZIP)
Fire NN 1072022, Result: 68 out of 120 = 56.6%. Fire NN 1072022.txt (ZIP)
rofChade 3.0, Result: 67 out of 120 = 55.8%. rofChade 3.0.txt (ZIP)
Rebel 15x2, Result: 66 out of 120 = 55.0%. Rebel 15x2.txt (ZIP)
Igel 3.1.0, Result: 56 out of 120 = 46.6%. Igel 3.1.0.txt (ZIP)
Textfiles on my homepage:
https://solistachess.jimdosite.com/testing/
-
Eduard
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:58 am
- Location: Germany
- Full name: N.N.
Re: EN-Test 2022 - new testsuite
I don't think the result here is a coincidence. The engine also plays very well on the server. Here I was at kibitzing:
By the way, all Attack Engines playing here also use my CTG book:
https://solistachess.jimdosite.com/books/
I am happy!
By the way, all Attack Engines playing here also use my CTG book:
https://solistachess.jimdosite.com/books/
I am happy!
-
Eduard
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:58 am
- Location: Germany
- Full name: N.N.
Re: EN-Test 2022 - new testsuite
Starts on 06 Nov 2022
I have now started testing with a thinking time of 60 seconds. Only the top ten engines are included in this list, and only one engine by the same author. Computer AMD Ryzen 3900X, 20 Threads, Hash 4 GB, all 3456men Syzygy. Current TOP 10 LIST:
1) Leptir 1, Result: 115 out of 120 = 95.8%. Leptir 1.txt (ZIP)
2) Crystal 5 KWK, Result: 113 out of 120 = 94.1%. Crystal 5 KWK.txt (ZIP)
3-4) Blue Marlin 15.4, Result: 107 out of 120 = 89.1%. Blue Marlin 15.4.txt (ZIP)
3-4) Corchess 3 241022, Result: 107 out of 120 = 89.1%. Corchess 3 241022.txt (ZIP)
5-6) Dark Sister 1.9a, Result: 106 out of 120 = 88.3%. Dark Sister 1.9a.txt (ZIP)
5-6) ProteusSF-Piranha 220904, Result: 106 out of 120 = 88.3%. ProteusSF-Piranha 220904.txt (ZIP)
7) Shashchess 25.3 GoldDigger, Result: 105 out of 120 = 87.5%. ShashChess 25.3GoldDigger.txt (ZIP)
8-9) Eman 8.40, Result: 101 out of 120 = 84.1%. Eman 8.40.txt (ZIP)
8-9) Stockfish dev 051122, Result: 101 out of 120 = 84.1%. Stockfish 051122.txt (ZIP)
10) Fat Titz 2, Result: 97 out of 120 = 80.8%. Fat Titz 2.txt (ZIP)
TXT files on my homepage:
https://solistachess.jimdosite.com/testing/
I have now started testing with a thinking time of 60 seconds. Only the top ten engines are included in this list, and only one engine by the same author. Computer AMD Ryzen 3900X, 20 Threads, Hash 4 GB, all 3456men Syzygy. Current TOP 10 LIST:
1) Leptir 1, Result: 115 out of 120 = 95.8%. Leptir 1.txt (ZIP)
2) Crystal 5 KWK, Result: 113 out of 120 = 94.1%. Crystal 5 KWK.txt (ZIP)
3-4) Blue Marlin 15.4, Result: 107 out of 120 = 89.1%. Blue Marlin 15.4.txt (ZIP)
3-4) Corchess 3 241022, Result: 107 out of 120 = 89.1%. Corchess 3 241022.txt (ZIP)
5-6) Dark Sister 1.9a, Result: 106 out of 120 = 88.3%. Dark Sister 1.9a.txt (ZIP)
5-6) ProteusSF-Piranha 220904, Result: 106 out of 120 = 88.3%. ProteusSF-Piranha 220904.txt (ZIP)
7) Shashchess 25.3 GoldDigger, Result: 105 out of 120 = 87.5%. ShashChess 25.3GoldDigger.txt (ZIP)
8-9) Eman 8.40, Result: 101 out of 120 = 84.1%. Eman 8.40.txt (ZIP)
8-9) Stockfish dev 051122, Result: 101 out of 120 = 84.1%. Stockfish 051122.txt (ZIP)
10) Fat Titz 2, Result: 97 out of 120 = 80.8%. Fat Titz 2.txt (ZIP)
TXT files on my homepage:
https://solistachess.jimdosite.com/testing/
-
Eduard
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 12:58 am
- Location: Germany
- Full name: N.N.
Re: EN-Test 2022 - new testsuite
I want to get rid of a few words. I didn't develop this test to put my engine in first place. Up until a few weeks ago, I didn't know of any test suite at all. It was only after I sent my engine to two friends that I found out about the ERET test and Stockfish Testsuite 2021. As for the results, I didn't even know if they were good or bad. I had to ask. I asked: is that good or bad? The answer came: Is that good? And whether!
