But this is a completely different story. Fine with me if people want to argue that Carlsen should be banned for life, but it has nothing to do with the alleged engine cheating by Niemann and the wider perceived problem of engine cheating.CornfedForever wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 3:07 pm Graham can defend himself of course, but facts are facts.
David unfortunately offered advice when Magnus was ‘stuck’…Magnus asked “How?”…
Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Moderator: Ras
-
syzygy
- Posts: 6052
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:56 pm
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
-
Graham Banks
- Posts: 46351
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
I don't want to argue about bans for anybody.syzygy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:33 pmBut this is a completely different story. Fine with me if people want to argue that Carlsen should be banned for life, but it has nothing to do with the alleged engine cheating by Niemann and the wider perceived problem of engine cheating.CornfedForever wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 3:07 pm Graham can defend himself of course, but facts are facts.
David unfortunately offered advice when Magnus was ‘stuck’…Magnus asked “How?”…
I was just pointing out that Carlsen has cheated at least once as well.
I detest cheating.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
dkappe
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Intentional? Why do you have a bunch of titled players watching you play a money online tournament and kibitzing? Magnus certainly isn’t the only to do this. Seems it’s pretty commonplace in chess streaming. It’s certainly not “unintentional.”Alexander Schmidt wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:19 pmHe made a mistake, that's right. Comparing this with intentional cheating is still ridiculous.
Anyhow, whether intentional or not, cheating is cheating. Ridiculous are those who rationalize a difference.
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
-
jhellis3
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:36 am
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Could be worse... I hear there are some people who can't discern anything.Ridiculous are those who rationalize a difference.
-
dkappe
- Posts: 1636
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:52 pm
- Full name: Dietrich Kappe
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
The man who mistook a grandmaster for a hat?
Fat Titz by Stockfish, the engine with the bodaciously big net. Remember: size matters. If you want to learn more about this engine just google for "Fat Titz".
-
jhellis3
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 12:36 am
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Maybe.... who knows?
-
CornfedForever
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2022 4:08 am
- Full name: Brian D. Smith
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
Serious...did anybody say that? I don't think so....certainly don't recall anyone unless it was one of the 'Hans Cheerleaders' (each side has them). Pay no attention to cheerleaders from any side. They are just 'furniture'.syzygy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:33 pmBut this is a completely different story. Fine with me if people want to argue that Carlsen should be banned for life....CornfedForever wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 3:07 pm Graham can defend himself of course, but facts are facts.
David unfortunately offered advice when Magnus was ‘stuck’…Magnus asked “How?”…
-
CornfedForever
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2022 4:08 am
- Full name: Brian D. Smith
-
supersharp77
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2014 7:54 am
- Location: Southwest USA
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
It Seems To Me That is just The Type Of Cheating Device We Are Looking For Called "Chess Talisman Zero System (Engine)" Seems The Youtube & Web site were supposedly Shut Down Recently! Interestingly Most of The Twitter Chat Comments were in TURKISH....
https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments ... an_zero_a/
http://web.archive.org/web/202202011556 ... isman.html
-
Uri Blass
- Posts: 11246
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
- Location: Tel-Aviv Israel
Re: Carlsen withdrawal after loss to Niemann
There is a clear difference between using an engine to cheat and a situation when some weaker player tell a stronger player that the stronger player can win the queen and the stronger player is surprised to hear it and ask how(maybe because he believes that the weaker player is wrong at the time of asking).dkappe wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:45 pmIntentional? Why do you have a bunch of titled players watching you play a money online tournament and kibitzing? Magnus certainly isn’t the only to do this. Seems it’s pretty commonplace in chess streaming. It’s certainly not “unintentional.”Alexander Schmidt wrote: ↑Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:19 pmHe made a mistake, that's right. Comparing this with intentional cheating is still ridiculous.
Anyhow, whether intentional or not, cheating is cheating. Ridiculous are those who rationalize a difference.
You are right that Carlsen cheated in the relevant game but intentional using of an engine is clearly worse and the punishement should not be the same.