I thought you own Chessmaster 5000?Steve B wrote:are you replying to me?Sylwy wrote:Only envy from you !
Envy?
in what way?
i dont even own a PC Engine and have no interest in them
Did you get rid of it?
Moderator: Ras
I thought you own Chessmaster 5000?Steve B wrote:are you replying to me?Sylwy wrote:Only envy from you !
Envy?
in what way?
i dont even own a PC Engine and have no interest in them
good memory George!George Tsavdaris wrote:I thought you own Chessmaster 5000?Steve B wrote:are you replying to me?Sylwy wrote:Only envy from you !
Envy?
in what way?
i dont even own a PC Engine and have no interest in them
Did you get rid of it?
some principalSpock wrote:Absolutely right - and you know I bet Vas doesn't give a toss about the money. It will be a matter of principle for himPauloSoare wrote: Steve, I think that you are forgetting that if exists a financial interest for Vas, also exist an
interest of computer chess comunity so that Rybka plays.
CCC is a legitimate, among others, representative of the community of computer chess, then I do not
see problems in the post of Vas.
Paulo Soares
I do not understand when you write about corrupt organization.Steve B wrote:some principalSpock wrote:Absolutely right - and you know I bet Vas doesn't give a toss about the money. It will be a matter of principle for himPauloSoare wrote: Steve, I think that you are forgetting that if exists a financial interest for Vas, also exist an
interest of computer chess comunity so that Rybka plays.
CCC is a legitimate, among others, representative of the community of computer chess, then I do not
see problems in the post of Vas.
Paulo Soares
trying to debate his way into a match held by a corrupt organization
principal would be to BOYCOTT such an event especially if he does not need the money as you say,,but somehow i doubt that he does not need it
Steve
FIDEPauloSoare wrote:I do not understand when you write about corrupt organization.Steve B wrote:some principalSpock wrote:Absolutely right - and you know I bet Vas doesn't give a toss about the money. It will be a matter of principle for himPauloSoare wrote: Steve, I think that you are forgetting that if exists a financial interest for Vas, also exist an
interest of computer chess comunity so that Rybka plays.
CCC is a legitimate, among others, representative of the community of computer chess, then I do not
see problems in the post of Vas.
Paulo Soares
trying to debate his way into a match held by a corrupt organization
principal would be to BOYCOTT such an event especially if he does not need the money as you say,,but somehow i doubt that he does not need it
Steve
Paulo Soares
Forbiding Vas to post it only because he is in the rybka team will have practically no effect on the content of the messages here.Steve B wrote:ITS not even close
i am not the one selling any of the computers on Ebay
people i dont even know are selling them
as far as i know Rajlich's who made the initial post programmed and markets Rybka
if someone unrelated to Rybkas programming and marketing teams made a post with information about the Fide match(which is already 30 days old BTW)and the Rybka counter-challenge then i would have no issue with it
Steve
1)actually the proper place for Rybkas counter challenge is in the Rybka forumAlkelele wrote:Steve, please take a look at this thread from the Rybka forum:
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforu ... l?tid=1126
Then try to compare that thread with the thread here and ask yourself these questions:
1) Which thread contains the most interesting discussions with regard to this $100.000 challenge?
2) Did your posts in this thread help or prevent interesting discussions from taking off?
3) What could be the reason that the Rybka forum is far more interesting for readers interested in computer chess than the CCC forum these days?