TESTING STOCKFISH DEVELOPMENT 290114 = 480 GAMES
Bench: 6875743 Timestamp: 1391014933
i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759
Time Control= 4+0
Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2x - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 20.5 - 19.5 +10/=21/-9 51.25%
Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2x - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 21.0 - 19.0 +12/=18/-10 52.50%
Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2x - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 27.5 - 12.5 +17/=21/-2 68.75%
Time Control= 2+2
Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2x - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 22.5 - 17.5 +10/=25/-5 56.25%
Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2x - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 25.0 - 15.0 +17/=16/-7 62.50%
Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2x - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 26.0 - 14.0 +14/=24/-2 65.00%
Score using 6 cores: 142,5 -97,5 = 59.37%
240 Games: http://www.mediafire.com/view/a14kotk9k ... 0games.pgn
i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages allowed
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899
Time Control: 4+0
Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2x - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 22.5 - 17.5 +11/=23/-6 56.25%
Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2x - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx4 23.0 - 17.0 +13/=20/-7 57.50%
Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2x - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob4 29.0 - 11.0 +21/=16/-3 72.50%
Time Control: 2+2
Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2x - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 22.0 - 18.0 +9/=26/-5 55.00%
Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2x - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx4 27.5 - 12.5 +18/=19/-3 68.75%
Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2x - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 29.5 - 10.5 +19/=21/-0 73.75%
Score using 4 Cores= 153.5 – 86.5= 63.96% (!!!)
240 Games:
http://www.mediafire.com/view/xzyns75q3 ... amesx4.pgn
Segmenting by Time Control:
Fixed TC = 143.5 – 96.5 = 59.79%
Incremental TC = 152.5 – 87.5 = 63.54%
Global Score= 296.0 – 184.0 = 61.67%
Against : Houdini 4.0 St. Ct0 (3227) = 54.69%; Komodo TCECr (3181) = 60.31%; Critter 1.6a (3104) = 70.00%
Average Estimated Elo Opponents = 3171
Estimated Elo Performance= 3253
By a significative margin this is a new best score in my tests so far
12 Elo points above the previous leader (Stockwood 210114 SSE4.2L = 3241) and 26 Estimated Elo Points above the best Houdini 4.0 (Standard Contempt 0 = 3227). Brilliant!.
Regards,
Tom.
Testing Stockfish 11-03-13. 480 Games.
Moderator: Ras
-
ouachita
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:33 pm
- Location: Ritz-Carlton, NYC
- Full name: Bobby Johnson
Re: Testing Stockfish 11-03-13. 480 Games.
4-Core Tournament Conditions
W7 Ultimate
BIOS Hyperthreading: disabled
GUI: DF13
Tournament: Round Robin
Time Control: 1+1
Processors: Dual E5-2687W CPU (16 physical cores)
Match Engine Threads: 4 physical cores/threads each engine
CPU Usage Avg.: ~30%
Memory: ~37%
Hashtable size: 8192 MB
PB: disabled
Opening Database: 100 Pivotal Bobby Johnson ICCF Game Positions/reversed colors.
Book Learning: disabled
Engine Book: disabled
Engine EGTB: Yes, both engines.
Non-default Engine Parameters: SF, No; H, Yes.
H4ProB v. 290114 64 SSE4.2, 1m+1s
Versus Tom's, this match used shorter TC, both used TB, and tweaked H engine parameters.
W7 Ultimate
BIOS Hyperthreading: disabled
GUI: DF13
Tournament: Round Robin
Time Control: 1+1
Processors: Dual E5-2687W CPU (16 physical cores)
Match Engine Threads: 4 physical cores/threads each engine
CPU Usage Avg.: ~30%
Memory: ~37%
Hashtable size: 8192 MB
PB: disabled
Opening Database: 100 Pivotal Bobby Johnson ICCF Game Positions/reversed colors.
Book Learning: disabled
Engine Book: disabled
Engine EGTB: Yes, both engines.
Non-default Engine Parameters: SF, No; H, Yes.
H4ProB v. 290114 64 SSE4.2, 1m+1s
Code: Select all
1 Houdini 4 Pro x64B +14 +52/=104/-44 52.00% 104.0/200
2 Stockfish 290114 64 SSE4.2 -14 +44/=104/-52 48.00% 96.0/200
SIM, PhD, MBA, PE
-
Tomcass
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:09 pm
Re: Testing Stockfish 11-03-13. 480 Games.
