Yet another artificial endgame puzzle …

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
Brunetti
Posts: 424
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:37 pm
Location: Milan, Italy
Full name: Alex Brunetti

Re: Yet another artificial endgame puzzle…

Post by Brunetti »

towforce wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:46 pm I might be wrong, but I think the queen can still get to a4, the basic strategy for beating the stalemate trap.
Well, as long as the King is not on f8, it seems to me that playing Qa4 is useless.

Alex
peter
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
Full name: Peter Martan

Re: Yet another artificial endgame puzzle…

Post by peter »

towforce wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:46 pm
Brunetti wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:27 pm
towforce wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 7:05 pm 3. Ba3 Bc1 (3... Bc3 4. Ke3 Bb2 5. Qd3)
And then, after 5...Bc3, oscillating between c3 and b2?

Alex
I might be wrong, but I think the queen can still get to a4, the basic strategy for beating the stalemate trap.
The study is correct, to get more sidelines than given in the .pgn from HHdb, take Huntsman, with some Backward from end of .pgn you get the DTM- output quickly and it then it shows the different ways to mate from further deviations well. SF versions with NNUE to be switched off (Huntsman automatically doesn't use it with Mate Search true) are faster in Backward too it seems, e.g. older CorChess- versions without NNUE- usage are well, using less nullmove pruning than original SF does, which helps here too. Sting of course is good also, but didn't solve from starting position so far at my short- time trials neither, don't have much hardware- time free right now.

Edit: instead of Huntsman you can take SlowChess too, it needs some Backward of course, but it can also easily keep the way to mate in hash also (32G here and 30 threads). Again move nr.3 corresponds to nr.1 of position, that Chris gave, same position, just different move- count because the original Hasek- study starts 2 moves earlier):

[d]6k1/1p3p1p/1Pb1pPpP/1pPpP1P1/1P1P4/8/3b1K2/2B2Q2 w - - 0 1

Analysis by SlowChess Blitz 2.9 avx2:

3.La3 Lc3 4.Ke3 Lb2 5.Dd3 Lc3 6.Dc2 Lb2 7.Db3 Lc1+ 8.Kf2 Kf8 9.Da4 Le3+ 10.Kf3 bxa4 11.b5 Lxd4 12.bxc6 bxc6 13.Lc1 Lxc5 14.La3 Ke8 15.Lxc5 Kd7 16.Ke3 Kc8 17.Kd4 Kb7 18.Kc3 a3 19.Kb3 a2 20.Kxa2 Ka6 21.Ka3 Kb7 22.Kb4 Kc8 23.Ld4 Kb8 24.Kc5 Kb7 25.Kd6 Ka6 26.Kxc6 Ka5 27.Kc5 Ka4 28.b7 Kb3 29.b8D+ Kc2 30.Db4 Kd3 31.De1 Kc2 32.De2+ Kb3 33.Db2+ Ka4 34.Db4#
Tiefe: 62/94 00:04:01 6804MN, tb=8146977
Weiß setzt Matt.
+- (#32)
Last edited by peter on Sun Nov 10, 2024 9:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Peter.
User avatar
towforce
Posts: 12506
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: Birmingham UK
Full name: Graham Laight

Re: Yet another artificial endgame puzzle…

Post by towforce »

Brunetti wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:56 pm
towforce wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:46 pm I might be wrong, but I think the queen can still get to a4, the basic strategy for beating the stalemate trap.
Well, as long as the King is not on f8, it seems to me that playing Qa4 is useless.