After that I studied the positions and I didn't like some positions. That was the reason why I developed the EN-Test 2022. The reason wasn't a bad placement in other tests, because that was great. I can say with a clear conscience that the EN-Test 2022 was created without any previous engine tuning! The results are as they are, without prior tuning!
I still don't like some positions of the test. Example: castling attack (position 11). Whether White plays dxe5 or Nf3 is almost irrelevant. Also Nf3 clearly wins. However, dxe5 is better. I don't like such positions 100%, but there will never be a 100% best test. Position tests also need to be constantly improved. That's what I intend to do in 2023. But if you wait for everything to be 100% perfect, then you can wait forever.
That's why I published this test.
About my engine:
I have studied thousands of engine games from the server. Lots of games, move by move. I have studied all known and unknown openings and variants, and many killer-lines. My friend Detlef Uter has been playing with my openings book for several years, and he has played more than 100.000 5+0 server games with Ponder ON (up to 64 cores) on PlayChess in the last 2 years. Then of course I also have thousands of my own games, and thousands of MZ (also 64 cores). I manually checked every winning! That's where my books come from. I can say with a clear conscience that I have a lot of experience.
I didn't like some things I've seen at Stockfish, sorry to say, but that's the way it is. I really appreciate the Stockfish community! What is being done there is fantastic. Hundreds of new codes and parameters are tested every day. And everything is documented exactly - that's unbelievable.
However, only bullet games are played in the fish test. To get a high number, it is not possible others to test. Every Elo point is fought for. That's good.
I'm not a programmer. But in the meantime I have learned what is important and how to replace the codes.
Short Example:
Old code:
r -= ss->statScore / 13628;
New code:
r -= ss->statScore / (13628 + 4000 * (depth > 7 && depth < 19));
Substituting code (or parameters) is not a great art. I test a lot with it (also with other fish cooking codes).
That's my fun. My goal now is to tune Stockfish in such a way that it achieves the best results, both in position tests and in practical play on the server with Ponder On (not Bullet). The online games are more important.
Yesterday on the PlayChess server I kibitzing the tournament. My Engine Solista Attack v4 has played. I wasn't even there a minute before I was being accosted with "our new star programmer is here". Whatever you do, it's either wrong, you've cheated, or it's being mocked. Why goes it not different?
That's why I'm satisfied, that yesterday Solista Attack v4 won the tournament a few minutes later! Really funny.
https://solistachess.jimdosite.com/
After that I studied the positions and I didn't like some positions. That was the reason why I developed the EN-Test 2022. The reason wasn't a bad placement in other tests, because that was great. I can say with a clear conscience that the EN-Test 2022 was created without any previous engine tuning! The results are as they are, without prior tuning!
I still don't like some positions of the test. Example: castling attack (position 11). Whether White plays dxe5 or Nf3 is almost irrelevant. Also Nf3 clearly wins. However, dxe5 is better. I don't like such positions 100%, but there will never be a 100% best test. Position tests also need to be constantly improved. That's what I intend to do in 2023. But if you wait for everything to be 100% perfect, then you can wait forever.
That's why I published this test.
About my engine:
I have studied thousands of engine games from the server. Lots of games, move by move. I have studied all known and unknown openings and variants, and many killer-lines. My friend Detlef Uter has been playing with my openings book for several years, and he has played more than 100.000 5+0 server games with Ponder ON (up to 64 cores) on PlayChess in the last 2 years. Then of course I also have thousands of my own games, and thousands of MZ (also 64 cores). I manually checked every winning! That's where my books come from. I can say with a clear conscience that I have a lot of experience.
I didn't like some things I've seen at Stockfish, sorry to say, but that's the way it is. I really appreciate the Stockfish community! What is being done there is fantastic. Hundreds of new codes and parameters are tested every day. And everything is documented exactly - that's unbelievable.
However, only bullet games are played in the fish test. To get a high number, it is not possible others to test. Every Elo point is fought for. That's good.
I'm not a programmer. But in the meantime I have learned what is important and how to replace the codes.
Short Example:
Old code:
r -= ss->statScore / 13628;
New code:
r -= ss->statScore / (13628 + 4000 * (depth > 7 && depth < 19));
Substituting code (or parameters) is not a great art. I test a lot with it (also with other fish cooking codes).
That's my fun. My goal now is to tune Stockfish in such a way that it achieves the best results, both in position tests and in practical play on the server with Ponder On (not Bullet). The online games are more important.
Yesterday on the PlayChess server I kibitzing the tournament. My Engine Solista Attack v4 has played. I wasn't even there a minute before I was being accosted with "our new star programmer is here". Whatever you do, it's either wrong, you've cheated, or it's being mocked. Why goes it not different?
That's why I'm satisfied, that yesterday Solista Attack v4 won the tournament a few minutes later! Really funny.
https://solistachess.jimdosite.com/