Moderator: Ras
Hey Eduard, have you checked your PM? You can get there your personalized "toy" with all the UCI-options who can tweak as promised. This is the original code with additional options. This is just a follow-up if you received it!PS: Is it possible to compile my Setting as "µ"-Setting by Eduard Nemeth?
I cannot see here a BUG on my Core 2 Duo 2.66 GHz, and with my own Settings (e2) under the Shredder 10.1 GUI:Jouni wrote:After 200 blitz games I got EXACTLY same rating for 1.4 beta and 1.4.1SE.
But I quess 1.4.1 is better with longer time control? Note there can be a bug in Toga, see Rybka forum:
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforu ... id=3229#fp
Jouni
I think Eduard is still reading the forum in thread view so he may have missed your reply Denis. Curious what you did with the Toga King Safety Option?Denis P. Mendoza wrote:Eduard quote:Hey Eduard, have you checked your PM? You can get there your personalized "toy" with all the UCI-options who can tweak as promised. This is the original code with additional options. This is just a follow-up if you received it!PS: Is it possible to compile my Setting as "µ"-Setting by Eduard Nemeth?
I do remember that we had a discussion about the same issue quite a way back with Toga 1.2.1a I believe but I can't remember details or what the conclusion was. I vaguely remember I tried to repeat games with the same settings and openings but there were often some -inexplainable?- differences from the same starting positions. It may have been just timing effects or some bugs still, so that makes it a bit more difficult to check the truth. But I'm not buying that Toga King Safety is helping much in games on Playchess when there is no difference in Analysis mode. In Toga 1.2.1a the option still worked maybe the discussion was about 1.3.4 
It's what we are here for . Thanks Denis! I don't have your e-mail, I think I will just place the sources for the Beta 3 in the original thread in the CCRL forum, it would be great if you could make some compiles also for multithreaded versions of it! I will add the GPL license, maybe you could add it in a zip file so the exes can be distributed as a GPL package together? I have not tested it much but I can't do tests on a Dual or higher anyway. It is still a Beta but I think some of the modifications at least should work! Not that I made a complete new version, it is still a lot of trial and error, and especially the latterDenis P. Mendoza wrote:Eelco, you maybe right as there's still no response from Eduard. But the one I did for him does not change the TKSM - disabled. It's still the original code with only about 14 additional UCI-options for Razoring depth, Razoring Margin, more material weight options, etc..as he likes to tweak parameters. Maybe I'll test adding more eval UCI-options like in Toga-per of Jim, for variety and testing purposes only.
Just send me something to do, if you want a compile for your mods. Even Master Jim could do a better compile for you