Alex

Once the queen gets to a2, the king is obliged to move to f8 immediately, or it will be too late to save himself - even if the white bishop is on a3.
Human chess is partly about tactics and strategy, but mostly about memory
peter
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
Full name: Peter Martan

Re: Yet another artificial endgame puzzle …

Post by peter »

Chris Formula wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 8:19 pm very interesting position. it looks like white can win this if black plays sub-optimal moves. however, if black continues to exploit the ideas of d7 for its king and sacrificing its black bishop, then it seems a draw.
viewtopic.php?p=971549#p971549
Peter.
peter
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
Full name: Peter Martan

Re: Yet another artificial endgame puzzle …

Post by peter »

Edit- time over, with SF 11 Backward works pretty quickly too, this time I did reset move- count to the one given in first posting also (two moves later than Hasek was starting with his study), again 32G hash and 30 threads, starting way back from latest move of .pgn of original study:

[d]6k1/1p3p1p/1Pb1pPpP/1pPpP1P1/1P1P4/8/3b1K2/2B2Q2 w - - 0 1

Analysis by Stockfish 11 64 POPCNT:

1.La3 Lc3 2.Ke3 Lb2 3.Dd3 Lc3 4.Dc2 Lb2 5.Db3 Lc1+ 6.Kf2 Kf8 7.Da4 Le3+ 8.Kf3 bxa4 9.b5 Lxd4 10.bxc6 bxc6 11.Lc1 Lxc5 12.La3 Ke8 13.Lxc5 Kd8 14.Ke3 Kc8 15.Kd4 Kb7 16.Kc3 a3 17.Kb3 a2 18.Kxa2 Ka6 19.Ka3 Kb7 20.Kb4 Kb8 21.Ld4 Kc8 22.Kc5 Kb7 23.Lb2 d4 24.Lxd4 Ka6 25.Lc3 Kb7 26.Lb2 Kb8 27.Kxc6 Kc8 28.La3 Kb8 29.Ld6+ Ka8 30.b7+ Ka7 31.b8D+ Ka6 32.Db6#
Tiefe: 92/64 00:00:20 1434MN
Weiß setzt Matt.
+- (#32)

Of course time- count is restarted with last ply backwards, hash already full. Just to show SF 11 is usable well to check sidelines, that are not in .pgn of Hasek's study shown, regards
Peter.
peter
Posts: 3410
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 7:38 am
Full name: Peter Martan

Re: Yet another artificial endgame puzzle …

Post by peter »

Sting yet did get it here started with empty hash too (8G, which is the maximum for this engine, 30 threads of 16x3.5GHz CPU):