Thanks for this nice match, Bobby. In fact Houdini 4.0 is still a very hard opponent at short time control.
In the settings you used for this match there is one which IMHO is not optimal : The Hashtable size of 8192 Mb is too big for a time control of 1+1. I would suggest you to set no more than 1024 Mb hashtable for short Time Control tests. In fact I use 256 and 512 for my 4 cores and 6 cores computers, with longer Time Controls.
Regards,
Tom.
In the settings you used for this match there is one which IMHO is not optimal : The Hashtable size of 8192 Mb is too big for a time control of 1+1. I would suggest you to set no more than 1024 Mb hashtable for short Time Control tests. In fact I use 256 and 512 for my 4 cores and 6 cores computers, with longer Time Controls.
Regards,
Tom.
-
ouachita
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:33 pm
- Location: Ritz-Carlton, NYC
- Full name: Bobby Johnson
Re: Testing Stockfish 11-03-13. 480 Games.
When I use 16 cores I always use 8192 because it's fastest. However, I used 4 cores and should have used 512mb. thxTomcass wrote:The Hashtable size of 8192 Mb is too big for a time control of 1+1.Regards,Tom.
SIM, PhD, MBA, PE
-
Tomcass
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:09 pm
Re: Testing Stockfish 11-03-13. 480 Games.
TESTING STOCKFISH ROCKWOOD COMPILE 290114 = 480 GAMES.
i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages allowed.
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759
Time Control= 4+0
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 23.5 - 16.5 +13/=21/-6 58.75%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 24.5 - 15.5 +14/=21/-5 61.25%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6 25.0 - 15.0 +16/=18/-6 62.50%
Time Control= 2+2
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 23.0 - 17.0 +13/=20/-7 57.50%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 23.5 - 16.5 +13/=21/-6 58.75%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6 27.0 - 13.0 +17/=20/-3 67.50%
240 Games = http://www.mediafire.com/view/sblm3dz6m ... 0games.pgn
Score using 6 Cores= 141.5 – 98.5 = 58.96%
i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages allowed
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899
Time Control = 4+0
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2X - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 23.0 - 17.0 +13/=20/-7 57.50%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2X - Komodo TCECr 64-bit 23.0 - 17.0 +13/=20/-7 57.50%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2X - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob 23.0 - 17.0 +11/=24/-5 57.50%
Time Control= 2+2
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2X - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 23.0 - 17.0 +8/=30/-2 57.50%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2X - Komodo TCECr 64-bit 25.5 - 14.5 +15/=21/-4 63.75%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2X - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob 28.0 - 12.0 +18/=20/-2 70.00%
240 Games=
http://www.mediafire.com/view/6w6qq232t ... amesx4.pgn
Score using 4 Cores= 145.5 – 94.5 = 60.62%
Segmenting by Time Control:
Fixed TC = 142.0 – 98.0 = 59.17%
Incremental TC = 150.0 – 90.0 = 62.50%
Global Score= 292.0 – 188.0 = 60.83%
Against : Houdini 4.0 St. Ct0 (3233) = 57.81% ; Komodo TCECr (3178) 60.31% = ; Critter 1.6a (3093) = 64.37%
Average Estimated Elo Opponents = 3171
Estimated Elo Performance= 3247
This is the second best score ever in my tests. I think that this test confirms that a unusualy big step ahead has happened with this SF compile. Or perhaps there is some statistical noise?. Who knows!.
Let’s test Ipman’s compile for this magnificient 290114 Stockfish.
Regards,
Tom.
i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages allowed.
