Thanks Normankranium wrote:good to hear Izak!Izak Pretorius wrote:Hi Normankranium wrote:nonsense...ThatsIt wrote:suggest a modicum of research before testing any engine , had you done this with klo's offering you would have seen others state it was buggy (some even called this the worst engine ever )and even klo stated it lost on time and posted several so called fixs for it. sadly he is something of an arrogant muppet so it is very easy to be confused / mislead by the way he posts his engines on his own sitekranium wrote: [...snip...]
not sure what the disagreement is...
can you be more specific?
[...snip...]
Best wishes,
G.S.
KLO deserve nothing but credit, for the efforts i listed above,
and for maintaining his own FTP site in order to make these archives available...
http://chess.cygnitec.com/engine/ivanhoe/
his work has been of high quality, consistent, and dependable, and many many users have benefited
Correct.
This does not have to be turned into a competition,since Ivanhoe is not Peterpan's source neither is it KLO'sand KLO has done a wonderful job.
But expect more from me to come this year...
Best Regards
Peterpan
you've contributed an awful lot as well, as most know and appreciate...
keep up the excellent work!
Yes you have also contributed an awful lot with your Fire project and with hosting all of the KLO or at least all of the final KLO compiles from the Ivanhoe sources on your website and going out of your way promoting it here all this time and making sure people don't use my compiles and onlu use the best Ivanhoe compiles available to mankind
You have done a lot for Ippolit and promoting it here.
I wish you well with your Fire project and any other chess projects you may work on in this new year.
But most of all,i hope Ivanhoe gets MUCH stronger this year
...Best Regards
Peterpan