Engine: Sting Black Hole 7 (8192 MB)
von Marek Kwiatkowski

Code: Select all

 26.00	 0:01 	+15.33--	1.Lxd2 Kf8 (2.742.750) 1818
 ...
 33.18	 0:03 	 0.00 	1.Lxd2 Kf8 2.Da1 Ke8 3.Da7 Kd7 4.Kf3 Kc8 5.Kg4 Kd7 6.Lf4 Kc8 7.Da8+ Kd7 8.Da5 Kd8 9.Kf3 Kd7 10.Ke2 Kc8 11.Le3 Kd7 12.Da7 Kc8 13.Ld2 Kd7 14.Kf2 (15.932.435) 4921
 34.11	 0:03 	+0.08++	1.Lb2 (18.894.484) 5222
 34.18	 0:05 	 0.00 	1.Lb2 Lc1 2.Lxc1 Kf8 3.La3 Ke8 4.Db1 Kd8 5.Ke1 Kd7 6.Kd1 Ke8 7.Kd2 Kf8 8.Ke1 Ke8 9.Lb2 Kd8 10.Kd2 Ke8 (36.144.032) 7121
 ...
 46.18	 0:16 	 0.00 	1.Lb2 Lc1 2.Lxc1 Kf8 3.La3 Ke8 4.Db1 Kd8 5.Ke1 Kd7 6.Kd1 Ke8 7.Kd2 Kf8 8.Ke1 Ke8 (141.307.595) 8761
  47.07	 0:25 	+0.08++	1.La3 (250.309.477) 9635
 47.18	 0:33 	 0.00 	1.La3 Lc3 2.Ke3 Lb2 3.Dd3 Lc3 4.Dc2 Lb2 5.Db3 Lc1+ 6.Kf2 Kf8 7.Da4 Le3+ 8.Kf3 bxa4 9.b5 Lxd4 10.bxc6 bxc6 11.Kf4 Lg1 12.Lb2 Lxc5 13.b7 La7 14.La3+ (335.724.786) 10159
 ...
 48.01	 1:08 	+0.73++	1.La3 (790.894.459) 11573
 48.01	 1:17 	+1.14++	1.La3 (909.862.120) 11734
 48.01	 1:30 	+1.75++	1.La3 (1.087.871.070) 12005
 48.01	 1:40 	+2.67++	1.La3 (1.218.808.222) 12107
 ...
 48.01	 2:08 	+9.16++	1.La3 (1.540.922.096) 11985
 48.01	 2:22 	+13.77++	1.La3 (1.756.892.190) 12344
 48.01	 2:43 	+20.69++	1.La3 (2.149.479.544) 13178
 ...
 48.01	 5:27 	+104.91	1.La3 (6.845.105.406) 20921
 49.18	31:20 	+46.50	1.La3 Lc3 2.Ke3 Lb2 3.Dd3 Lc3 4.Dc2 Lb2 5.Db3 Lc1+ 6.Kf2 Lb2 7.Kf3 Kf8 8.Da4 bxa4 9.b5 Lxd4 10.bxc6 bxc6 11.Kf4 Lg1 12.Lb2 Lxc5 13.La3 Ke8 14.Lxc5 (48.815.410.648) 25955
 50.01	31:23 	+46.58++	1.La3 (48.861.952.778) 25937
 ...
 51.18	35:45 	+97.37	1.La3 Lc3 2.Ke3 Lb2 3.Dd3 Lc3 4.Dc2 Lb2 5.Db3 Lc1+ 6.Kf2 Lb2 7.Kf3 Kf8 8.Da4 bxa4 9.b5 Lxd4 10.bxc6 bxc6 11.Lc1 Lxc5 12.La3 Ke8 13.Lxc5 Kd8 14.Ke3 (54.791.788.937) 25535
Have to stop that again now, output- lines show the principally right way with the Queen- sac, even if DTM isn't given, anyhow that's not a mate in x- puzzle.
Peter.
chrisw
Posts: 4638
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:28 pm
Location: Midi-Pyrénées
Full name: Christopher Whittington

Re: Yet another artificial endgame puzzle …

Post by chrisw »

If you can read x.com here’s the detailed analysis:

lech
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:02 pm

Re: Yet another artificial endgame puzzle …

Post by lech »

peter wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 11:57 pm Sting yet did get it here started with empty hash too (8G, which is the maximum for this engine, 30 threads of 16x3.5GHz CPU):
---
Have to stop that again now, output- lines show the principally right way with the Queen- sac, even if DTM isn't given, anyhow that's not a mate in x- puzzle.
Sting SF Black Hole 8 (in advanced preparation) achieves this too (1024M Hash, 1 thread, very old Pentium) without any human help. It is possible thanks to AI codes (Black Hole algorithm with skepticism and intuition). I hope this idea will enable future AI machines to land in the Hudson River.
...
info depth 48 multipv 1 score cp 28 lowerbound nodes 698894172 nps 427082 time 1636437 pv c1a3 d2c1 f1d3 c1b2 f2e3 b2c1 e3f3 c1b2 d3b3 g8f8 b3a4 b5a4 b4b5 b2d4 b5c6 b7c6 f3f4 d4g1 a3b2 g1c5 b2a3 c5a3 b6b7 a3c1 f4f3
...
You are right, when engines see and hold 8. Qa4 there is no point in waiting for more.
Maybe, I can't be friendly, but let me be useful.
User avatar
Brunetti
Posts: 424
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:37 pm
Location: Milan, Italy
Full name: Alex Brunetti

Re: Yet another artificial endgame puzzle …

Post by Brunetti »

Hello,
sorry, but I can’t find a winning maneuver. Here’s my analysis so far:

