peter wrote: ↑Sat Oct 02, 2021 8:49 am
So yet 63 all in all?
1.Kxe1 2.a4 done before your #62 counting in .pgn, 2.a4... already as first move of DTM and the Chest- parameter was Defender Moves?
Won't make you start it all over, but these 3 more plies should have been possible to be solved yet too, shouldn't they?
Of course there are some more moves to be computed instead of 1.Kx, yet they all should have short lines of denial regards
My only question is, are the winning lines from Chest 100% accurate?
If the parameters you set manually are correct, yes.
Theoretically, if you are too restrictive with those, results should possibly get wrong sometimes too, otherwise you could always set phantasy- params till you get a result at all regards
Spliffjiffer wrote: ↑Sat Oct 02, 2021 1:40 am
it takes a lot of time as it seems...i did not forseen this...this will going to be the longest research i ever made probably....i will answer when Chest has finishehed probably....i hope so...this is going to get a " defenbder-moove"...im going to expect sth like this: every move by the King draws, and everything else looses...lets see
Hobacle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 02, 2021 12:20 pm
My only question is, are the winning lines from Chest 100% accurate?
they are absolutely reliable in terms of the DTM but this does not tell that it found the shortest DTM (with the parameters you chose)
edit: if it found a mate ....if it says: no mate found, then its not reliable oc because u might have choosen wrong parameters maybe...but when its says: mate in 10, then its a mate in 10 or less !
Wahrheiten sind Illusionen von denen wir aber vergessen haben dass sie welche sind.
Hobacle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 02, 2021 12:20 pm
My only question is, are the winning lines from Chest 100% accurate?
they are absolutely reliable in terms of the DTM but this does not tell that it found the shortest DTM (with the parameters you chose)
edit: if it found a mate ....if it says: no mate found, then its not reliable oc because u might have choosen wrong parameters maybe...but when its says: mate in 10, then its a mate in 10 or less !
Hobacle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 02, 2021 12:20 pm
My only question is, are the winning lines from Chest 100% accurate?
they are absolutely reliable in terms of the DTM but this does not tell that it found the shortest DTM (with the parameters you chose)
edit: if it found a mate ....if it says: no mate found, then its not reliable oc because u might have choosen wrong parameters maybe...but when its says: mate in 10, then its a mate in 10 or less !
So, is my result reliable? ...
u mean your newest creation, right?....ill try to have a look at it with chest later on....can u plz provide so far your parameters u chose?
i will not do this instantly but later...
Wahrheiten sind Illusionen von denen wir aber vergessen haben dass sie welche sind.
Hobacle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 02, 2021 2:02 pm
So, is my result reliable? ...
its hard to say if our parameters were too restrictiv to get the perfect DTM or not imo...at least your ones were even less restrictive than mine...but i can at least confirm your result:
ChestUCI-parameters that i used:
<
HashSize: 2048 mb
DefenderMoves = enabled
ProblemType: mate
SearchDepth: 128
SearchMode: special
ChecksOnly: 6
KingSquares: 0
PieceLimit: 6
MaxMoves: 13
>
[d]8/4p2p/7p/4pp1k/8/5pp1/P2Kprrb/4nbqn w - - 0 1
analysis after 1.Kxe1 !! :
Hobacle wrote: ↑Sat Oct 02, 2021 2:02 pm
So, is my result reliable? ...
its hard to say if our parameters were too restrictiv to get the perfect DTM or not imo...at least your ones were even less restrictive than mine...but i can at least confirm your result:
No, now I think C6 is the prefect parameter, at least for this position.
