Dragon 3.2 Released at KomodoChess.com

[RubiChess]

Do you understand what the purpose of an opening book for testing is?

It's supposed to be fair.

Aka he doesn't understand.

[pohl4711]

Do you understand what the purpose of an opening book for testing is?

It's supposed to be fair.

Aka he doesn't understand.

True.
Especially, because in my SPCC Ratinglist, the balanced HERT Openings are used, not an UHO Book. So, this is all just stupid trolling by somebody, wo has no idea, what he is talking about.
By the way, this is taken from my website, above the SPCC Ratinglist, the testing conditions:
"Openings: HERT_500 testset (by Thomas Zipproth) (download the file at the "Download & Links"-section or here). Mention, the HERT-set is not an Anti-Draw (UHO or something) opening-set, but a classical, balanced opening-set."

Facepalm...

[Krzysztof Grzelak]

Especially, because in my SPCC Ratinglist, the balanced HERT Openings are used, not an UHO Book. So, this is all just stupid trolling by somebody, wo has no idea, what he is talking about. Facepalm...

So take a look at the page https://sites.google.com/site/computers ... testings-2 and see what your book looks like - a tragedy.

[Sopel]

Especially, because in my SPCC Ratinglist, the balanced HERT Openings are used, not an UHO Book. So, this is all just stupid trolling by somebody, wo has no idea, what he is talking about. Facepalm...

So take a look at the page https://sites.google.com/site/computers ... testings-2 and see what your book looks like - a tragedy.

You're a clown

[Krzysztof Grzelak]

You're a clown

Unfortunately not.

[Eelco de Groot]

It's not an obvious thing to many, you see the same argument used by others all over the board that books or openings should be balanced. Instead of insulting it could do with a minimal explanation what you guys mean to achieve with unbalanced openings.

[Sopel]

It's not an obvious thing to many, you see the same argument used by others all over the board that books or openings should be balanced.

It's never an argument, it's always a belief

[dkappe]

Especially, because in my SPCC Ratinglist, the balanced HERT Openings are used, not an UHO Book. So, this is all just stupid trolling by somebody, wo has no idea, what he is talking about. Facepalm...

So take a look at the page https://sites.google.com/site/computers ... testings-2 and see what your book looks like - a tragedy.

You're a clown

A troll in clown’s makeup.

[Krzysztof Grzelak]

A troll in clown’s makeup.

Be careful what you write.

[Graham Banks]

Do you understand what the purpose of an opening book for testing is?

It depends upon what you're wanting to achieve.

Having said that, most of us are hobbyists, and one can decide which results to look at, which rating lists to look at, which competitions to take an interest in, which type of opening books we prefer, and so on.

We've all had our share of criticism, which is okay as long as any such conversations are conducted in a respectful manner.