[pgn][Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "talkchess"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[Annotator "Brunetti,Alex"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "6k1/1p3p1p/1Pb1pPpP/1pPpP1P1/1P1P4/8/3b1K2/2B2Q2 w - - 0 1"]
[PlyCount "14"]
[EventDate "2024.11.10"]
[SourceDate "2024.11.10"]

1. Ba3 (1. Bb2 Be3+ 2. Kf3 Bc1 3. Qd3 Bxb2 4. Qb1 Ba3 5. Qa2 Kf8 6. Qxa3 Ke8)
1... Bc3 (1... Kf8 2. Qa1) (1... Bc3 2. Ke3 (2. Qd3 Kf8 3. Ke3 (3. Qxb5 Bxd4+
4. Kf3 Bxb5 5. Kf4 (5. c6) 5... Ke8 6. c6 Bxc6 7. b5 Bxb5) 3... Ke8 4. Qe2) (2.
Qe2 Bxd4+ $4 (2... Be1+ 3. Ke3 Bd2+ 4. Qxd2 Kf8 5. Qa2 Ke8 $11) 3. Kf1 $18) (2.
Qb1 Bb2 3. Qa2 Kf8 $11) 2... Ba1 (2... Kf8 $4 3. Qxb5 $18) (2... Bb2 3. Qd3 Bc3
4. Qc2 Bb2 5. Qb3 Bc1+ (5... Bc1+ 6. Kd3 Bb2 7. Qa2 Kf8 8. Qb3) (5... Bc3 $4 6.
Qa2 $18) 6. Kf2 (6. Kd3 Bb2 (6... Kf8) 7. Qa2 (7. Qa4 $11) 7... Kf8 8. Ke3)
6... Bb2 (6... Kf8 $4 $18 7. Qa4 $18 Be3+ $18 8. Kf3 $18 bxa4 $18) 7. Qd3 (7.
Qa4) (7. Ke3 Bc1+ (7... Kf8 $4 8. Qa4 $18) 8. Kd3 Bb2 9. Qa2 (9. Qc2 Kf8 10.
Qa4 bxa4 11. b5 Bxb5+) 9... Kf8 $11 10. Qxd5 Bxd5 11. Bxb2) 7... Bc3 8. Ke3 Bb2
(8... Kf8 9. Qxb5 $18) 9. Qb3 Bc1+ (9... Kf8 10. Qa4 $18) 10. Kd3 Bb2 11. Qa2 (
11. Qa4) (11. Kd2 Kf8 12. Qa4) 11... Kf8 12. Qb3 Ke8 13. Qa4) 3. Qd3 (3. Qxa1
Kf8 4. Bc1 Ke8 $11 5. Qa7 Kd7) (3. Qe2 Bb2) 3... Bc3 4. Qd1 (4. Qb1) (4. Ke2
Bb2 5. Ke3 (5. Qb3 Kf8 6. Qa4) 5... Bc3 6. Qc2 Kf8 (6... Bb2 7. Qb3 Kf8)) 4...
Bb2 (4... Kf8 5. Qa4 $18 Bd2+) 5. Qb3 (5. Qa4) 5... Bc1+ (5... Bc3) 6. Kd3 Bb2
7. Ke3 (7. Qc2 Kf8 $11 8. Qa4 $11 bxa4 9. b5) 7... Bc1+ 8. Ke2 Kf8 (8... Bb2 $4
9. Kf3 $18 (9. Kd3 Kf8 10. Qa4) 9... Kf8 $4 (9... Kf8 $4 10. Qa4 $18 bxa4 11.
b5 $18 Bxd4 12. bxc6 $18 bxc6 13. Kf4 $16) (9... Bc1 $18) 10. Qa4 $18 bxa4 11.
b5 $18 Bxd4 12. bxc6 $18 bxc6 13. Kf4 $18 Ke8 14. b7) 9. Qa4 bxa4 10. b5 Bxb5+)
(1... Be3+ 2. Kf3 (2. Ke2 Bc1 3. Kf3 (3. Qf3)) 2... Bc1 3. Qd3 Bb2 (3... Kf8 4.
Qxb5) (3... Kf8 4. Qxb5) 4. Qb3 Bc1 (4... Kf8 5. Qa4 bxa4 6. b5 Bxd4 7. bxc6
bxc6 8. Kf4 Bg1 9. Kg4 Bd4) 5. Qa2) 2. Ke3 (2. Qd3 Bb2 3. Qb3 Kf8 (3... Bc1 $18
) 4. Qa4 $4 (4. Qa2 Bxa3 $11) (4. Ke3 Bxa3 5. Qxa3 Ke8 $11) 4... Bxd4+ 5. Ke2