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759
Time Control= 4+0
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 23.5 - 16.5 +13/=21/-6 58.75%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 24.5 - 15.5 +14/=21/-5 61.25%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6 25.0 - 15.0 +16/=18/-6 62.50%
Time Control= 2+2
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 23.0 - 17.0 +13/=20/-7 57.50%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 23.5 - 16.5 +13/=21/-6 58.75%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6 27.0 - 13.0 +17/=20/-3 67.50%
240 Games = http://www.mediafire.com/view/sblm3dz6m ... 0games.pgn
Score using 6 Cores= 141.5 – 98.5 = 58.96%
i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages allowed
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899
Time Control = 4+0
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2X - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 23.0 - 17.0 +13/=20/-7 57.50%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2X - Komodo TCECr 64-bit 23.0 - 17.0 +13/=20/-7 57.50%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2X - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob 23.0 - 17.0 +11/=24/-5 57.50%
Time Control= 2+2
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2X - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 23.0 - 17.0 +8/=30/-2 57.50%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2X - Komodo TCECr 64-bit 25.5 - 14.5 +15/=21/-4 63.75%
StockfishRW290114 64 SSE4.2X - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob 28.0 - 12.0 +18/=20/-2 70.00%
240 Games=
http://www.mediafire.com/view/6w6qq232t ... amesx4.pgn
Score using 4 Cores= 145.5 – 94.5 = 60.62%
Segmenting by Time Control:
Fixed TC = 142.0 – 98.0 = 59.17%
Incremental TC = 150.0 – 90.0 = 62.50%
Global Score= 292.0 – 188.0 = 60.83%
Against : Houdini 4.0 St. Ct0 (3233) = 57.81% ; Komodo TCECr (3178) 60.31% = ; Critter 1.6a (3093) = 64.37%
Average Estimated Elo Opponents = 3171
Estimated Elo Performance= 3247
This is the second best score ever in my tests. I think that this test confirms that a unusualy big step ahead has happened with this SF compile. Or perhaps there is some statistical noise?. Who knows!.
Let’s test Ipman’s compile for this magnificient 290114 Stockfish.
Regards,
Tom.
-
Tomcass
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:09 pm
Re: Testing Stockfish 11-03-13. 480 Games.
TESTING STOCKFISH IPMAN COMPILE 290114 IP = 480 GAMES.
i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages allowed.
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759
Time Control= 4+0
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 25.0 - 15.0 +14/=22/-4 62.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 23.0 - 17.0 +11/=24/-5 57.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_ 28.5 - 11.5 +18/=21/-1 71.25%
Time Control= 2+2
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 25.0 - 15.0 +12/=26/-2 62.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 27.0 - 13.0 +19/=16/-5 67.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6 28.5 - 11.5 +19/=19/-2 71.25%
240 Games =
http://www.mediafire.com/view/zngztbstt ... 0games.pgn
Score using 6 Cores= 157.0 – 83.0 = 65.42%
i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages allowed
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899
Time Control = 4+0
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 22.5 - 17.5 +9/=27/-4 56.25%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx4 26.0 - 14.0 +16/=20/-4 65.00%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob 24.5 - 15.5 +12/=25/-3 61.25%
Time Control= 2+2
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 22.0 - 18.0 +9/=26/-5 55.00%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bit 25.0 - 15.0 +14/=22/-4 62.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob 25.5 - 14.5 +14/=23/-3 63.75%
240 Games=
http://www.mediafire.com/view/tcw1d56mt ... amesx4.pgn
Score using 4 Cores= 145.5 – 94.5 = 60.62%
Segmenting by Time Control:
Fixed TC = 149.5 – 90.5 = 62.29%
Incremental TC = 153.0 – 87.0 = 63.75%
Global Score= 302.5 – 177.5 = 63.02%
Against : Houdini 4.0 St. Ct0 (3227) = 59.06% ; Komodo TCECr (3181) = 63.12% ; Critter 1.6a (3104) = 66.87%
Average Estimated Elo Opponents = 3171
Estimated Elo Performance= 3261
This is a clear new best score so far in my tests.
After my latest three tests I have no doubt that Stockfish has made a big step ahead with this extremely strong 290114 development engine.
Regards,
Tom.
i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages allowed.
