Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
Of course it's always better to listen to the wise man words before even considering to choose a move
Damn I'm good regards,
Dr.D
Let's see the win then regards
All right,all right,you got my sympathy,I'll try to help the poor guys here using a small part of my genius brain
It's hard to be exceptional regards,
Dr.D
Perhaps you should move first and than we will win for sure.
Steve B wrote:
anyway just to prove i harbor no ill feelings ..Dr.D and Swami's very short ban will end when i reactivate their accounts at move 27 or so
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
Of course it's always better to listen to the wise man words before even considering to choose a move
Damn I'm good regards,
Dr.D
Let's see the win then regards
All right,all right,you got my sympathy,I'll try to help the poor guys here using a small part of my genius brain
It's hard to be exceptional regards,
Dr.D
Perhaps you should move first and than we will win for sure.
Best and thanks for your time.
Gerold.
You welcome Gerold
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
* If we step back the Bishop, the game goes on and on...
* We need to simplify, considering Black has a weak pawn on b6 which can be attacked via Nd5 outpost.
* Black's dark squared Bishop is out of play, N on d5 would be very strong.
* Knights are stronger in this type of position (a lot of pawns fixed, with number of pawns in the center)
* If we step back the Bishop, the game goes on and on...
* We need to simplify, considering Black has a weak pawn on b6 which can be attacked via Nd5 outpost.
* Black's dark squared Bishop is out of play, N on d5 would be very strong.
* Knights are stronger in this type of position (a lot of pawns fixed, with number of pawns in the center)