bxa4 6. b5 Bxb5+) (2. Qd1 Kf8 3. Qa4 Bxd4+ 4. Kf3 bxa4 5. b5 Bxb5 6. c6+ Ke8 7.
Kf4) 2... Ba1 (2... Bd7 3. c6 $18 Bxc6 4. Qc1 Kf8 5. Qxc3 Ke8 6. Qc5 Kd7) (2...
Kf8 3. Qxb5 $18 Bxb5 4. c6) (2... Be8 3. c6 $18) (2... Bd2+ 3. Kxd2 $18 Kh8 4.
Qa1 Kg8 5. Bb2 Kf8 6. Qa8+) (2... Bb2 3. Qd3 $18 Ba1 (3... Kf8 $4 4. Qxb5 $18)
(3... Bc1+ $4 4. Kf3 $18 Kf8 (4... Bb2 5. Qb3 $18 Kf8 $4 6. Qa4 $18 bxa4 7. b5
$18 Bxd4 8. bxc6) (4... Be3 5. Qb3 $18) (4... Bd2 5. Qb3 $18) (4... Bf4 5. Bb2
$18) (4... Bxg5 5. Bb2 $18) 5. Qxb5 $18) (3... Bc3 4. Qc2 $18 (4. Qxc3 Kf8) (4.
Qxb5 Bxb5) (4. Bb2 Kf8) (4. Bc1 Kf8 5. Qxc3 Ke8) (4. Kf3 Bb2 5. Qb3 Kf8 (5...
Bc1 $18) 6. Qa4 $18 bxa4 7. b5 Ke8 8. bxc6 Bxd4 9. cxb7 Bxe5 10. c6 Kd8 11.
Be7+) 4... Kf8 (4... Bb2 5. Qb3 $18 Ba1 (5... Kf8 6. Qa4 $18) (5... Bc3 6. Qa2
$18) (5... Bc1+ 6. Kf2 $18 Bd2 (6... Bb2 7. Kf3 $18 Kf8 8. Qa4 $18) (6... Be3+
7. Kf3 $18) (6... Kf8 7. Qa4 $18 Be3+ 8. Kf3 $18 bxa4 9. b5 $18) (6... Bf4 7.
Bc1 $18) (6... Bxg5 7. Qh3 $18) (6... Bf4 7. Bc1 $18) (6... Bxa3 7. Qxa3 $18) (
6... Bb2) 7. Qa2 $18) 6. Bb2 $18) 5. Qa4 $18 Bd2+ 6. Kf3 $18) 4. Qb3 $18 Bb2
$18 (4... Kf8 5. Qa4 $18) (4... Bc3 5. Bc1 $18) 5. Kf3 $18 (5. Kd3 $4 Kf8 6.
Ke3 (6. Qa4 $4 bxa4 $11 7. b5) 6... Ke8) 5... Kf8 $4 (5... Bc3 6. Bb2 $18) 6.
Qa4 $18) (2... Be1 3. Qe2 $18) 3. Qd3 Bc3 (3... Kf8 4. Qxb5 $18) 4. Qe2 (4. Qc2
Kf8 5. Qa2 Bb2 6. Qb3 Bc1+ 7. Ke2 Ke8) (4. Kf3 Kf8 5. Qxb5 (5. Bc1 Ke8 6. Qc2
Bb2 7. Qb3) 5... Bxb5 6. c6 Bxd4 7. Kf4 bxc6 8. b7 Ba7 $19) (4. Qb1 Bb2 5. Qa2
Kf8 6. Qb3 Ke8) (4. Qc2 Bb2 (4... Kf8 $4 5. Qa4 $18 bxa4 6. b5 $18) 5. Qb3 Bc1+
(5... Bc3 6. Bc1 $18) 6. Kd3 Bb2 7. Qa2 (7. Qd1 Bxa3 8. Qa1 Kf8 9. Qxa3 Ke8 $11
) 7... Kf8) 4... Bb2 5. Qc2 Bc1+ (5... Bc3 6. Qa2 $18) (5... Kf8 6. Qa4 $18) (
5... Bc3 6. Qa2 $18) 6. Kf3 Bxa3 (6... Bb2 7. Qb3 (7. Kg2 Kf8 $11 (7... Bc3 8.
Qa2 $18) (7... Ba1 8. Qa2 $18) 8. Qa4 bxa4 9. b5 Bxd4 $19) (7. Ke2 Kf8 8. Qa4
bxa4 9. Bxb2 $11) (7. Ke3 Bc1+ (7... Kf8 8. Qa4 $18) (7... Ba1 8. Qa2 $18) (
7... Bc3 8. Qa2 $18) 8. Ke2 Bb2 9. Qb3 (9. Qb1 Kf8 10. Qa2 Ke8 11. Qb3) 9...
Kf8 10. Kd2 Bxa3 11. Qxa3 Ke8 $11) 7... Kf8 8. Qa4 $18 bxa4 9. b5 $18) 7. Qa2 (
7. Qa4 $4 bxa4 $17) 7... Kf8 $11 *
[/pgn]
How would you improve White’s play?