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759
Time Control= 4+0
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 25.0 - 15.0 +14/=22/-4 62.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 23.0 - 17.0 +11/=24/-5 57.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_ 28.5 - 11.5 +18/=21/-1 71.25%
Time Control= 2+2
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 25.0 - 15.0 +12/=26/-2 62.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 27.0 - 13.0 +19/=16/-5 67.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6 28.5 - 11.5 +19/=19/-2 71.25%
240 Games =
http://www.mediafire.com/view/zngztbstt ... 0games.pgn
Score using 6 Cores= 157.0 – 83.0 = 65.42%
i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages allowed
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899
Time Control = 4+0
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 22.5 - 17.5 +9/=27/-4 56.25%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx4 26.0 - 14.0 +16/=20/-4 65.00%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob 24.5 - 15.5 +12/=25/-3 61.25%
Time Control= 2+2
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 22.0 - 18.0 +9/=26/-5 55.00%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bit 25.0 - 15.0 +14/=22/-4 62.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob 25.5 - 14.5 +14/=23/-3 63.75%
240 Games=
http://www.mediafire.com/view/tcw1d56mt ... amesx4.pgn
Score using 4 Cores= 145.5 – 94.5 = 60.62%
Segmenting by Time Control:
Fixed TC = 149.5 – 90.5 = 62.29%
Incremental TC = 153.0 – 87.0 = 63.75%
Global Score= 302.5 – 177.5 = 63.02%
Against : Houdini 4.0 St. Ct0 (3227) = 59.06% ; Komodo TCECr (3181) = 63.12% ; Critter 1.6a (3104) = 66.87%
Average Estimated Elo Opponents = 3171
Estimated Elo Performance= 3261
This is a clear new best score so far in my tests.
After my latest three tests I have no doubt that Stockfish has made a big step ahead with this extremely strong 290114 development engine.
Regards,
Tom.
-
mwyoung
- Posts: 2727
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:00 pm
Re: Testing Stockfish 11-03-13. 480 Games.
My testing shows the same with this version of Stockfish. That is why I wanted to test this version at long time controls.Tomcass wrote:TESTING STOCKFISH IPMAN COMPILE 290114 IP = 480 GAMES.
i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages allowed.
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759
Time Control= 4+0
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 25.0 - 15.0 +14/=22/-4 62.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 23.0 - 17.0 +11/=24/-5 57.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_ 28.5 - 11.5 +18/=21/-1 71.25%
Time Control= 2+2
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 25.0 - 15.0 +12/=26/-2 62.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 27.0 - 13.0 +19/=16/-5 67.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6 28.5 - 11.5 +19/=19/-2 71.25%
240 Games =
http://www.mediafire.com/view/zngztbstt ... 0games.pgn
Score using 6 Cores= 157.0 – 83.0 = 65.42%
i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Large Pages allowed
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899
Time Control = 4+0
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 22.5 - 17.5 +9/=27/-4 56.25%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx4 26.0 - 14.0 +16/=20/-4 65.00%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob 24.5 - 15.5 +12/=25/-3 61.25%
Time Control= 2+2
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 22.0 - 18.0 +9/=26/-5 55.00%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bit 25.0 - 15.0 +14/=22/-4 62.50%
Stockfish 290114IP 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob 25.5 - 14.5 +14/=23/-3 63.75%
240 Games=
http://www.mediafire.com/view/tcw1d56mt ... amesx4.pgn
Score using 4 Cores= 145.5 – 94.5 = 60.62%
Segmenting by Time Control:
Fixed TC = 149.5 – 90.5 = 62.29%
Incremental TC = 153.0 – 87.0 = 63.75%
Global Score= 302.5 – 177.5 = 63.02%
Against : Houdini 4.0 St. Ct0 (3227) = 59.06% ; Komodo TCECr (3181) = 63.12% ; Critter 1.6a (3104) = 66.87%
Average Estimated Elo Opponents = 3171
Estimated Elo Performance= 3261
This is a clear new best score so far in my tests.
After my latest three tests I have no doubt that Stockfish has made a big step ahead with this extremely strong 290114 development engine.
Regards,
Tom.
Thanks you for the results.
"The worst thing that can happen to a forum is a running wild attacking moderator(HGM) who is not corrected by the community." - Ed Schröder
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
But my words like silent raindrops fell. And echoed in the wells of silence.
-
Tomcass
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:09 pm
Re: Testing Stockfish 11-03-13. 480 Games.
Hi Mark, thanks for your comments and for your tests at long time controls. I follow them very carefully.
Kind regards,
Tom.
Kind regards,
Tom.
-
Tomcass
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:09 pm
Re: Testing Stockfish 11-03-13. 480 Games.
