Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
The irony is that Rolf always presents the facts based on logical grounds,but in this case Vasik's word is the ultimate verdict....well,at least for him....
Dr.D
Not if you've read and understood the thoughtful analysis in my answer to Slobo. Until now nobody else than me has understood that it cant be the question what you all see as one because we simply are in a crime case. And on thing for sure. The CCC is backing up anonymous thieves, potential terrorists who want to destroy the whole computerchess sports. Please do come back to your senses. Do you really think that by diffamation against Vas or me you could solve the evil consequences out of the crimes of these evil anonymous wussies?
Sorry,only empty words and it seems that you have a lot of them lately....
Show us the proof,people are not that stupid....
Dr.D
Of course you are right. Until the case isnt solved. Until these Osipov like figures have not yet received their appropriate sentences, everything must remain empty. Please dont panik and beat me for the truth of that situation that I havent made up. You cant expect that I would myself solve this case now.
From Vas you wont hear anything more. But yes, you are free to beat your drums. Wont solve anything either. You have no other chance than to continue your little agenda without me.
BTW family calls me to lunch. Sorry.
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
The irony is that Rolf always presents the facts based on logical grounds,but in this case Vasik's word is the ultimate verdict....well,at least for him....
Dr.D
Not if you've read and understood the thoughtful analysis in my answer to Slobo. Until now nobody else than me has understood that it cant be the question what you all see as one because we simply are in a crime case. And on thing for sure. The CCC is backing up anonymous thieves, potential terrorists who want to destroy the whole computerchess sports. Please do come back to your senses. Do you really think that by diffamation against Vas or me you could solve the evil consequences out of the crimes of these evil anonymous wussies?
Sorry,only empty words and it seems that you have a lot of them lately....
Show us the proof,people are not that stupid....
Dr.D
Of course you are right. Until the case isnt solved. Until these Osipov like figures have not yet received their appropriate sentences, everything must remain empty. Please dont panik and beat me for the truth of that situation that I havent made up. You cant expect that I would myself solve this case now.
From Vas you wont hear anything more. But yes, you are free to beat your drums. Wont solve anything either. You have no other chance than to continue your little agenda without me.
BTW family calls me to lunch. Sorry.
Ok Rolf,have a nice lunch....sorry for the jokes by the way,just wanted to make a little laugh in the middle of this madhouse here....
Cheers,
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
Graham Banks wrote:It seems like people are starting up new threads unnecessarily. Aren't there already enough of such threads? Have your say.
This really is a stupid poll.
1. If no one is interested, then the threads won't keep popping up. As long as there is interest in the issue, this will continue to remain a hot topic.
2. _you_ are adding to the proliferation of these threads with this poll.
Graham Banks wrote:It seems like people are starting up new threads unnecessarily. Aren't there already enough of such threads? Have your say.
This really is a stupid poll.
1. If no one is interested, then the threads won't keep popping up. As long as there is interest in the issue, this will continue to remain a hot topic.
2. _you_ are adding to the proliferation of these threads with this poll.
It seems that even Graham is interested: it was he himself who started the last thread.
"Well, I´m just a soul whose intentions are good,
Oh Lord, please don´t let me be misunderstood."
Graham Banks wrote:It seems like people are starting up new threads unnecessarily. Aren't there already enough of such threads? Have your say.
This really is a stupid poll.
Please read the question before having a knee jerk reaction. It is not about the topic itself, it is about setting up NEW THREADS. It is extremely irritating to be following a topic spread on a dozen threads. That is spamming.
Miguel
1. If no one is interested, then the threads won't keep popping up. As long as there is interest in the issue, this will continue to remain a hot topic.
2. _you_ are adding to the proliferation of these threads with this poll.
Graham Banks wrote:It seems like people are starting up new threads unnecessarily. Aren't there already enough of such threads? Have your say.
This really is a stupid poll.
Please read the question before having a knee jerk reaction. It is not about the topic itself, it is about setting up NEW THREADS. It is extremely irritating to be following a topic spread on a dozen threads. That is spamming.
Miguel
1. If no one is interested, then the threads won't keep popping up. As long as there is interest in the issue, this will continue to remain a hot topic.
2. _you_ are adding to the proliferation of these threads with this poll.
Please read my response _completely_. I gave two concrete reasons why it is a stupid poll.
(1) it is not going to prevent people from posting about it. How could it?
(2) it is, itself, a post about the very subject he was wanting to not see any more of. And the thread now has 40-50 posts in it.
If it (a) is not going to change anything, and (b) adds to the already too-often-mentioned topic, it really _is_ a stupid poll, wouldn't you agree? What effect will it really have? Just add to the mess.?
Dayffd wrote:Only registered users can vote in polls so as to prevent spoofing of results.
ok
If you have registered and still cannot vote then you probably do not have appropriate access rights.
And how do I get appropriate access rights?
it probably has something to do with you only being a member here for 2 months
but i dont know that for a fact
i have forwarded your question to the TCADMIN who will be able to answer this more concisely
Regards
Steve
Ummm....2 months? Yes, that could be a distinct probability and one I would have no argument with. Thank you for your answer.
Regards,
David
Fixed a small glitch - you should be able to vote now.