Alex
chrisw
Posts: 4638
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 4:28 pm
Location: Midi-Pyrénées
Full name: Christopher Whittington

Re: Yet another artificial endgame puzzle …

Post by chrisw »

Brunetti wrote: Mon Nov 11, 2024 8:05 pm Hello,
sorry, but I can’t find a winning maneuver. Here’s my analysis so far:

[pgn][Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "talkchess"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[Annotator "Brunetti,Alex"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "6k1/1p3p1p/1Pb1pPpP/1pPpP1P1/1P1P4/8/3b1K2/2B2Q2 w - - 0 1"]
[PlyCount "14"]
[EventDate "2024.11.10"]
[SourceDate "2024.11.10"]

1. Ba3 (1. Bb2 Be3+ 2. Kf3 Bc1 3. Qd3 Bxb2 4. Qb1 Ba3 5. Qa2 Kf8 6. Qxa3 Ke8)
1... Bc3 (1... Kf8 2. Qa1) (1... Bc3 2. Ke3 (2. Qd3 Kf8 3. Ke3 (3. Qxb5 Bxd4+
4. Kf3 Bxb5 5. Kf4 (5. c6) 5... Ke8 6. c6 Bxc6 7. b5 Bxb5) 3... Ke8 4. Qe2) (2.
Qe2 Bxd4+ $4 (2... Be1+ 3. Ke3 Bd2+ 4. Qxd2 Kf8 5. Qa2 Ke8 $11) 3. Kf1 $18) (2.
Qb1 Bb2 3. Qa2 Kf8 $11) 2... Ba1 (2... Kf8 $4 3. Qxb5 $18) (2... Bb2 3. Qd3 Bc3
4. Qc2 Bb2 5. Qb3 Bc1+ (5... Bc1+ 6. Kd3 Bb2 7. Qa2 Kf8 8. Qb3) (5... Bc3 $4 6.
Qa2 $18) 6. Kf2 (6. Kd3 Bb2 (6... Kf8) 7. Qa2 (7. Qa4 $11) 7... Kf8 8. Ke3)
6... Bb2 (6... Kf8 $4 $18 7. Qa4 $18 Be3+ $18 8. Kf3 $18 bxa4 $18) 7. Qd3 (7.
Qa4) (7. Ke3 Bc1+ (7... Kf8 $4 8. Qa4 $18) 8. Kd3 Bb2 9. Qa2 (9. Qc2 Kf8 10.
Qa4 bxa4 11. b5 Bxb5+) 9... Kf8 $11 10. Qxd5 Bxd5 11. Bxb2) 7... Bc3 8. Ke3 Bb2
(8... Kf8 9. Qxb5 $18) 9. Qb3 Bc1+ (9... Kf8 10. Qa4 $18) 10. Kd3 Bb2 11. Qa2 (
11. Qa4) (11. Kd2 Kf8 12. Qa4) 11... Kf8 12. Qb3 Ke8 13. Qa4) 3. Qd3 (3. Qxa1