TESTING STOCKFISH DEVELOPMENT 030214 = 480 GAMES
Bench: 6875743 Timestamp: 1391459834
i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759
Time Control= 4+0
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 21.0 - 19.0 +8/=26/-6 52.50%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 23.0 - 17.0 +13/=20/-7 57.50%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 26.0 - 14.0 +18/=16/-6 65.00%
Time Control= 2+2
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 18.0 - 22.0 +8/=20/-12 45.00%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 22.5 - 17.5 +10/=25/-5 56.25%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 28.0 - 12.0 +16/=24/-0 70.00%
Score using 6 cores: 138.5 – 101.5 = 57.71%
240 Games: http://www.mediafire.com/view/99bmjh418 ... 0games.pgn
i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899
Time Control: 4+0
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2x - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 16.5 - 23.5 +6/=21/-13 41.25%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2x - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx4 22.0 - 18.0 +12/=20/-8 55.00%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2x - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob 27.0 - 13.0 +19/=16/-5 67.50%
Time Control: 2+2
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2x - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 22.5 - 17.5 +13/=19/-8 56.25%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2x - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx4 24.5 - 15.5 +13/=23/-4 61.25%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2x - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 28.0 - 12.0 +20/=16/-4 70.00%
Score using 4 Cores= 140.5 – 99.5= 58.54%
240 Games:
http://www.mediafire.com/view/0fzzajzxw ... amesx4.pgn
Segmenting by Time Control:
Fixed TC = 135.5 – 104.5 = 56.46%
Incremental TC = 143.5 – 96.5 = 59.79%
Global Score= 279.0 – 201.0 = 58.12%
Against : Houdini 4.0 St. Ct0 (3227) = 48.75 %; Komodo TCECr (3181) = 57.50 %; Critter 1.6a (3104) = 68.12%
Average Estimated Elo Opponents = 3171
Estimated Elo Performance= 3228
Not a brilliant performance this time. SF 030214 has performed around 25 Elo points below the best Development Stockfish (290114 = 3253).
Regards,
Tom.
Bench: 6875743 Timestamp: 1391459834
i7 980 3.33 Ghz.
6 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Hash 512
Relative Speed: 28.66
Knodes per second: 13.759
Time Control= 4+0
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 21.0 - 19.0 +8/=26/-6 52.50%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 23.0 - 17.0 +13/=20/-7 57.50%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 26.0 - 14.0 +18/=16/-6 65.00%
Time Control= 2+2
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2L - Houdini 4 x64_st_X6_CT0 18.0 - 22.0 +8/=20/-12 45.00%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2L - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx6 22.5 - 17.5 +10/=25/-5 56.25%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2L - Critter 1.6a 64-bitX6_NOB 28.0 - 12.0 +16/=24/-0 70.00%
Score using 6 cores: 138.5 – 101.5 = 57.71%
240 Games: http://www.mediafire.com/view/99bmjh418 ... 0games.pgn
i7 975 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores
Ponder: Off.
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012c
No tablebases. No RTB used.
Hash 256
Relative Speed: 20.62
Knodes per second: 9.899
Time Control: 4+0
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2x - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 16.5 - 23.5 +6/=21/-13 41.25%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2x - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx4 22.0 - 18.0 +12/=20/-8 55.00%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2x - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob 27.0 - 13.0 +19/=16/-5 67.50%
Time Control: 2+2
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2x - Houdini 4 x64xCT0 22.5 - 17.5 +13/=19/-8 56.25%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2x - Komodo TCECr 64-bitx4 24.5 - 15.5 +13/=23/-4 61.25%
Stockfish 030214 64 SSE4.2x - Critter 1.6a 64-bitnob_4 28.0 - 12.0 +20/=16/-4 70.00%
Score using 4 Cores= 140.5 – 99.5= 58.54%
240 Games:
http://www.mediafire.com/view/0fzzajzxw ... amesx4.pgn
Segmenting by Time Control:
Fixed TC = 135.5 – 104.5 = 56.46%
Incremental TC = 143.5 – 96.5 = 59.79%
Global Score= 279.0 – 201.0 = 58.12%
Against : Houdini 4.0 St. Ct0 (3227) = 48.75 %; Komodo TCECr (3181) = 57.50 %; Critter 1.6a (3104) = 68.12%
Average Estimated Elo Opponents = 3171
Estimated Elo Performance= 3228
Not a brilliant performance this time. SF 030214 has performed around 25 Elo points below the best Development Stockfish (290114 = 3253).
Regards,
Tom.
-
Tomcass
- Posts: 786
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:09 pm
Re: Testing Stockfish 11-03-13. 480 Games.
Re-reading my post I realize that my comment has not been fair with Stockfish 030214. I said: The score has not been so brilliant. I should have added: ... just at the best Houdini 4.0 level!!.
Regards,
Tom.
Regards,
Tom.