Kf8 4. Bc1 Ke8 $11 5. Qa7 Kd7) (3. Qe2 Bb2) 3... Bc3 4. Qd1 (4. Qb1) (4. Ke2
Bb2 5. Ke3 (5. Qb3 Kf8 6. Qa4) 5... Bc3 6. Qc2 Kf8 (6... Bb2 7. Qb3 Kf8)) 4...
Bb2 (4... Kf8 5. Qa4 $18 Bd2+) 5. Qb3 (5. Qa4) 5... Bc1+ (5... Bc3) 6. Kd3 Bb2
7. Ke3 (7. Qc2 Kf8 $11 8. Qa4 $11 bxa4 9. b5) 7... Bc1+ 8. Ke2 Kf8 (8... Bb2 $4
9. Kf3 $18 (9. Kd3 Kf8 10. Qa4) 9... Kf8 $4 (9... Kf8 $4 10. Qa4 $18 bxa4 11.
b5 $18 Bxd4 12. bxc6 $18 bxc6 13. Kf4 $16) (9... Bc1 $18) 10. Qa4 $18 bxa4 11.
b5 $18 Bxd4 12. bxc6 $18 bxc6 13. Kf4 $18 Ke8 14. b7) 9. Qa4 bxa4 10. b5 Bxb5+)
(1... Be3+ 2. Kf3 (2. Ke2 Bc1 3. Kf3 (3. Qf3)) 2... Bc1 3. Qd3 Bb2 (3... Kf8 4.
Qxb5) (3... Kf8 4. Qxb5) 4. Qb3 Bc1 (4... Kf8 5. Qa4 bxa4 6. b5 Bxd4 7. bxc6
bxc6 8. Kf4 Bg1 9. Kg4 Bd4) 5. Qa2) 2. Ke3 (2. Qd3 Bb2 3. Qb3 Kf8 (3... Bc1 $18
) 4. Qa4 $4 (4. Qa2 Bxa3 $11) (4. Ke3 Bxa3 5. Qxa3 Ke8 $11) 4... Bxd4+ 5. Ke2
bxa4 6. b5 Bxb5+) (2. Qd1 Kf8 3. Qa4 Bxd4+ 4. Kf3 bxa4 5. b5 Bxb5 6. c6+ Ke8 7.
Kf4) 2... Ba1 (2... Bd7 3. c6 $18 Bxc6 4. Qc1 Kf8 5. Qxc3 Ke8 6. Qc5 Kd7) (2...
Kf8 3. Qxb5 $18 Bxb5 4. c6) (2... Be8 3. c6 $18) (2... Bd2+ 3. Kxd2 $18 Kh8 4.
Qa1 Kg8 5. Bb2 Kf8 6. Qa8+) (2... Bb2 3. Qd3 $18 Ba1 (3... Kf8 $4 4. Qxb5 $18)
(3... Bc1+ $4 4. Kf3 $18 Kf8 (4... Bb2 5. Qb3 $18 Kf8 $4 6. Qa4 $18 bxa4 7. b5
$18 Bxd4 8. bxc6) (4... Be3 5. Qb3 $18) (4... Bd2 5. Qb3 $18) (4... Bf4 5. Bb2
$18) (4... Bxg5 5. Bb2 $18) 5. Qxb5 $18) (3... Bc3 4. Qc2 $18 (4. Qxc3 Kf8) (4.
Qxb5 Bxb5) (4. Bb2 Kf8) (4. Bc1 Kf8 5. Qxc3 Ke8) (4. Kf3 Bb2 5. Qb3 Kf8 (5...
Bc1 $18) 6. Qa4 $18 bxa4 7. b5 Ke8 8. bxc6 Bxd4 9. cxb7 Bxe5 10. c6 Kd8 11.
Be7+) 4... Kf8 (4... Bb2 5. Qb3 $18 Ba1 (5... Kf8 6. Qa4 $18) (5... Bc3 6. Qa2
$18) (5... Bc1+ 6. Kf2 $18 Bd2 (6... Bb2 7. Kf3 $18 Kf8 8. Qa4 $18) (6... Be3+
7. Kf3 $18) (6... Kf8 7. Qa4 $18 Be3+ 8. Kf3 $18 bxa4 9. b5 $18) (6... Bf4 7.
Bc1 $18) (6... Bxg5 7. Qh3 $18) (6... Bf4 7. Bc1 $18) (6... Bxa3 7. Qxa3 $18) (
6... Bb2) 7. Qa2 $18) 6. Bb2 $18) 5. Qa4 $18 Bd2+ 6. Kf3 $18) 4. Qb3 $18 Bb2
$18 (4... Kf8 5. Qa4 $18) (4... Bc3 5. Bc1 $18) 5. Kf3 $18 (5. Kd3 $4 Kf8 6.
Ke3 (6. Qa4 $4 bxa4 $11 7. b5) 6... Ke8) 5... Kf8 $4 (5... Bc3 6. Bb2 $18) 6.
Qa4 $18) (2... Be1 3. Qe2 $18) 3. Qd3 Bc3 (3... Kf8 4. Qxb5 $18) 4. Qe2 (4. Qc2
Kf8 5. Qa2 Bb2 6. Qb3 Bc1+ 7. Ke2 Ke8) (4. Kf3 Kf8 5. Qxb5 (5. Bc1 Ke8 6. Qc2
Bb2 7. Qb3) 5... Bxb5 6. c6 Bxd4 7. Kf4 bxc6 8. b7 Ba7 $19) (4. Qb1 Bb2 5. Qa2
Kf8 6. Qb3 Ke8) (4. Qc2 Bb2 (4... Kf8 $4 5. Qa4 $18 bxa4 6. b5 $18) 5. Qb3 Bc1+
(5... Bc3 6. Bc1 $18) 6. Kd3 Bb2 7. Qa2 (7. Qd1 Bxa3 8. Qa1 Kf8 9. Qxa3 Ke8 $11
) 7... Kf8) 4... Bb2 5. Qc2 Bc1+ (5... Bc3 6. Qa2 $18) (5... Kf8 6. Qa4 $18) (
5... Bc3 6. Qa2 $18) 6. Kf3 Bxa3 (6... Bb2 7. Qb3 (7. Kg2 Kf8 $11 (7... Bc3 8.
Qa2 $18) (7... Ba1 8. Qa2 $18) 8. Qa4 bxa4 9. b5 Bxd4 $19) (7. Ke2 Kf8 8. Qa4
bxa4 9. Bxb2 $11) (7. Ke3 Bc1+ (7... Kf8 8. Qa4 $18) (7... Ba1 8. Qa2 $18) (
7... Bc3 8. Qa2 $18) 8. Ke2 Bb2 9. Qb3 (9. Qb1 Kf8 10. Qa2 Ke8 11. Qb3) 9...
Kf8 10. Kd2 Bxa3 11. Qxa3 Ke8 $11) 7... Kf8 8. Qa4 $18 bxa4 9. b5 $18) 7. Qa2 (
7. Qa4 $4 bxa4 $17) 7... Kf8 $11 *
[/pgn]
How would you improve White’s play?

Alex
Go to the X.com twitter link above. All explained in consecutive tweets in glorious technicolour.